Validity and Reliability of the Design and Technology Instrument

Authors

  • Owi Kim Huei Faculty of Technical and Vocational, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia Author
  • Ridzwan Che Rus Faculty of Technical and Vocational, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia Author
  • Arasinah Kamis Faculty of Technical and Vocational, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/z3dwvx22

Keywords:

Design and Technology, D&T, Validity, Reliability, Rasch Measurement Model

Abstract

 This study was conducted to generate empirical evidence on the validity and reliability of the items for new instrument in Design and Technology (D&T) subject. The measurement of RBT subject instruments that had been prepared consisted of 41 skill items is distributed to 100 teachers. Cluster random sampling and simple random sampling methods were utilized in selecting a total of 100 secondary school teachers all over Peninsular Malaysia who teach the subject of D&T. Two stages of processes were used to identify and validate constructs. The first stage involved the identification of constructs using exploratory factor analysis method and the second stage was construct validation stage using the Rasch measurement model. The purpose of the establishment of this instrument is to measure the four main constructs of this study, which is; (1) Designing skill; (2) Sketching skill; (3) Applying Technology skill; (4) Designing in marketing skill. At the end of the analysis, it is found that there is a total of 13 polytomous items that were discarded because they did not fulfil the inspection criteria specified in accordance to the Rasch Model. The final instrument recorded a total of 27 polytomous items subsequently that can only be used to measure the four constructs of the study. In conclusion, this study has established valid constructs for development of instruments for measuring design and technology subject. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Arasinah Kamis, Che Ghani Che Kob, Haryanti Mohd Affandi, Faizal Amin Nur Yunus, Paiman &

Widihastuti. (2019). The Effect of Implementing the Green Skills Module on Design andTechnology

Subject: Assessing the pupils’ green skills practices. Journal of Engineering Science andTechnology

Special Issue on ICEES2018, 14 (Special Issue), 18-25. ISSN: 1823-4690.

[2] Alwi, A., Kamis, A., & Ismail, B. L. H. (2018). Effects of Green Skills Module in Design and Technology

Subjects on the Student’s Knowledge in Primary School. International Journal of Academic Research in

Business and Social Sciences, 8(11), 1701–1712.

[3] Arasinah K, Ab. Rahim B, Ramlah H, Soaib A, Norhaily Ab. H (2014) Technical Skills, Knowledge

Competencies and Expected Changes in the Clothing Industry. BEST: International Journal Humanities,

Arts, Medicine & Sciences 2(1), 1-12.

[4] Azrilah Abdul Aziz, Mohd Saidfudin Masodi, & Azami Zaharim (2015). Asas model pengukuran Rasch.

UKM, Bangi.

[5] Benson, C. (2009). Design and technology: A ‘new’ subject for the English national curriculum. In A. Jones

& M. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 17–

30). Rotterdam: Sense.

[6] Bond, T. G. & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human

sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[7] Conrad, K. J., Conrad K. M., Mazza, J., Riley, B. B., Funk, R., Stein, M. A., & Dennis, M. L.

(2012). Dimensionality,hierarchical structure, age generalizability, and criterion validity of the

GAIN's Behaviioral Complexity Scale. Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 913-924, doi:10.1037/a0028196

[8] DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale Development: Theory and Applications, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Publications, ch. 3, pp. 31-58

[9] Fisher, W. P. Jr. (2007). Rating Scale Instrument Quality Criteria. Rasch measurement

transaction,21(1),1095. Retrieved from http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt211m.htm

[10] Huei, O.K., Rus, R.C., & Kamis, A. (2019). Need Analysis: Competency Development measurement

Instrument in Mastering the Content of Design and Technology Subject in High School. International

Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(6), 1043–1052

[11] Jones, L. C. R. (2016). An investigation into the knowledge and skill requirements for effective teaching of

technology in English secondary schools (Version 1). figshare. Retrieved

fromhttps://hdl.handle.net/2134/21101

[12] Kamis, A., Mohamed, S. M., Hanapi, Z., Kob, C. G. C., & Jamaluddin, R. (2017). Fashion and clothing

instrument for Malaysian fashion lecturers: An analysis of the instructors’ competency scale. Geografia:

Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(3).

[13] Kamis, A., Ahmad Puad, F. N., Mohamed, S., Che’Rus, R., Bujeng, B., Syamwil, R., & Budiastuti, E.

(2018). Items’ Validity and Reliability Using Rasch Measurement Model for Factors that Influence Clothing

Disposal Behaviour. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 9(11). 1344-1353

[14] Linacre, J. M. (2004). Test validity and Rasch measurement: construct, content, etc. Rasch Measurement

Transactions, 18(1), 970-971

[15] Linacre, J. M. (2007). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS Rasch-model computer programs. Chicago, Illinois:

MESA Press.

[16] Martin, M. (2008). “Competence in Question: The Relevance of the Design and Technology Association

Minimum Competences to Initial Teacher Education." figshare. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/3520.

[17] Mohd Kashfi Mohd Jailani. (2011). Manual Pengenalan Pengukuran Rasch & Winsteps. Pengukuran dan

Penilaian dalam Pendidikan. Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

[18] Yasin, R. M., Yunus, F. A. N., Rus, R. C., Ahmad, A., & Rahim, M. B. (2015). Validity and reliability

learning transfer item using a rasch measurement model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204,

212217.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2019

How to Cite

Kim Huei, O., Che Rus, R., & Kamis, A. (2019). Validity and Reliability of the Design and Technology Instrument. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(4), 984-993. https://doi.org/10.61841/z3dwvx22