Exploring the Determinants that Control Information Overload and Postgraduate Research Performance: Conceptual Model and Implications for Future Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/aec41489Keywords:
Information Overload, Conceptual Model, Research PerformanceAbstract
This study was performed in one of the top five research universities in Malaysia to explore the impact of information overload (IO) on academic research performance among postgraduate students. It aims to get a deep understanding of the (IO) phenomenon effect on postgraduate research performance, and what are the possible determinants could control this effect. In-depth semi-structured individual interviews and one focus group interview were employed. Purposive and snowballing sampling has been implemented for data collection and verification. Numerous studies in many fields of sciences have been conducted about the aggravated effect of IO phenomenon and its impacts on the social, personal and organizational level. However, inadequate studies found to address the problem of information overload among postgraduate academic researchers. Most of the participants in this study exposed that IO represents a real miserable problem that severely affects their research performance in different stages of their research. Two main contributions introduced in this phenomenological research. First, this study proposed an original conceptual model, which includes four possible moderators identified as (a) information literacy, (b) self-efficacy, (c) expert’s consultation, (d) supervisor support. These factors could play a role to control information overload and its effect on postgraduate students’ research performance. The research’s conceptual model was shaped based on synthesized perceptions extracted from data was collected and supported by relevant literature. Five of highly academician experts in the field assessed the conceptual model. Second, several practical insights and recommendations were provided to the decision makers and specialists in higher education institutions and academic filed on how to manage information overload and reduce its negative effects among postgraduate students.
Downloads
References
[1] Bawden D, Robinson L. The dark side of information: overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and
pathologies. Journal of information science. 2009; 35(2):180-91.
[2] Reller T. Elsevier publishing—a look at the numbers, and more. Key journal. 2016.
[3] Ifijeh G. Information explosion and university libraries: Current trends and strategies for intervention.
Chinese librarianship: An international electronic journal. 2010.
[4] Christian GR, Blumenthal C, Patterson M. The information explosion and the adult learner: Implications
for reference librarians. The Reference Librarian. 2001; 33(69-70):19-30.
[5] Kock N, Parente R, Verville J. Can Hofstede's model explain national differences in perceived information
overload? A look at data from the US and New Zealand. IEEE Transactions on Professional
Communication. 2008; 51(1):33-49.
[6] Mariamdaran SD, Veloo AA. Relationship between information overload syndrome (IOS) and stress
management of post graduate students. Paradigms. 2017; 11(2):253-8.
[7] binti Suhaimi FA, binti Hussin N. The Influence of Information Overload on Students‘ Academic
Performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2017;
7(8):2222-6990.
[8] Karr-Wisniewski P, Lu Y. When more is too much: Operationalizing technology overload and exploring its
impact on knowledge worker productivity. Computers in Human Behavior. 2010; 26(5):1061-72.
[9] Mayer RE, Moreno R. Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational
psychologist. 2003; 38(1):43-52.
[10] Junco R. In-class multitasking and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior. 2012;
28(6):2236-43.
[11] Al-Shamsi M. Addressing the physicians‘ shortage in developing countries by accelerating and reforming
the medical education: Is it possible? Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism. 2017;
5(4):210.
[12] Kabachinski J. Coping with information fatigue syndrome. Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology.
2004; 38(3):209-12.
[13] Zhang S, Zhao L, Lu Y, Yang J. Do you get tired of socializing? An empirical explanation of discontinuous usage behaviour in social network services. Information & Management. 2016; 53(7):904-14.
[14] Chen C-Y, Pedersen S, Murphy KL. The influence of perceived information overload on student
participation and knowledge construction in computer-mediated communication. Instructional Science.
2012; 40(2):325-49.
[15] Jacoby J, Speller DE, Kohn CA. Brand choice behavior as a function of information load. Journal of
marketing research. 1974; 11(1):63-9.
[16] Klausegger C, Sinkovics RR, ―Joy‖ Zou H. Information overload: a cross-national investigation of
influence factors and effects. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 2007; 25(7):691-718.
[17] Krishen AS, Raschke RL, Kachroo P. A feedback control approach to maintain consumer information load
in online shopping environments. Information & management. 2011; 48(8):344-52.
[18] Özkan E, Tolon M. The Effects of information overload on consumer confusion: An examination on user
generated content. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic & Administrative Studies. 2015;
29(1):27-51.
[19] Jacoby J, Speller DE, Berning CK. Brand choice behavior as a function of information load: Replication
and extension. Journal of consumer research. 1974; 1(1):33-42.
[20] Malhotra NK, Jain AK, Lagakos SW. The information overload controversy: An alternative viewpoint.
