Advocate Anomalies in Money Laundring Practices in Indonesia: Analysis of Legal System Theory to Reporting Function in Government Regulation No. 43 Year 2015
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/f110fe03Keywords:
Money Laundring, Advocate, PPATK, PP Number 43 Year 2015Abstract
This study focuses on how anomalies advocate in money laundring practices in Indonesia by providing analysis of the law and reporting functions in government regulation No. 43 year 2015. Government Regulation No. 43 year 2015 is obliging the advocate profession to report suspicious financial transactions to the PPATK. This research also aims to determine the implementation of PPATK in carrying out its duties as one of the institutions that supervise the travel flow of financial funds in Indonesia, especially from various professions that have potential harm to the country, Besides, also know the policies and applications and attitudes of the advocacy profession who are often involved in the practice of money laundring, as well as the conflict of interest that occurs from the PPATK with the advocate. This certainly caused PPATK to see the flow of funds often clash between the law and government regulation number 43-year 2015. With this law the confidentiality of the advocate profession has been assured, because the advocate has an internationally known lawyer-client privilege principle, which is not to convey the Considered confidential (confidential) except for the permits or orders of his clients so feared from this clash suspected the occurrence of business to do money laundring practices.
Downloads
References
[1] “Adjie, Indriyanto Seno. 2001. Prospektif Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: CV Rizkita.”
[2] “Armanda, Rizky, and Ahmad Jamaan. 2015. ‘Pengaruh Financial Action Task Force Nn Money
Laundering Terhadap Terbentuknya Undang-Undang Pencucian Uang Di Indonesia.’ JOM Fakultas Ilmu
Sosial Dan Politik 2 (2): 1–13.”
[3] “Ediwarman. 2015. Monograf Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Panduan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis Dan
Disertasi). Medan: PT Sofmedia.”
[4] “Eleanora, Fransiska Novita. 2019. ‘Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.’ Jurnal Hukum 26 (2): 640–53.”
[5] “Husein, Yunus. 2003. ‘PPATK: Tugas, Wewenang Dan Peranannya Dalam Memberantas Tindak Pidana
Pencucian Uang.’ Jakarta.”
[6] “Lilley, Peter. 2003. Dirty Dealing: The Untold Truth about Global Money Laundering, International
Crime and Terrorism. 2nd ed. London and Sterling: Kogan Page Limited.”
[7] “Mathilda, Fiorida. 2013. ‘Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Di Bidang Perbankan.’ SIGMA-Mu 5 (2): 55–
67.”
[8] “Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. 2004. Seluk Beluk Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dan Pembiayaan Terorisme. Jakarta: PT Pustaka Utama Grafiti.”
[9] “Stessens, Guy. 2000. Money Laundering A New International Law Enforcement Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.”
[10] “Utama, Paku. 2006. “Gatekeepers’ Roles as a Fundamental Key in Money Laundering.” Journal Indonesia Law Review 6 (2): 180–206. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v6n2.215.”
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
