Revisiting the Efficient Market Hypothesis: An Empirical Investigation of Indian Capital Markets (2001-2014)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/5m3a4k03Keywords:
Market Efficiency, Efficient Market Hypothesis,, Random Walk Theory,, Random Walk Theory,Runs Test, Autocorrelation,, Indian Stock Market,, Time Series Analysis,, Emerging Economy, Stock Market Dynamics,, Statistical Methods in Finance.Abstract
This study critically evaluates the weak-form efficiency of the Indian stock market from 2001 to 2014, deploying a focused analytical lens on the NSE's NIFTY index along with six vital sectoral indices: Pharmaceuticals, Information Technology, Multinational Corporations, Banking, Fast-Moving Consumer Goods, and Nifty Junior. With a robust methodological framework, the investigation applies rigorous univariate time series analysis techniques to interrogate the indices' return patterns. This includes advanced statistical tests such as run tests for detecting dependencies, unit root tests for assessing stationarity, and autocorrelation functions (ACF) coupled with correlograms for measuring the predictability of stock returns. The research fills a critical gap in literature by providing empirical insights into the market dynamics of an emerging economy. The evidence gathered points to significant anomalies that challenge the notion of weak-form efficiency in the Indian stock markets during the assessed period. The findings have substantial implications for investors, policymakers, and scholars, calling for reconsidering the prevalent investment strategies and regulatory frameworks.
Downloads
References
1. Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2009). Investments. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
2. Gujarati, D. N., & Sangeetha. (2007). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill.
3. Fama, E. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2).
4. Fama, E. (1976). Efficient capital markets: Reply. The Journal of Finance, 31(1), 143-145.
5. Fama, E. (1991). Efficient capital markets. The Journal of Finance, 46(5).
6. Hiremath, G. S., & Kamaiah, B. (2010). Some further evidence on the behaviour of stock returns in India.
International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(2), 157.
7. Patrick, A., & Sushama, R. (2011). Efficiency of stock markets - Comparing the behaviour of NSE and NYSE stock indices. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(8), ISSN 2231-5780.
8. Poshakwale, S. (1996). Evidence of a weak form of efficiency and the day-of-the-week effect in the Indian stock market. Finance India, 10(3).
9. Ramkumar, R., et al. (2012). An analysis of market efficiency in sectoral indices: A study with a particular reference to Bombay Stock Exchange in India. European Journal of Scientific Research, 69(2), 290-297.
10. Reilly, F. K., & Brown, K. C. (2006). Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management. New Delhi: Cengage Learning.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.