Journal of Marketing. 1982; 46(2):27-37.
[21] Muller TE. Buyer response to variations in product information load. Journal of applied psychology. 1984;
69(2):300.
[22] Eppler MJ, Mengis J. A framework for information overload research in organizations. Università della
Svizzera italiana; 2003.
[23] Loan FA. Gender Variability in Internet Use of the College Students. Journal of Society in Kashmir. 2011;
1:156-64.
[24] Blummer B, M. Kenton J. Reducing patron information overload in academic libraries. College &
Undergraduate Libraries. 2014; 21(2):115-35.
[25] Du Toit AS. Using the open Web as an information resource and scholarly Web search engines as retrieval
tools for academic and research purposes. South African Journal of Information Management. 2010;
12(1):1-6.
[26] Nazim M. Information searching behavior in the Internet age: A users‘ study of Aligarh Muslim University.
The International Information & Library Review. 2008; 40(1):73-81.
[27] Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches: Sage
publications; 2017.
[28] Marshall C, Rossman GB. Designing qualitative research: Sage publications; 2014.
[29] Maxwell JA. Designing a qualitative study. The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods. 2008;
2:214-53.
[30] Moustakas C. Phenomenological research methods: Sage; 1994.
[31] Van Manen M. Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy: Routledge;
2016.
[32] Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches: Rowman &
Littlefield; 2017.
[33] Tongco MDC. Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and
applications. 2007; 5:147-58.
[34] Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research.
2005; 15(9):1277-88.
[35] Kumar A, Maskara S. Coping up with the Information Overload in the Medical Profession. Journal of
Biosciences and Medicines. 2015; 3(11):124.
[36] Yan Y, Zha D, Yan A, Zhang Q. Exploring the effect of individual differences on self-efficacy in getting
information. Information Development. 2016; 32(4):1097-108.
[37] Bishop D. Information overload, and how to lighten it. Möbius: A Journal for Continuing Education
Professionals in Health Sciences. 1986; 6(3):47-53.
[38] Savolainen R. Cognitive barriers to information seeking: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Information
Science. 2015; 41(5):613-23.
[39] Warwick C, Rimmer J, Blandford A, Gow J, Buchanan G. Cognitive economy and satisficing in
information seeking: A longitudinal study of undergraduate information behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2009; 60(12):2402-15.
[40] Rowlands I, Nicholas D, Huntington P. The information behaviour of the researcher of the future. 2007.
[41] Harrison N. Online searching strategies for engineering students. Engineering education. 2009; 4(1):68-72.
[42] Edmunds A, Morris A. The problem of information overload in business organisations: a review of the
literature. International journal of information management. 2000; 20(1):17-28.
[43] Schultz U, Vandenbosch B. Information Overload in a Groupware Environment: Now you see it, now you
don't. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce. 1998; 8(2):127-48.
[44] Faux D. Information overload. Medical Teacher. 2000; 22(1):5-6.
[45] Hemp P. Death by information overload. Harvard business review. 2009; 87(9):82-9, 121.
[46] Farhoomand AF, Drury DH. Overload. Communications of the ACM. 2002; 45(10):127.
[47] Association AL. American library association presidential committee on information literacy. http://www.
ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/whitepapers/presidential htm.1989.
[48] Reid E. Malaysia's Multimedia Super Corridor and Roles of Information Professionals. 1998.
[49] Edzan N, Saad MSM. NILA: A national information literacy agenda for Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of
Library & Information Science. 2005; 10(1):91-103.
[50] Bawden D, Holtham C, Courtney N, editors. Perspectives on information overload. Aslib Proceedings;
1999: MCB UP Ltd.
[51] Eppler MJ, Mengis J. The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization
science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The information society. 2004; 20(5):325-44.
[52] Pajares F, Valiante G. Grade level and gender differences in the writing self-beliefs of middle school
students. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1999; 24(4):390-405.
[53] Schunk DH. Self-efficacy and education and instruction. Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment:
Springer; 1995. p. 281-303.
[54] Armstrong SJ. The impact of supervisors' cognitive styles on the quality of research supervision in
management education. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2004; 74(4):599-616.
[55] Fang S. A survey of teacher-student style mismatches. Higher Education of Social Science. 2012; 3(1):5-
12.
[56] Zhang, M, Ma, J, Liu, Z, Sun, J, Silva, T. A research analytics framework‐supported recommendation approach for supervisor selection. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2016; 47(2):403-20.
[57] Naveed MA. Exploring information seeking anxiety among research students in Pakistan. Libri. 2016; 66(1):73-82.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
