What Determine the Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Indonesian Agriculture Manufacturing Firms?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/6fxfse50Keywords:
Organizational citizenship, Agriculture firms, IndonesiaAbstract
The main purpose of the current study is to investigate the determine the organizational citizenship behavior in Indonesian agriculture manufacturing firms. Total 670 questionnaires were distributed among the agricultural manufacturing firms of Indonesia. The response rate was very good due to which a total of 470 questionnaires have been received, with a response rate of 71%.The study has used the SEM-PLS as the statistical technique to answer the research questions. Furthermore, the study used this technique primarily because this paper aims to assess whether these variables have any mediating effect on the relationships. The other reason is that this technique of PLS path modeling is compatible with the normal as well as non-normal data. Most social science researches exhibit non-normality of data. Therefore, PLS is suitable for these kinds of researches, as it can easily handle the data abnormality. Another significant feature of PLS path modeling is its proficiency in simultaneously estimating the measurement and the structural model. The response rate of the study is 71 percent, which is considerably higher. The study is among the pioneering study on the issue and will be helpful for the policymakers and researchers
Downloads
References
[1] Al-A’wasa, S. I. S. (2018). The Impact of Organizational Justice on the Counterproductive Work Behavior
(CWB): A Field Study Conducted in the Jordan Customs Department (JCD). International journal of
business and social science, 9(1), 27-38.
[2] Anjum, A., Sabir, H. M., & Khaliq, T. (2016). Impact of Organization Trust, Organization Justice and Job
Satisfaction on Organization Citizenship Behavior: A study in Banking Sector of Pakistan. International
journal of academic research in business and social sciences, 6(12), 630-643.
[3] Baloyi, S., Van Waveren, C. C., & Chan, K.-Y. (2014). The role of supervisor support in predicting
employee job satisfaction from their perception of the performance management system: A test of competing
models in engineering environments. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 25(1), 85-95.
[4] Campbell Pickford, H., & Joy, G. (2016). Organisational citizenship behaviours: Definitions and
dimensions. Saïd Business School WP, 31.
[5] Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure.
Journal of applied psychology, 86(3), 386.
[6] Duarte, P. A. O., & Raposo, M. L. B. (2010). A PLS model to study brand preference: An application to the
mobile phone market Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 449-485): Springer.
[7] Eisenberger, R., Malone, G. P., & Presson, W. D. (2016). Optimizing perceived organizational support to
enhance employee engagement. Society for Human Resource Management and Society for Industrial and
Organizational Psychology, 2-22.
[8] Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and
measurement error: Algebra and statistics: SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
[9] Fu, Y., & Lihua, Z. (2012). Organizational justice and perceived organizational support: The moderating
role of conscientiousness in China. Nankai Business Review International, 3(2), 145-166.
[10] Gustafsson, A., & Johnson, M. D. (2004). Determining attribute importance in a service satisfaction model.
Journal of service research, 7(2), 124-141.
[11] Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing
theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
[12] Hartinah, S., Suharso, P., Umam, R., Syazali, M., Lestari, B., Roslina, R., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020).
Teacher’s Performance Management: The Role of Principal’s Leadership, Work Environment and
Motivation in Tegal City, Indonesia. Management Science Letters, 10(1), 235-246.
[13] Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in
variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115-135.
[14] Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in
international marketing New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277-319): Emerald Group
Publishing Limited.
[15] Jiang, J. J., & Klein, G. (1999). Supervisor support and career anchor impact on the career satisfaction of the
entry-level information systems professional. Journal of management information systems, 16(3), 219-240.
[16] Jöreskog, K. G. (1973). Analysis of covariance structures Multivariate analysis–III (pp. 263-285): Elsevier.
[17] Lee, C.-K., Song, H.-J., Lee, H.-M., Lee, S., & Bernhard, B. J. (2013). The impact of CSR on casino
employees’ SS, job satisfaction, and customer orientation: An empirical examination of responsible
gambling strategies. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33, 406-415.
[18] Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship
behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of applied psychology, 76(6),
845.
[19] Morgan, D., & Krejcie, R. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and
psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
[20] ODOR, H. O. (2018). Organisational culture and dynamics. Global Journal of Management And Business
Research.
[21] Onn, C. Y., Peng, T. L., & Lung, C. K. (2014). Supervisory Support, Organizational Justice and Perceived
Organizational Support: A Review and Research Agenda. Information Management and Business Review,
6(5), 255.
[22] Pérez López, S., Manuel Montes Peón, J., & José Vázquez Ordás, C. (2004). Managing knowledge: the link
between culture and organizational learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 93-104.
[23] Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The
contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of applied psychology, 86(5), 825.
[24] Shukla, A., & Rai, H. (2015). Linking perceived organizational support to SS and commitment: Moderating
role of psychological capital. Global Business Review, 16(6), 981-996.
[25] Singh, U., & Srivastava, K. B. (2016). Organizational trust and organizational citizenship behaviour. Global
Business Review, 17(3), 594-609.
[26] Tabachnick, B. G. (2001). & Fidell, LS (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bamberger et, 31, l.
[27] Tambe, S. (2014). A study of organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) and its dimensions: a literature
review.
[28] Veličkovska, I. (2017). Organizational citizenship behavior-definition, determinants and effects.
Engineering management, 3(1), 40-51.
[29] Vieira-dos Santos, J., & Gonçalves, G. (2018). Organizational Culture, Internal Marketing, and Perceived
Organizational Support in Portuguese Higher Education Institutions. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de
las Organizaciones, 34(1), 38-41.
[30] Wang, Z. (2014). Perceived supervisor support and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of
organizational commitment. International journal of business and social science, 5(1).
[31] Yadav, M., & Rangnekar, S. (2015). Supervisory support and organizational citizenship behavior:
Mediating role of participation in decision making and job satisfaction. Paper presented at the EvidenceBased HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship.
[32] Yılmaz, K., & Taşdan, M. (2009). Organizational citizenship and organizational justice in Turkish primary
schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(1), 108-126.
[33] Zeyada, M. (2018). Organizational Culture and its Impact on Organizational Citizenship Behavior.
International journal of academic research in business and social sciences, 8(3), 418-429.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
