Perceptions of a Norwegian clubhouse among its members: A psychometric evaluation of a user satisfaction tool
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/dc39mk82Keywords:
clubhouse,, factor analysis,, psychometric properties, psychosocial rehabilitation,, user satisfaction, validityAbstract
Survey tools to assess user satisfaction have gained increased attention as meaningful sources of information for quality assurance and development of health care services. Several tools are developed, but these mostly refer to clinical settings and therefore address patients receiving treatment within these settings. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of a survey instrument used to assess user satisfaction among members of a clubhouse and possibly to improve the instrument. Principal Components Analysis was used to assess the instrument’s factor structure, and Cronbach’s Alpha was used to assess internal consistency of the scale items. The results showed that the scales improved their psychometric properties if two items were removed from the tool, and that two different factor structures may be applied. In conclusion, the survey tool may serve as a means to assess clubhouse members’ satisfaction with various aspects of the clubhouse
Downloads
References
Al-Abri, R., & Al-Balushi, A. (2013). Patient satisfaction survey as a tool towards quality improvement. Oman Medical Journal, 19(2), 3-7.
Almeida, R. S., Bourliataux- Lajoinie, S., & Martins, M. (2015). Satisfaction measurement instruments for healthcare service users: A systematic review. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 31(1), 11-25.
doi:10.1590/0102-311X00027014
Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16(2), 296-298.
Bonsaksen, T., Fouad, M., Skarpaas, L. S., Nordli, H., Fekete, O., & Stimo, T. (2016). Characteristics of Norwegian clubhouse members and factors associated with their participation in work and education. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(11), 669-676. doi:10.1177/0308022616639977
Boyer, L., Baumstarck- Barrau, K., Cano, N., Zendjidjian, X., Belzeaux, R., Limousin, S., . . . Auquier, P. (2009). Assessment of psychiatric inpatient satisfaction: A systematic review of self-reported instruments. European Psychiatry, 24(8), 540-549. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.05.011
Cerny, B. A., & Kaiser, H. F. (1977). A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12(1), 43-47. doi:10.1207/s15237906mbr1201_3
Clubhouse International. (2016). International standards for clubhouse programs. Retrieved from https://www.clubhouse- intl.org/documents/standards_2016_eng.pdf
Clubhouse International. (2017). Creating community: Changing the world of mental health. Retrieved from http://clubhouse-intl.org/what-we-do/what-clubhouses-do/
Crow, R., Gage, H., Hampson, S., Hart, J., Kimber, A., Storey, L., & Thomas, H. (2002). The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment, 6(32), 1-244.
Doyle, A., Lanoil, J., & Dudek, K. J. (2013). Fountain House: Creating community in mental health practice. New York: Columbia University Press.
Fekete, O., Kinn, L. G., Larsen, T. M. B., & Langeland, E. (2018). Exploring the clubhouse model in a salutogenic perspective (submitted for publication).
Fontenehus Norge (2017). http://www.fontenehus.no
Garbo, G. L., & Jackbo, A. (2012). A source of growth. The Clubhouse - a work community for persons with mental health challenges [En kilde til vekst. Fontenehuset - et arbeidsfellesskap for mennesker med psykiske utfordringer]. Oslo: Oslo Clubhouse [Fontenehuset i Oslo].
Gonzalez, N, Quintana, J. M., Bilbao, A., Escobar, A., Aizpuru, F., Thompson, A., Esteban, C., San Sebastian, J. A. & de la Sierra, E. (2005). Development and validation of an in- patient satisfaction questionnaire. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 17 (6), 465-472
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185. doi:10.1007/BF02289447
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36. doi:10.1007/BF02291817 McKay, C., Nugent, K. L., Johnsen, M., Eaton, W. W., & Lidz, C. W. (2016). A systematic review of evidence for the
clubhouse model of psychosocial rehabilitation. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1-20. doi:10.1007/s10488-016-0760-3
Propst, R. N. (1997). Stages in realizing the international diffusion of a single way of working: The clubhouse model. New Directions for Mental Health Services (74), 53-66.
Raeburn, T., Halcomb, E., Walter, G., & Cleary, M. (2013). An overview of the clubhouse model of psychiatric rehabilitation. Australasian Psychiatry, 21(4), 376-378. doi:10.1177/1039856213492235
Sitzia, J. (1999). How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 11(4), 319-328. doi:10.1093/intqhc/11.4.319
Stimo, T., Jarål, G. B., Ellestad, A. K., Ellingham, B., Skarpaas, L. S., & Bonsaksen, T. (2015). The Clubhouse model in Norway: A method in harmony with occupational therapy theory [in Norwegian: Fontenehusmodellen i Norge: En metode i harmoni med tenkning i ergoterapifaget]. Ergoterapeuten, 58(4), 22-30.
Sverdrup, S., Myrvold, T. M., & Kristofersen, L. B. (2005). User participation and mental health. Oslo: NIBR-report 2005:6.
Thørrisen, M. M., Nordli, H., Fekete, O., & Bonsaksen, T. (2018). Systematically measuring user experiences among members of a clubhouse for psychosocial rehabilitation: A psychometric evaluation [in Norwegian: Systematisk måling av brukererfaringer blant medlemmer på Klubbhus for psykososial rehabilitering: En psykometrisk vurdering] (in press).
Tidsskrift for omsorgsforskning.
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 432-442. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
