Morality and Politics Relation: Dirty Hands Action and Posibility of Karl Popper Minimalist Democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/y44yq629Keywords:
Dirty Hands, Morality, Politics, Pluralism, Moral FragmentationAbstract
This research studied the problematic and political relationship of morality in political philosophy reviewed from the dirty hands and minimalist democracy possibility of Karl Popper. The method used in this research is library research with interpretative analysis. The object of research materials on the morality and political relations, which are associated with the dirty hands action and minimalist democracy possibility of Karl Popper. The formal object of this research is political philosophy. The exploration of literature studies and the analysis of moral and political relations was examined through the works of Plato, Aristotle, and Machiavelli. It was discovered that the fragmentation of unsolved moral values became central to understanding the relationship between morality and politics. Morality and politics are two things related to each other. This analysis of moral and political relations is complemented by raising the morale of the dirty hands concept that defies politicians who are increasingly symptomatic.
Downloads
References
[1] Allen, Nathan W (2015). Clientelisme and Personal vote in Indonesia. Electoral Studies 37, 73-85.
[2] Aristotle, (1996). The Politics and The Constitution of Athens, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[3] Aristotle, (2000) Nicomachean Ethics,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[4] Aristoteles. (2016). Politik. (S. Pasaribu, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Narasi.
[5] Baron, H. (1961). Machiavelli : The Republican Citizen and the Author of ’ the Prince ’. The English
Historical Review, 76(299), 217–253.
[6] Berlin, Isaiah (2001) Against the Current, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[7] Benner, Erica (2009) Machiavelli’s Ethics, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.
[8] Budiardjo, Miriam (2017). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Edisi Revisi Cetakan keempatbelas. Jakarta:
Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
[9] Crick, Bernard (2000) In Defense of Politics. Continuum, London n New York.
[10] de Wijze, Stephen (2005). ‘Tragic Remorse – The Anguish of Dirty Hands’, Ethical Theory and Moral
Practice, Vol. 7, No.5, 453-471.
[11] Drugge, Oskar Daniel (2013). Moral Conflict, Tragedy and Political Action in Isaiah Berlin’s Political
Thought.
[12] Dwihantoro, Prihatin (2013). Etika dan Kejujuran dalam Berpolitik. Politika, Vol 4 No 2, 13-21.
[13] Fenichel Pitkin, Hanna (1993). Wittgenstein and Justice: On the Significance of Ludwig Wittgenstein for
Social and Political Thought, University of California Press, Berkley, Los Angeles, and London.
[14] Filis, Mario (2012). The Inner Connection Between Politics and Morality: Historical and Analitical
Explorations.
[15] Haryatmoko. (2003). Etika Politik dan Kekuasaan. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas
[16] Heywood, Andrew (2015). Political Theory: An Introduction, 4th edition, p.81.
[17] Ibragim et al (2018). Machiavellianism and Manipulation : from social philosophy to social psychology.
Xlinguae, Volume 11, Issue 2: DOI:10.18355/XL.2018.11.02.33.
[18] Isra, Saldi et al (2017). Obstruction of Justice in The Effort to Eradicate Corruption In Indonesia.
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 51, 72-83.
[19] Kekes, John (1993). The Morality of Pluralism. Princenton University Press, Princenton New Jersey, p.3-9.
[20] Machiavelli, Niccolo (1998) The Prince, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[21] Machiavelli, N. (2018). Sang Pangeran. (N. Triaji, Ed.). Jakarta: Stomata.
[22] Matthew H. Kramer (2017). On Political Morality and the Conditions for Warranted Self-Respect
[23] Misra, Maria (2016). The Indian Machiavelli: Pragmatism versus Morality, and The reception of The
Arthasastra in India 1905-2014. Modern Asia Studies: Cambridge Universities Press.
[24] Navisa, Fitria Dewi (2018). Rekonstruksi Mekanisme Penanganan Politik Uang demi Terwujudnya Pemilu
yang Adil dan Bermartabat. Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 4 Nomor 3 Tahun
2018, 1277-1296.
[25] Okorie Ogbonnaya Okomba (2006). The Ethical Implication of Separating Morality from Politics: Taking A
Cue From Machiavellian Political Ideas And The Nigerian Political Experience.
[26] Plato, (1998). ‘Crito’, dalam Thomas G. West (ed.), Four Texts On Socrates, Plato’s Euthyphro, Apology,
and Crito, and Aristophanes’ Clouds, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.
[27] Plato, (1998). Republic, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[28] Ritaudin, M. S. (2017). Political Promises in the Perspectives of Islam and Its Implementation in
Development Policy. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(4), 83–88.
[29] Russel, Bertrand (2007). History of Western Philosophy and its Connection with Political and Social
Circumstances from the Earliest Times to The Present Day. George Allen and UNWIN LTD, London, p.112.
[30] Schmand, J., Henry (2015). A History of Political Philosophy, diterjemahkan Ahmad Baidlowi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
[31] Stephen A. De Wijze & Tom L. Goodwin, (2009). ‘Bellamy on Dirty Hands and Lesser Evils: A Response’, BJPIR, Vol. 11, 529-540.
[32] Tigard, Daniel W. (2018). Moral Distress as a Symptom of Dirty Hands, Springer Nature B.V.
[33] Tillyris, Demetris (2013). Political Morality and the Problem of Dirty Hands: A Philosophical Critique and
Re-interpretation.
[34] Tillyris, Demetris (2015). Learning How Not to Be Good: Machiavelli and The Standard Dirty Hands
Thesis. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 18:61-74.
[35] Walzer, Michael (1973). ‘Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 2, No. 2 , 160-180.
[36] Wittgenstein, B. L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul.
[37] Yunus, Nur Rohim (2014). Etika dan Moralitas Politik Anggota Dewan. Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol 2 No 2, 255-274.
[38] Zed, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
