A Comprehensive Review Of Potentiometric Biosensors

Authors

  • Dr. Arpit Singh Department of Chemistry, Dhanauri P.G. College, Dhanauri, Haridwar Author
  • Dr. Aishwarya Singh Department of Chemistry, Hariom Saraswati P.G. College, Dhanauri, Haridwar (UK) Author
  • Dr. Vibha Kumar Department of Chemistry, Sri Dev Suman Uttarakhand University, Badshahithol, Tehri Garhwal, Uttrakhand Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/V28I3/400434

Keywords:

Ion-selective electrode, bioreceptor, potentiometric biosensing, potentiometric biosensing.

Abstract

Potentiometry based on ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) has undergone a renaissance with improvements in the detection limits and selectivities of ISEs, the introduction of new materials, new sensing concepts (from conventional potentiometry to dynamic electrochemistry approaches), and deeper theoretical understanding and modelling of the potentiometric responses of ISEs. The most recent innovations support improvements in software for ion sensing and biosensing. Additionally, adaptable sensing techniques have been created for a wide range of various target molecules, including enzymes, antibodies, aptamers, and peptides, in response to the introduction of new receptors by using ISEs as powerful transducers. Current potentiometric biosensor trends are examined in this paper. Their applications in the biosensing of metal ions, small molecules, DNA, proteins, microorganisms, and poisons have been discussed. This review provides a forecast for potentiometric biosensing based on the integration of potentiometric ISEs with innovative materials and cutting-edge techniques. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Hrdlicka, J. Havei, C. Moreno and M. Valientc, Alia!' Sci., 7, 925 (1991).

2. Hulanicki, S. Geah and F. Longman, Pure Appl. Chem., 63, 1247 (1991 ).

3. J. Bard and L. R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods, Fundamentals and Applications, Wiley, New York (1980).

4. K. Lain, V. K. Gupta and J. R. Raisoni, Sensors, 4, 115 (2004).

5. K. Singh, P. Saxena, S. Mehtab and B. Gupta, Anal. Sei., 22, 1339 (2006).

6. K. Singh, R. Singh and P. Saxena, Sensors, 4, 187 (2004). [37. T. Rosatzin, E. Bakkcr, Y. Suzuki and W. Simon, Anal.

Chem. Acta, 280, 197 (1993).

7. Masuda, N. Nakamura and T. Tanaka, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 37, 239 (1973).

8. Mazzucotclli, F. Depaz, E. Magi and B. Frachc, Ana!.Sci., 8, 189 (1992).

9. Nann, I. Silvestri and W. Simon, Anal. Chem., 65,1662 (993).

10. R. Fakhari, M. R. Ganjali and M. Shamsipur, Anal. Chem., 69, 3693 (1997).

11. S. M. MontcnchTfo, A. N. Araujo and C. M. C. M. Couto, 1. Auram. Meth. Managem. Chem., 24, 105 (2002).

12. Bing Li, Yali Sun and Ming Yin, J. Anal. Al. Speclrom., 14, 1843 ( 1999).

13. M. A. Brett and A. M. Oliveira Brett, Electroanalysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998).

14. M. A. Brett, Pure Appl. Chem., 73, 1969 (2001). http//www.wikipcdia.com

15. Macca, Anal. Chim. Acta, 512, 183 (2004).

16. Chowdhury, T. Ogata, S. Kamata and K. Ohashi, Anal. ('hem., 68,366 (1996).

17. Skoog, D. M. West and F. J. Holler, Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry, Saunders College Publishing, USA (1996).

Downloads

Published

30.06.2024

How to Cite

Singh, A., Singh, A., & Kumar, V. (2024). A Comprehensive Review Of Potentiometric Biosensors. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 28(3), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.61841/V28I3/400434