Determinants of Consumers Attitude in Batik Lampung based on Digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/32qaq113Keywords:
Batik Lampung, Perceived Ease of Use, Attitude to Use, E-Trust, e-shopping, Digital, Pem Odelan Structural EquationAbstract
This paper examines internet users who adopt the use of digital media in consumers' attitudes to shop for Batik Lampung with the variable ease of use, perceived usefulness, trust. The purpose of this study was to determine the attitudes of the consents who adopted the use of digital media or one of them the use of e-shopping in Batik Lampung shopping. The samples in this study were as many as 100 customers Batik Lampung were analyzed using structural equation modeling. The results show the Perceived Ease of USe has a negative and insignificant influence on the Attitude to Use variable of Batik Lampung consumers in digital shopping. The perceived benefits have a positive and significant relationship with Attitude to Use Batik Lampung consumers in digital shopping and E-Trust has a positive and significant relationship with the Attitude to Use Batik Lampung consumers in digital shopping.
Downloads
References
[1] Anckar, B., and Walden, P., (2000) Destination Maui? An exploratory assesment of the efficacy of selfbooking in travel. Electronic Markets, 10(2), 110-119.
[2] Arisandi B Suciati N and Wijaya A Y 2011 Pengenalan Motif Batik dengan Rotated WavelFilter dan Neural
Network JUTI 9 2 pp 13-19
[3] Babin, B.J., Darden, W.R. and Griffen, M. (1994), “Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian
shopping value”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 644-56.
[4] Bensebaa, F. (2004), “The impact of strategic actions on the reputation building of e-businesses”,
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 32 No. 6, pp. 286-301.
[5] Casalo, L., Flavian, C., Guinaliu, M., 2007. The impact of participation in virtual brand communities on
consumer trust and loyalty. The case of free software. Online Information Review 31 (6), 775–792.
[6] Chau, P., Y., K., (1996b.) An empirical investigation on factors affecting the acceptance of CASE by
systems developers. Information and Management 30(6), pp. 269-280.
[7] Chau, P., Y., K., Cole, M., Massey, A., P., Montoya-Weiss, M., and O’Keefe, R., M., (2002) Cultural
differences in the online behavior of customers. Communications of the ACM, 45, 10 Oct, pp. 139- 143.
[8] Chau, P.Y.K., 1996. An empirical assessment of a modified technology model. Journal of Management
Information Systems 13 (2), 185–204.
[9] Chau, P.Y.K., Hu, P.J., 2001. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model
comparison approach. Decision Sciences 32 (4), 699–719.
[10] Chen, L., Tan, J., 2004. Technology adaptation in e-commerce: key determinants of virtual stores
acceptance. European Management Journal 22 (1), 74–86.
[11] Chilers, L., Carr, C.L., Peck, J. and Carson, S. (2001), “Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail
shopping behaviour”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 77, pp. 511-35.
[12] Cho, N., and Park, S., (2001) Development of electronic commerce User-Consumer Satisfaction Index
(UCSI) for internet shopping, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 101(8), pp. 400-405.
[13] Citrin, A.V., Sprott, D.E., Silverman, S. N., and Stem, D.E., (2000) Adoption of Internet shopping: The role
of consumer innovativeness. Industrial Management and Data System, 100 (7), pp. 294-300.
[14] Corbit, B. J., Thanasankit, T., and Yi, H., (2003) Trust and E- commerce: a Study of Consumer Perceptions, Electronic Commerce Research and Application, 2: pp. 203-215.
[15] Cyr, D. (2008) Modeling web site design across cultures: relationships to trust, satisfaction, and e-loyalty. Journal of Management Information Systems. 24 (4), pp 47-72.
[16] Cyr, D., Kindra, G.S. and Dash, S. (2008) Web site design, trust,satisfaction, and e-loyalty: the Indian experience. Online Information Review, 32(6), pp. 773-790.
[17] Davis, F. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information
Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, pp-319-340.
[18] Davis, F. D., (1986) A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information
systems: theory and results. Doctoral dissertation. Sloan School of Management, MIT.
[19] Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P.R. (1989) User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A
Comparison of two Theoretical Models. Maryland.
[20] Davis, F.D., 1993. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and
behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38, 475–487.
