Verbal Barriers to Effective Intercultural Communication: A Case Study of International Students in Hungary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/dvz9ft37Keywords:
intercultural communication, verbal communication, barriers of communication, international studentAbstract
In the past years, the number of international students admitted to Hungarian higher education institutions increased rapidly. Students from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds encounter several challenges in the new host country. Therefore, the main purpose of the present study is to shed light on intercultural communication experiences by international students in Hungary, with particular attention to the verbal communication barriers. The participants of the study were 75 foreign students who are studying at Hungarian universities. All of them are second language (L2) speakers of English except for one student, who is an English native speaker. Data collection was conducted through survey questionnaires and interviews. The results show that verbal communication is the main barrier that participants experience while communicating with people with various cultural backgrounds. Moreover, the analysis reveals these verbal communication barriers arise for different reasons, such as speaking different mother tongues, not speaking a shared language fluently, using wrong words, and having a foreign accent.
Downloads
References
1. Bajzát, T. (2017). Verbal and non-verbal intercultural communication barriers of international students in Hungary. Language World, 7-15.
2. Barna, M. L. (1994). Stumbling Blocks in Intercultural Communication. In L. Samovar & R. Porter, Intercultural Communication: A Reader (pp. 337-346). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
3. Behrnd, V. & Porzelt, S. (2012). Intercultural competence and training outcomes of students with experiences abroad. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 213-223.
4. Bodycott, P., & Lai, A. (2012). The Influence and Implications of Chinese Culture in the Decision to Undertake Cross-Border Higher Education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 252-270.
5. Clarke III, I., Flaherty, T. B., Wright, N. D., & McMillen, R. M. (2009). Student Intercultural Proficiency From Study Abroad Programs. Journal of Marketing Education, 173-181.
6. Fowler, F. (1988). Survey Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Frey, L. R., Botan, C. H., & Kreps, G. L. (2000). Investigating Communication: An Introduction to Research Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
8. Gudykunst, W. (1998). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication. London: Sage.
9. Gudykunst, W. B. (2003). Intercultural Communication: Introduction. In W. B. Gudykunst, Crosscultural and intercultural communication (pp. 163–166). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
10. Henze, J., & Zhu, J. (2012). Current research on Chinese students studying abroad. Research in Comparative and International Education, 90–104.
11. Holmes, P. (2005). Ethnic Chinese students’ communication with cultural others in a New Zealand university. Communication Education, 289–311.
12. Hortobagyi, I. (2017). The linguistic rhythms of urban spaces: New approaches to everyday multilingualism. TOPOS: Journal of Space and Humanities, 97-108.
13. Jackson, J. (2008). Globalization, internationalization, and short-term stays abroad. Journal of Intercultural Relations, 349-358.
14. Jayasuriya, L., Sang, D., & Fielding, A. (1992). Ethnicity, immigration, and mental illness: A critical review of Australian research. Carlton, Australia: Bureau of Immigration Research.
15. Keles, Y. (2013). What Intercultural Communication Barriers do Exchange Students of the Erasmus Program Have During Their Stay in Turkey, Mugla? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1513-1524.
16. Kim, Y., & Gudykunst, W. (1988). Theories in Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
17. Lewis, R. D. (1996). When Cultures Collide: Managing Successfully Across Cultures. London: N. Brealey Pub.
18. Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQuenn, K. M., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative research methods: a data collector’s field guide. North Carolina: Family Health International.
19. Marginson, S. & Sawir, E. (2011). Conclusion 2: toward intercultural education. Ideas for intercultural, 165–185.
20. Peacock, N., & Harrison, N. (2008). “It’s So Much Easier to Go with What’s Easy”: “Mindfulness” and the Discourse Between Home and International Students in the United Kingdom. Journal of Studies in International Education, 487-508.
21. Peacock, N., & Harrison, N. (2009). "It’s so much easier to go with what’s easy": "Mindfulness" and the discourse between home and international students in the United Kingdom. Journal of Studies in International Education, 487–508.
22. Porter, R. E. & Samovar, L. A. (2004). Communication Between Cultures. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
23. Redmond, M. V., & Bunyi, J. M. (1993). The relationship of intercultural communication competence
with stress and the handling of stress as reported by international students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 235-254.
24. Sawir, E. (2005). Language difficulties of international students in Australia: The effects of prior learning experience. International Education Journal, 567-580.
25. Scott, W. A., & Scott, R. (1989). Family correlates of high school student adjustment: A cross-cultural study. Australian Journal of Psychology, 269-284.
26. Sovic, S. (2009). Hi-bye friends and the herd instinct: international and home students in the creative arts. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 747-761.
27. Spencer-Oatey, H. & Franklin, P. (2009). Intercultural interaction: A multidisciplinary approach to intercultural communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
28. Spencer-Oatey, H., Dauber, D., Jing, J., & Lifei, W. (2017). Chinese students’ social integration into the university community: hearing the students’ voices. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 739–756.
29. Spitzman, E. (2014). Situated intercultural communication: domestic and international student interaction. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (URI 3619483).
30. Volet, S. E., & Ang, G. (2012). Culturally mixed groups on international campuses: an opportunity for intercultural learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 21–37.
31. Williams, T. R. (2005). Exploring the Impact of Study Abroad on Students’ Intercultural Communication Skills: Adaptability and Sensitivity. Journal of Studies in International Education, 356-371.
32. Yuan, W. (2011). Academic and cultural experiences of Chinese students at an American university: a qualitative study. Intercultural Communication Studies, 141–157.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
