CEO Power, Corporate Governance, Auditors’ Reputation, and its Effects on Corporate Islamic Bonds Rating
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/x542z396Keywords:
Islamic bonds rating, CEO power, Corporate governance, Auditors reputationAbstract
Islamic bonds, commonly known as "sukuk," are one of the capital market instruments that have come up as one of the important components in the global Islamic financial system and have become an innovative investment instrument for recent years. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of CEO power, corporate governance, auditors reputation, and firm characteristics as control variables (productivity, leverage, and firm size) on the corporate Islamic bond rating listed on the Indonesian stock exchange for the period of 2013-2017. This research uses the ordinal logit regression model to find out variables that have a powerful effect on the corporate Islamic bond rating. Samples were taken from 11 firms that issued Islamic bonds by using the purposive sampling technique. The research finding was denoted that CEO power, board size, and leverage have no effect on the Islamic bond's rating. This result was explained by saying that CEO power is measured by CEO tenure; board size and leverage do not determine the better corporate Islamic bond rating. Meanwhile, auditors reputation, board composition, productivity, and firm size have a positive effect on the corporate Islamic bond rating.
Downloads
References
[1] Adams, R., Almeida, H., Ferreira, D., 2005. Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. Review Finance Study 18, 1403–1432
[2] Alali, F., Anandarajan, A., and Jiang, W. 2012. The effect of corporate governance on firm‘s credit ratings: further evidence using governance scores in the United States. Accounting and Finance, Vol. 52(2), 291-312.
[3] Alam, N. Hassan, M. K., & Haque, M. A. 2013. Are Islamic bonds different from conventional bonds? International evidence from capital market tests. Borsa Istanbul Review, 13, 22-29.
[4] Albuquerque, R., Miao, J.J., 2013. CEO power, compensation, and governance. Ann. Econ. Financ. 14, 417–452.
[5] Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., Kelly, S., Mcnamara, R., and Nagel, S. 2012. Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. Accounting & Finance, Vol. 52(4), 971-1000.
[6] Altwijry, O.I. 2015. The role of corporate governance and ownership in unconventional bond rating: empirical evidence from companies listed on Bursa Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Economics Banking and Finance, Vol. 11(2), 105-117.
[7] Aman, H., and Nguyen, P. (2013). Does good governance matter to debt holders? Evidence from the credit ratings of Japanese firms. Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 29(1), 14-34.
[8] Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D.W., and LaFond, R. 2006. The effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 42, No. 1/2, 203-243.
[9] Barclay, M.J., Smith, J.C.W., and Morellec, E. 2006. On the debt capacity of growth options. The Journal of Business, Vol. 79(1), 37-60.
[10] Becker, Bo, and Milbourn, Todd. 2011. How did increased competition affect credit ratings? Journal of Financial Economics 101, 493-514
[11] Bhojraj, S., and Sengupta, P. 2003. Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: the role of institutional investors and outside directors. The Journal of Business, Vol. 76(3), 455-476.
[12] Bradley, M., Chen, D., 2011. Corporate governance and the cost of debt: evidence from director limited liability and indemnification provisions. Journal of Corporate Finance 17, 83–107.
[13] Butar Butar, S. 2014b. Auditor's reputation, Board of Commissioners characteristics, and informativeness of earnings [Reputasi Auditor, Karakteristik Dewan Komisaris, Dan Keinformatifan Laba]. Business Accounting Journal 13 (2), 25-43.
[14] Cha, M., Hwang, K., & Yeo, Y. 2016. Relationship Between Audit Opinion And Credit Rating: Evidence From Korea. The Journal of Applied Business Research, Volume 32 (2), 621-634.
[15] Elhaj, M. A., Muhamed, N. A., & Ramli, N. M. 2017. The effects of board attributes on Sukuk rating. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Emerald Publishing Limited.
[16] Erdawati, Adel, J. F., & Rambe, P. A. 2018. Effects of Auditor Reputation, Liquidity, Profitability, and Leverage on Banking Bonds Rating Listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2013-2016 [Pengaruh Reputasi Auditor, Likuiditas, Profitabilitas, dan Leverage Terhadap Peringkat Obligasi Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2013-2016]. Accounting Journal.
[17] Homsi, M. A., Sori, Z. M., & Mohamad, S. 2017. Determinants of Sukuk Credit Ratings: The Malaysia Case. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320559454.
[18] Hussain, H.I., Grabara, J., Razimi, M.S.A., & Sharif, S.P. (2019), Sustainability of Leverage Levels in Response to Shocks in Equity Prices: Islamic Finance as a Socially Responsible Investment, Sustainability, 11, 3260.
[19] Jiraporn, P., and Ning. 2011. Dividend Payouts and Corporate Governance Quality: An Empirical Investigation. The Financial Review 46, 251–279
[20] Khan, A.G. 2012. The relationship of capital structure decisions with firm performance: a study of the engineering sector of Pakistan. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, Vol. 2(1), 245.
[21] Kilapong, G.J.V., and Setiawati, L. 2012. The effect of accounting and non-accounting information on the rating of a company's bond. 6th Asian Business Research Conference, Bangkok, 1-7.
