Transformation of the Political Regime in Modern Russia: Forecasting and Management in the Paradigm of Sovereign Transit

Authors

  • Potapov Denis Viktorovich ostgraduate Student, Department of World Politics and International Relations, Voronezh State University, Russian Federation, Voronezh, Universitetskaya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/jamsge37

Keywords:

Political Regime, Transformation, Political Subjectivity, Ideology, Ideologem, Ideological Construction, Sovereign Transit Paradigm

Abstract

 The article is devoted to summarizing the results of a comprehensive study by the author of the political regime transformation in modern Russia. It is based on the assumption that for planning and managing the political regime transformation in modern Russia, it should be considered in the paradigm of sovereign (rather than democratic) transit. The study proved for the first time the conditionality of the crisis of the democratic transit paradigm by erosion of the democratic institutions of economically developed countries of the West; the ideological component of the transformation of political regimes is investigated; the complex of subject-object relations of the Russia political regime transformation is considered. The assessment of the prospects of gaining by Russia the national subjectivity of the political regime; the concept of “sovereign transit paradigm” is introduced into scientific circulation. The international experience of changing ideologies as a tool for transforming the political regime is analyzed. The basic elements of the planning system and the management of the transformation of the political regime of modern Russia in the sovereign transit paradigm are described; the choice of the ideology that is most relevant for Russia at the present stage of the transformation of the political regime is substantiated 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Attali J. Millennium: Winners and Losers in the Coming Order. Three Rivers Press 1992 105 p.

[2] Kagan R. The World America Made - and Trump Wants to Unmake. // Politico Magazine September 28, 2018

URL: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/09/28/donald-trump-unga-liberal-world-order-220738/(

08.10.2018)

[3] US National Security Strategy February 6, 2015 URL: http://nssarchive.us/wp-content/uploads /2015/

02/2015.pdf/ (08.10.2018)

[4] Brooks D. Bobos In Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There Simon & Schuster, 2000, 284 p.

[5] Kagan R. The Jungle Grows Back: America and Our Imperiled World Knopf, 2018. 192 р.

[6] Cox M., Ikenberry G.J., Inoguchi T. American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies and Impacts.

Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2000

[7] Burnell P. From Evaluating Democracy Assistance to Appraising Democracy Promotion // Political Studies -

2008.- No. 56.- P. 414–434.

[8] Magen A., McFaul M. Introduction: American and European Strategies to Promote Democracy — Shared

Values, Common Challenges, Divergent Tools? // Promoting Democracy and the Rule of Law. American and

European Strategies / Eds. A. Magen, T. Risse, and M.A. McFaul. Basingstoke: Palgrave Mcmillan. 2009. P.

1–33.

[9] Schraeder P.J. The State of the Art in International Democracy Promotion: Results of a Joint European-North

American Research Network // Democratization, 2003, No.10(2). P. 26.

[10] Merkel W. Systemtransformation. Eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Transformations for

schung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. 2010. Р. 456.

[11] Engelhardt Т. America Was in Decline Long Before Trump Stepped Into Office The Nation September 27,

2018 URL: https://www.thenation.com/article/america-was-in-decline-long-before-trump-stepped-intooffice//( 08.10.2018)

[12] BuchananP. J. Russia Gives Up on Trump and the West // The American Conservative September 21, 2018.

[13] Huntington S. P. The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century Norman: University of

Oklahoma Press, 1991.

[14] Diamond L ―Is the Third Wave Over?‖ // Journal of Democracy. – 1996, Vol. 7. p. 20-37.

[15] King С. ―Potemkin Democracy‖ //The National Interest. 2001. Vol. 64. P. 93-104.

[16] Carothers Т. The End of the Transition Paradigm // Johns Hopkins University Press Journal of Democracy.

2002. Volume 13, Number 1. pp. 5-21URL:

[17] Democratisation in the 21st Century. Reviving Transitology. Edited by M.M.O. Mohamedou, T. D. Sisk

Routledge 2017. 218 p.

[18] Haerpfer C.W. et al. Democratization. / C.W. Haerpfer, P. Bernhagen, R.F. Inglehart, C. Welzel. Oxford

Academ. 2009. 456 р.

[19] Mommsen M. [Russian political regime: neo-Soviet authoritarianism and patronage presidency] // Journal Club

Intelros. - 2010.-No.6. URL: http://www.intelros.ru/readroom/nz/nz-74-6-2010/8293-rossijskij-politicheskijrezhim-neosovetskij-avtoritarizm-i-patronazhnoe-prezidentstvo.html (address of 08.25.2018).

[20] Chaiko I.V. [Problems of research of regime transformations, or neopatrimonial alternative to transitology]. //

Political conceptology. - 2013. No. 1. - p. 131 - 142.

[21] Achkasov V.A. [Transitology - a scientific theory or an ideological construct?] // Policy. Political Studies. -

2015. -№ 1. - p. 30-37.

[22] Korovin V. [Smart oligarchy: does the Russian ―big business‖ have social responsibility?] // Zavtra,

08/30/2018 URL: http://zavtra.ru/ blogs/smart_oligarhiya (accessed 10/15/2018)

[23] Gorshkov M.K. [Russian society in the context of a new reality. To the results and continuation of the

sociological megaproject] / ed. I.O. Tyurina. M.: All World, 2017.104 p.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2019

How to Cite

Denis Viktorovich, P. (2019). Transformation of the Political Regime in Modern Russia: Forecasting and Management in the Paradigm of Sovereign Transit. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(4), 496-499. https://doi.org/10.61841/jamsge37