COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT APPROACH IN THE CONSERVATION OF HERITAGE BUILDINGS IN TAIPING, MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/z279av67Keywords:
community engagement, decision making, heritage building, conservation, TaipingAbstract
Community engagement has been revealed as a significant approach for heritage building conservation. This study aims to identify the extent of local community involvement in the community engagement efforts that had been undertaken to conserve heritage buildings in Taiping. It also seeks to determine the relationship between the perceived costs and benefits of the project and the level of involvement in decision-making. Besides, the relationship between the level of involvement and support of the community for the conservation of heritage buildings was also explored. The data collection methods used were questionnaire surveys and interviews. The questionnaire survey forms were distributed to 82 private building owners of gazetted heritage buildings in Taiping. Then, interviews were conducted among eight private building owners who are directly involved in the conservation of heritage buildings and an officer of the local authority for validation purposes. The findings obtained from the quantitative and qualitative analyses show that the level of community involvement in conserving heritage buildings was low, as their opinions were not taken into account throughout the decision-making process. The community support was also low due to the losses incurred. Perceived benefits and perceived loss were found to have a significant relationship with the level of community involvement.
Downloads
References
[1] Bakri, A. F., Ibrahim, N., Ahmad, S. S., & Zaman, N. Q. (2015). Public Perception on the Cultural Significance of Heritage Buildings in Kuala Lumpur. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences (202), 294–302.
[2] Fielden, B.M. (2000). Conservation of historic buildings. Architectural Press, Oxford.
[3] Isa, N.K.M., Yunos, M.Y.M., Ismail, N.A., Ismail, K, Marzuki, M., & Ibrahim, M.H. (2015). Establishing a Community Engagement Framework for Sustainable Tourism: The Case of Taiping Heritage Town Malaysia. Advances in Environmental Biology, 9 (27): 501-509.
[4] Adeyinka-Ojo, S.F., Lattimore, C.K., & Nair, V. (2013). “Conceptualizing a Framework to Analyse the Factors Influencing the Local Community’s Support for Sustainable Rural Tourism Development," in T.R. Tiller [ed.] Conference Proceedings of BEST EN Think Tank XIII, Sydney: University of Technology Sydney, 7-40.
[5] Alberti, F.G. & Giusti, J.D. (2012). Cultural heritage, tourism, and regional competitiveness: the Motor Valley cluster. City, Culture, and Society, vol. 3, pp. 261-27.
[6] Nunkoo, R. & Ramkissoon, H. (2011). Developing a community support model for tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 964-988.
[7] Gursoy, D., Chi, C.G., & Dyer, P. (2010). Local’s attitudes toward mass and alternative tourism: the case of Sunshine Coast, Australia. Journal of Travel Research, 49: 381-394.
[8] George, E.W. (2010). Intangible cultural heritage, ownership, copyright, and tourism. International Journal of Cultural. Tourism and Hospitality Research. Vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 376-388.
[9] The State of Queensland (2017). Draft a community engagement toolkit for planning. Queensland. Retrieved: 24/1/2019, from http://www.betterplanning.qld.gov.au/resources/planning/better-planning/draftcommunity-engagement-toolkit.pdf.
[10] Byrd, E.T. (2007). Stakeholders in sustainable tourism development and their roles: applying stakeholder theory to sustainable tourism development. Tourism Review, 62(2): 6-13.
[11] Lee, T.H. (2013). Influence Analysis of Community Residents Support for Sustainable Tourism Development. Tourism Management, 34: 37-46.
[12] Fyall, A., Garrod, B., & Wang, Y. (2012). Destination collaboration: a critical review of theoretical approaches to a multi-dimensional phenomenon. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 1: 10-26.
[13] Yunos, M.Y.M., Isa, N.K.M., & Ismail, N.A. (2015). Landscape Architect’s Perspective on Public Participation Technique in Landscape Planning and Design: A Case Study of Kuala Lumpur. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 747: 184-187.
[14] Ariffin, M.N. & Hussin, A.A. (2011). Program Pemuliharaan Taiping Bandar Warisanoleh Majlis Perbandaran Taiping. In Hussin, A.A. [Ed.] Pemuliharaandan Warisan di Malaysia. Penang: PenerbitUniversitiSains Malaysia.
[15] MPT (2008). Rancangan Kawasan Khas Kawasan Warisan Bandar Taiping. JabatanPerancangan dan Pembangunan Bandar MPT, Perak, Malaysia.
[16] JPBD(2015).LarutMatang Local Plan Report 2015 LaporanRancanganTempatanLarutMatang 2015]: Blok Perancangan Bandar Taiping.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