[21] Davis, S.H., Wiedenbeck, S., 2001. The mediating effects of intrinsic motivation, ease of use and usefulness
perceptions on performance in first-time and subsequent computer users. Interacting with Computers 13,
549–580.
[22] DeLone, W. H and McLean, E. R. (2004) Applying the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success
Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9 (1), pp. 31-47.
[23] Duggan, M., Ellison, N.B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A. and Madden, M. (2015) Demographics of Key Social
Networking Platforms. Pew Research Center, 9.
[24] Fadila, Abi. 2017. Penerapan Geometri Transformasi pada Motif Batik Lampung. ProsidingSeminar
Nasional Pendidikan. STKIP Muhammadiya Pringsewu. ISBN : 978-602-70313-2-6.
[25] Featherman, M.S., Pavlov, P.A., 2003. Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective.
International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 35 (8), 982–1003.
[26] Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I, (1975). Beliefs, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and
research, Boston: AddisonWesley. Reading MA.
[27] Fukuyama, F. (1995), Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, The Free Press, New York,
NY.
[28] Ha, Sejin and Stoel, Leslie. 2009. Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology
acceptance model. Journal of Business Research 62 (2009) 565–571.
[29] Hair, Jr., J. F., William C, Babin, Barry J, Anderson, Rolph E., (2010) Multivariate data analysis: a Global
Perspective, Seventh Edition, Global Edition, Pearson Education, Inc, New Jersey, USA.
[30] Hair, Jr., J.F., Bush, Sr. Robert P, Ortinau, David L., (2009) Marketing research: in a digital information
environment, fourth edition, international edition. Mcgraw-hill companies inc, New Jersey, USA.
[31] Hernandez, B., Jimenez, J., and Martin, M. J., (2009) The impact of self-efficacy, ease of use and usefulness
on e-purchasing: ananalysis of experienced e-shoppers. Interacting with computers, 21, pp. 146-156.
[32] Hernandez, B., Jimenez, J., and Martin, M. J., (2011) Age, gender and income: do they really moderate
online shopping behaviour?.Online Information Review, 35 (1), pp. 113-133.
[33] Hill, W. W., and Beatty, S.E. (2011) A model of adolescents’ online consumer self-efficacy (OCSE).
Journal of Business Research, 64, pp. 1025 – 1033.
[34] Ismail, A.R. (2017) ‘The influence of perceived social media marketing activities on brand loyalty the
mediation effect of brand and value consciousness’, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol.
29, No. 1, pp.129–144.
[35] Jin, B., Park, J. Y., and Kim, J. (2007) Cross-cultural examination of the relationships among firm
reputation, e-satisfaction, e-trust, and e-loyalty. International Marketing Review, 25(3), pp.324-337.
[36] Jin, B., Park, J. Y., and Kim, J. (2008) A cross-cultural examination of the relationships among firm
reputation, e-satisfaction, e-trust, and e-loyalty. International Marketing Review. 25(3), pp. 324-337.
[37] Kim, H., Kim T., and Shin, S.W., (2009) Modeling roles of subjective norms e-Trust in customers
acceptance of airline B2C eCommerce websites. Tourism Management, 30(2), pp. 266-277.
[38] Kim, J. and Forsythe, S., (2010) Factors affecting adoption of product virtualization technology for online
consumer electronics shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distributio Management, 38 (3), pp. 190-
204.
[39] Kim, W., Di Benedetto C, Lancioni, R. (2011) The effects of country and gender differences on consumer
innovativeness and decision processes in a highly globaliized high-tech product market. Asia Pasific J
Market Logist 23(5), pp. 714-744.
[40] Kozinets, R.V., 2002. The field behind the screen: using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research 39 (1), 61–72.
[41] Lian, J., and Lin, T., (2008) Effect of customer characteristics on their acceptance of online shopping: comparisons among different product types. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, pp. 48-65.
[42] Malhotra, Naresh K., (2007) Marketing research: an applied orientation, Fifth Edition, Pearson International Edition, New Jersey, USA.
[43] Mangold, W.G. and Faulds, D.J. (2009) ‘Social media: the new hybrid element of the promotion mix’,
Business Horizons, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp.357–365.
[44] Marketingcloudcom (2013) Everything You Need to Know about Social Media Ads
[45] McKnight, D. H., and Chervany, N., L., (2001) Conceptualizing trust: a typology and e-commerce customer
relationships model. In proceedings of the 34 th Hawaii International conference on system science. IEEE.