[22] Kisgen, D. J. 2006. Credit Ratings and Capital Structure. The Journal of Finance, Vol. LXI (3), 1035-1072.
[23] Kuang, Y. F., Qin, B. 2013. Credit ratings and CEO risk-taking incentives. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1524-1559.
[24] Listokin., Y., and Taibleson, B. 2010. If you misrate, then you lose: improving credit rating accuracy through incentive compensation. Yale Journal on Regulation 27(1), 91-113.
[25] Liu, Y., & Jiraporn, P. 2010. The effect of CEO power on bond ratings and yields. Journal of Empirical Finance 17, 744–762.
[26] Pandutama, A. 2012. Factors Affecting the Prediction of Bond Ratings in Manufacturing Companies in the IDX [Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Prediksi Peringkat Obligasi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di BEI]. Accounting Student Scientific Journal, Vol. 1(4), 82-87.
[27] Pranoto, G. E., Anggraini, R., & Takidah, E. 2017. Effect of Profitability, Company Size, Productivity, and Auditor Reputation on Sukuk Ranking [Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan, Produktivitas, dan Reputasi Auditor Terhadap Peringkat Sukuk]. Wahana Accounting Scientific Journal, Vol 12 (1), 13-27.
[28] Purwaningsih, S. 2013. Factors Affecting Sukuk Ratings Viewed From Accounting and Non-Accounting Factors [Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Rating Sukuk Yang Ditinjau Dari Faktor Akuntansi Dan NonAkuntansi]. Accounting Analysis Journal, Vol. 2(3), 360-368.
[29] Ross, Andrew, and Crossan, Kenny. 2012. A review of the influence of corporate governance on the banking crises in the United Kingdom and Germany, Corporate Governance. The international journal of business in society, Vol. 12(2), 215–225.
[30] Sameh Ouni, A. 2010. Financial Attributes, Corporate Governance, and Target Credit. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 123-135.
[31] Saudi, M.H.M., Sinaga, O., & Rospinoedji, D., The role of tax education in supply chain management: A case of Indonesian supply chain companies, Polish Journal of Management Studies 18(2):304-319, December 2018.
[32] Shaheen, R., and Javid, A.Y. 2014. Effect of Credit Rating on Firm Performance and Stock Return: Evidence Form KSE-Listed Firms. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad. available at: https://doi.org/104.
[33] The Indonesia Capital Market Institute. 2016. Knowledge about securities traded in the capital market. WPPE/PTE module.
[34] Vina. 2017. Analysis the Effect of Auditor Reputation, Bonds Age, Liquidity, Growth, and Company Productivity on the Bonds Rating at Go Public Growth Listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange [Analisis Pengaruh Reputasi Auditor, Umur Obligasi, Likuiditas, Growth, dan Produktivitas Perusahaan Terhadap Peringkat Obligasi Pada Pertumbuhan Go Public Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia]. Business
Accounting Journal, Vol. XV (30), 104-125.
[35] Weber, J. 2006. Discussion of the effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42, 245–254.
[36] Widowati, D., Nugrahanti, Y., & Kristanto, A. B. 2013. Analysis of Financial and Non-Financial Factors that Influence the Prediction of Bond Rankings in Indonesia [Analisis Faktor Keuangan dan Non Keuangan Yang Berpengaruh Pada Prediksi Peringkat Obligasi di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Non Keuangan Yang Terdaftar di BEI dan di Daftar Peringkat PT. Pefindo 2009-2011]. Management Journal,
Vol 13(1), 35-54.
[37] Winanti, E., Nurlaela, S., & Titisari, K. H. 2017. The Effect of Liquidity Ratio, Productivity Ratio, Profitability Ratio, and Solvability Ratio on Sukuk Ranking [Pengaruh Rasio Likuiditas, Rasio Produktivitas, Rasio Profitabilitas, dan Rasio Solvabilitas Terhadap Peringkat Sukuk]. Tax and Accounting Journal, Vol. 18 (1), 130-139.
[38] Zhang, E., & Khurana, I. 2015. Does CEO Tenure Influence Corporate Bond Rating Properties?. The Faculty of the Graduate School, University of Missouri-Columbia.
[39] Krymov, V.G., Yurin, D.A., Kononenko, S.I., Maxim, E.A., Yurina, N.A. Changes of weight indicators in sturgeon fish when using combined feeds with various protein and fat contents in closed water supply installations (2018). International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 10 (4), pp. 316-322. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-
85057211554&doi=10.31838%2fijpr%2f2018.10.04.029&partnerID=40&md5=25a841a7694780668625a2d40c858045
[40] Raheem Farista, Pradeep M. Muragundi (2016) practical possibilities to empower patients in management of inflammatory bowel disease. Journal of Critical Reviews, 3 (4), 1-5.
[41] Bhatia S, Namdeo AG, Nanda S. "Factors Effecting the Gelling and Emulsifying Properties of a Natural Polymer." Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy 1.1 (2010), 86-92. Print. doi:10.4103/0975-8453.59517
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.