The Emergence of Education 4.0 Trends in Teaching Arabic Islamic Finance Curriculum Design: A Case Study

Authors

  • Muhammad Anas Al Muhsin Senior lecturer, Faculty of Languages and Communication, Sultan Idris Education University 35900 TanjongMalim, Perak, Malaysia Author
  • NorZahidah Ahmad Ahmad Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/mzdyz092

Keywords:

Curriculum design; Arabic for Islamic Finance; Need analysis; Education 4.0; Module

Abstract

 Purpose of the study: The paper explores the characteristics of curriculum in designing Arabic for Islamic Finance module, the motivations in learning Arabic, and the importance of need analysis in designing a module for learning Arabic for specific purposes.

 

Methodology: In this study we conducted interviews with a group of undergraduate students, majoring in Islamic finance at Sultan Ahmad Shah Pahang Islamic University College (KUIPSAS). We also interviewed an experienced lecturer who has been teaching Arabic for Islamic finance courses, to give an overview for the elements needed in designing a course module that fulfilling Education 4.0 trends. [Done]

 

Main Findings: The findings highlighted that the need for concrete activities and selected learning strategies in teaching and learning Arabic for Islamic finance as suggested by respondents, such as discussion, and task-based learning. [Done]

 

Applications of this study: The needs analysis revealed the basic features, approaches, activities, and language skills that should be applied in lessons, thus giving the developer and lecturer ideas for designing a resourceful module for this course. At the same time, we are able to find out students’ lacks and needs when studying Arabic for their future professional careers. [Done]

Novelty/Originality of this study: Greater focus given on communicative skills, and writing skills based on learner-centered approaches and real-life situations supported by using authentic materials that are efficient for the students’ engagement into the real-life industry. [Done] 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Atkinson, R. H., & Longman, D.G. (1985). Reading Enhancement and Development. New York: West Publishing

Company.

[2] Balič, T. (2009). Using Authentic Materials in Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Vienna: DAAM

International Publishing.

[3] Chou, P.T. (2010). Advantages and disadvantages of ESL Course books. The Internet TESL Journal,16(11), 13.

[4] Corbett, J. (2003). An Intercultural Approach to English Language Teaching. London: Cromwell Press Ltd.

[5] Enayat, M. J., & Amirian, S. M. R. (2016). Vocabulary levels test and word associates test: can they measure

language proficiency? Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 6, 17-26.

[6] Eny Syatriana, Djamiah, H., Haryanto, &Baso, J. (2013). A Model of Creating Instructional Materials Based on the

School Curriculum for Indonesian Secondary Schools. Journal of Education and Practice,4 (20),10-18.

[7] Evans, S. (2012). Designing email tasks for the business English classroom: Implications from a study of Hong

Kong's key industries. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 202-212.

[8] Greer, R.R. (2012). Introducing plain language principles to business communication students. Business

Communication Quarterly, 75(2), 136-152.

[9] Hesse-Biber, S.N. (2010). Mixed Methods Research: Merging Theory with Practice. New York, NY: Guilford.

[10] Isabel, N.A. (2016). Developments in ESP: from register analysis to a genre-based and CLIL-based approach.

Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 22(1), 190-212.

[11] Lunenburg, F.C. (2011). Curriculum Development: Inductive Models. Schooling, 2(1), 1-8.

[12] McDonough, J. (1999). English for specific purposes (ESP) in Keith Johnson & Helen Johnson: Encyclopedic

Dictionary of Applied Linguistics; A Handbook for Language Teaching. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

[13] Nadaraj, S. (2014). Assessing student’s socialization processes through hidden curriculum in schools. Asian

Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 4, 1-18.

[14] Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis? Lewes: Falmer Press.

[15] Jesus, G.L. & Mary, F.L. (2015). Current Perspectives in Teaching English for Specific Purposes.Onomázein, 31,

38 – 51.

[16] Olivia, P.F. (2009). Developing the Curriculum.USA: Pearson Education.

[17] Richards, J.C. & Schmidt, R.W. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics.

London: Longman.

[18] SitiRahaimah, A. (2019). Aktiviti Pembelajarandan Pemudahcaraan (PdPc)Melalui Kaedah Pembelajaran

Koperatif. Perak: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

[19] Seng, E. L. K. (2014). Investigating Teachers’ Views of Student-Centred Learning Approach. International

Education Studies,7(7), 143-148.

[20] Topler, J. P. (2014). Using Authentic Materials for Students of Tourism in Slovenia: English Language Acquisition

for Students of the Faculty of Tourism of the University of Maribor. Explorations in English Language and

Linguistics, 2(2), 104-115.

[21] Trinder, R. (2013). Business Students' Beliefs About Language Learning in A University Context. English for

Specific Purposes, 32(1), 1-11.

[22] Wiles, J.W., & Bondi, J.C. (2011). Curriculum Development: A Guide to Practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ:

Pearson Education.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2019

How to Cite

Anas Al Muhsin, M., & Ahmad, N. (2019). The Emergence of Education 4.0 Trends in Teaching Arabic Islamic Finance Curriculum Design: A Case Study. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(4), 1019-1029. https://doi.org/10.61841/mzdyz092