[46] McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C., (2002) Developing and validating trust measures for ecommerce: an integrative typology. Information systems research, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 334-59
[47] Mukherjee, A., dan Nath, P., (2003) A Model of Trust in Online Relationship Banking, International
Journal of Bank Marketing, 21(1): pp. 5-15.
[48] Neuman, W. Lawrence (2000) Social research methods, quantitative and qualitative approach, fourth
edition, needham heights MA: a pearson education company.
[49] cass A, and Fenech Tino. 2003. Webretailing adoption: exploring the nature of internet users Webretailing
behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 10, pp. 81–94.
[50] Pereira, H., Goncalves, and Salgueiro, Maria de Fatima., (2016). Online determinants of e-customer
satisfaction: application to website purchases in tourism.
[51] Pfeffer, J., (1982) Organizations and Organization Theory, Pitman, Boston, MA.
[52] Pookulangara dan Koesler. 2011. Cultural influence on consumers’ usage of social networks and its’ impact
on online purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 18 (2011) 348–354
[53] R Andrian et al. 2019. k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) Classification for Recognition of the Batik Lampung
Motifs. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1338 (2019).
[54] Radner, R. and Rothschild, M. (1975) On theAllocation of Effort, Journal of economic theory (10), pp. 358-
376.
[55] Reichheld, F.F., and Schefter, P., (2000) The loyalty: your secret weapn on the web, Havard Business
Review, Vol. 78, 4, pp. 105115.
[56] Ribbink D, Van Riel, Liljander V, Streukens S, (2004) Comport your online customer: quality, trust, and
loyalty on the internet. Manag serv Q 14(6):pp. 446-456.
[57] Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D., dan Arinze, B., (2002) Some Antecedents and Effect of Trust in Virtual
Communities, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11: pp. 271-295.
[58] Rustiati, Elly Lestari et al. 2019. Sinergitas Penggiatan Ekonomi Kerajinan Batik Lampung, Eksplorasi
Budaya Dan Edukasi Konservasi: Andanan Batik Tulis, Negeri Sakti, Pesawaran, Lampung. Sakai
Sambayan-Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat. Vol 3 No 2 Juli 2019.
[59] Schein, E. H., (1980) Organizational Psychology, thrid edition, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[60] Schramm-Klein, H. (2003) Multi-Channel-Retailing- Verhaltenswissenschafiliche Analyse der Wirkung von
Mehrkanalsystemen im Handel. Wiesbaden.
[61] Sexton, R., S., Johnson, R., A., and Hignite, M., A., (2002) Predicting internet/ e-commerce use. Internet
Research: ElectronicNetwork Application and Polocy, 112 (5), pp. 402-410.
[62] Tam, Jackie Lai-Ming., (2012) The moderating role perceived risk in loyalty intention: an investigation in
service context. Marketing intelligence and planning, Vol. 30 No.1, pp. 33-52.
[63] Tamimi, N., Rajan, M., Rose, S., (2003) The state of online retailing, internet research. Vol. 13 Iss. 3 pp.
146-155.
[64] Tung, L. L., Tan, P. L. J., Chia, P. J. T., Koh, Y. L., and Yeo, H. L., (2001) An Empirical Investigation of
Virtual Communities and Trust, Proceedings of Twenty-Second International Conference on Information
Systems, pp. 307-319.
[65] Vijayasarathy, L., R., (2004) Predicting consumer intentions to use online shopping: the case for an
augmented technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 41 (6), pp. 747-762.
[66] Vroom, V. (1964) Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.
[67] Wibasuri, Anggalia; Bangsawan, Satria; Mahrinasari and Ribhan. 2018. ‘Determinants of Attitude Tourist in
E-Tourism Usage’. International Journal of Engineering &Technology (UAE), 7 (4), pp. 6044-6050.
[68] Wolff, M. (2005) Determinanten und Beeinflussungsstrategien des Kundenadoptions-undnutzungsverhaltens von Distributionskanalen – Eine absatzabschlussfokussierte Analyse aus der
Kundenperspektive, Inaugural-Dissertation an der LudwigMaximallians-UniversitatMunchen. Munchen.
[69] Wu, S., (2003) The relationship between consumer characteristics and attitude toward online shopping. Marketing intelligence and planning, 21(1), pp. 37-44.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
