The Effects of Robotics on Fully Residential School Students’ Science Process Skills

Authors

  • Hafzan Ibrahim Department of Educational Sciences, Mathematics and Multimedia Creative, Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia Author
  • Mohamad Bilal Ali Department of Educational Sciences, Mathematics and Multimedia Creative, Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia Author
  • Fatin Aliah Phang Abdullah Department of Educational Sciences, Mathematics and Multimedia Creative, Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia Author
  • Norazrena Abu Samah Department of Educational Sciences, Mathematics and Multimedia Creative, Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/xhs18f50

Keywords:

Robotics, Physics Education, Science Process Skills

Abstract

Recently, using robotics in school education as innovation in learning and instructional for teaching purpose has become one of the main concerns among researchers. Robotics in education provides a way of learning that seems to be particularly attractive to students who are struggling with conventional school methods. Therefore, this research proposes an approach to use robotics as a tool to enhance science process skills which is one component of scientific skills. As a result, research related to the Quality Answers SPM in Physics in Malaysian Certificate of Education student which show the level of students' achievement is low. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of using robotics in science process skills among Fully Residential School student. In this research, constructivist methodologies for integrating robotics in kinematics in Physics class are suggested. The instrument used in this study is Integrated Process Skills Test II, a paper and pencil multiple-choice test to measure the acquisition of the integrated science process skills. This paper explains how the robotics positively changed the effect. Thus, efforts to increase the level of science process skills should be taken to produce individual who are excellent in Science and Mathematics. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Aktamis, H., & Ergin, O. (2008). The effect of scientific process skills education on students scientific

attitudes and academic achievement. In Asia Pasific Forum on Science Teaching.

[2] Alimisis, D. (2012). Robotics in education & education in robotics shifting focus from technology to

pedagogy. (7–14).

[3] Barak, M., & Zadok, Y. (2009). Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and

problem solving. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(3), 289–307.

[4] Capp, R. (2009). No titleprocess skills practise and standardized test. Science and Children, 46(5), 28–30.

[5] Mathers, N., Goktogen, A., Rankin, J., & Anderson, M. (2012). Robotic mission to Mars, Hands-on, mindson, web-based learning. Acta Astronautica, 80, 124–131.

[6] Muhammad Faizal, G., Saedah, S., Radzuan, K., Husaina Banu, K., Shahril, M., & Faisol, I. (2013).

Amalan sekolah cemerlang di sekolah berasrama penuh dan sekolah menengah kebangsaan agama , satu

perbandingan. The Online Journal of Islamic Education, 1(2), 30–50.

[7] Ong Eng Tek, Tuang, W.Y., Sopia Md Yassin, Sadiah Baharom, Asmayati Yahya, & Said., Z.M. (2012).

Malaysian-based science process skills inventory, development, validation and utilisation. Current

Reseaarch in Malaysia, 1(1).

[8] Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). . Situating constructionism in ablex publishing corporation constructionism.

Westport: Amerika Syarikat.

[9] Rohana Mohd Atan, & Shaharom Noordin. (2008). Hubungan antara amalan kerja amali degan pencapaian

pelajar tingkatan empat dalam tajuk daya in seminar kebangsaan pendidikan sains dan matematik.

Universiti Tekologi Malaysia.

[10] Shih, B., Chen, T., Wang, S., & Chen, C. (2013). The exploration of applying lego nxt in the situated

science and technology learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(1), 73–91.

[11] Stohr-Hunt, P.M. (1996). An Analysis of Frequency of Hands-on Experience aand Science Achievement.

Journal of Research in Science Teaching., 33, 101-109.

[12] Sullivan, F.R. (2008). Robotics and science literacy , thinking skills, science process skills and systems

understanding. 45(3), 373–394.

[13] Tek, O.E., & Mohamad., M.A.J. (2013). Pembinaan dan penentusahan instrumen kemahiran proses sains untuk sekolah menengah. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering, 66(1), 7–20.

[14] Williams, D.C., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., & Ford, M.J. (2007). Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp. 40(2), 201–216.

[15] Zurida, I., Mohd, A.S., & Ahmad, N.M.Z. (2005). Kesan Pengajaran Kontekstual ke atas Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Fizik. Jurnal Pendidik Dan Pendidikan, 20(1995), 43–52.

Downloads

Published

29.02.2020

How to Cite

Ibrahim, H., Bilal Ali, M., Aliah Phang Abdullah, F., & Abu Samah, N. (2020). The Effects of Robotics on Fully Residential School Students’ Science Process Skills. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 833-837. https://doi.org/10.61841/xhs18f50