Lecturers' and Learners' Perceptions on the 'New Headway'Curriculum within the Framework of Higher Education Reform at Erbil Polytechnic University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/zs363f49Keywords:
ELT, Curriculum Evaluation, Education, Reform, Learners' and Lecturers' Perceptions.Abstract
The Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Kurdistan Regional Government (MoHESR-KRG) initiated a reform policy in order to introduce international standards of quality to higher education. The reform policy aims to enhance the English language curricula. The reform process started in 2009 and the main purpose of the English language reform was to improve students’ language use and skills for academic purposes. This research emphasises the implications of the new curriculum of English language for freshmen learners at Erbil Polytechnic University (EPU). Learners' perspective on the course content, course objectives, as well as the lecturers’ method of teaching are evaluated through two conducted quantitative questionnaires. In a total of 178 learners, 102 learners responded to the first questionnaire, and 10 lecturers responded to the second questionnaire with approximately similar questions on the topics being investigated. The research concluded that the majority of both the learners and lecturers had positive attitudes on the course book design, content and the methodology adopted for teaching the materials. The results of the study also show that there is a significant improvement in learners' speaking, listening and reading skills while studying the course materials.
Downloads
References
[1] Ali, S. O. (2015). Higher Education Reform: A Study of Quality Assurance and Reform Policy of Higher Education in the Kurdistan
Region: Iraq. (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
[2] Al-Jardani, K. S. (2012). Developing a framework for curriculum evaluation in Oman. English Linguistics Research, 1(2), 72-87.
[3] Al-Jardani, K. S. (2012b). English language curriculum evaluation in Oman. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(5).
[4] Brown, J. D. (1995). The Elements of Language Curriculum. A Systematic Approach to Program Development. Heinle and Heinle
Publishers: Boston.
[5] Deci, E. L. (1995). Why we do what we do: Understanding self-motivation. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
[6] Ellis, R. (2011). Macro- and micro-evaluations of task-based teaching. In Tomlinson, B. (eds.), Materials development in language
teaching (2nd ed., pp. 1–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[7] Fakeye, D. (2010). Students’ personal variables as correlates of academic achievement in English as a Second Language in Nigeria.
Journal of Social Sciences, 22(3), 205-211.
[8] Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.
[9] Gifford, B.R., and O'Connor, M.C. (1991). Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction. Norwood,
Mass.: Kluwer Publishers.
[10] Jang, H. (2008). Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 100, 798–811.
[11] Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Halusic, M. (2016). A New Autonomy-Supportive Way of Teaching That Increases Conceptual Learning: Teaching
in students' preferred ways. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(4), 686-701, DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2015.1083522
[12] Krashen, S. D. (1984). The input hypothesis: an update. In Alatis, J. E. (eds.), Linguistics and language pedagogy: A state of the art (pp.
409-427). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
[13] Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: issues and implications. New York: Prentice Hall
[14] Marsh, C. (2004). Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum (3rd ed.). Routledge Falmer: London and New York.
[15] Nichols, B, Shidaker, S, Johnson, G., and Singer, K. (2006). Managing Curriculum and Assessment. A Practitioner's Guide. Linworth
Books: Ohio.
[16] Perkins, D. (1993). Teaching for understanding. The Professional Journal of the American Federation of Teachers, 1(3), 2-20.
[17] Perkins, D. N. (1992). Smart schools: From training memories to educating minds: New York: The Free Press.
[18] Perrone, V. (1991). A letter to teachers: Reflections on schooling and the art of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
[19] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
[20] Shams, M. (2008). Students’ attitudes, motivation, and anxiety towards English language learning. Journal of Research, 2(2), 121-144.
[21] Tavil, Z. (2009). Parental Attitudes towards English Education for Kindergarten Students in Turkey. Kastamonu Education Journal, 17(1),
331-340.
[22] Tomlinson, B. (2011). Introduction: Principles and procedure of material development. In Tomlinson, B. (eds.), Materials development in
language teaching (2nd ed., pp. 1–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[23] Tomlinson, B. 2001. Materials development. In R. Carter and D. Nunan (eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of
Other Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[24] Tomlinson, B. and Masuhara, H. (2004). Developing Language Course Materials. Singapore:RELC.
[25] Tylor, P. & Maor, D. (2000) Assessing the efficacy of online teaching with the Constructivist On-Line Learning Environment Survey.
Journal proceedings.
[26] Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Matos, L. (2005). Examining the motivational impact of intrinsic versus intrinsic
goal framing and autonomy-supportive versus internally controlling communication style on early adolescents’ academic achievement.
Child Development, 2, 483–501.
[27] Volman, M. (2005). A variety of roles for a new type of teacher Educational technology and the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher
Education 21, 15-31
[28] Yoshida, K. (2009). MEXT’s new path to learning and its impact on Japan’s English education.Plenary presentation at the Nakasendo
2009conference, Tokyo, Japan
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
