10 Cs and its Effect on Employee Engagement – Findings among the Generation Y IT Employees from Bangalore

Authors

  • Dr. Sweta Dixit Associate Professor, Sharda University Author
  • Dr. Alka Sharma Associate Professor, Galgotias University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/preq5e89

Keywords:

Employee Engagement, 10 C’s Workers Engagement, Generation Y

Abstract

 Employee engagement has received much consideration in both research and practice due to its prospect impact on various managerial outcomes. Much has been said about employees engagement since the term was first coined in 1990 by Kahn with relatively little pragmatic evidence on the same. Findings from the present survey are expected to enrich not only the available human resource literature on the subject but also will provide baseline to policy makers while formulating employee retention policies to be celebrated by workers of Generations Y in general and in Indian IT organisations in particular. So overall it will give focus on proactive steps do leaders need to take to develop the stage of workers who are engaging in their firm? Employee engagement refers to emotional attachment of employees towards their job as well as job environment and is considered as a measurable construct. Employees from the surveyed IT companies of Bangalore were found to be highly engaged towards their organisation. The following factors came out to be important constructs among others which resulted in high score of employee’s engagement towards their organisation – Connect, Congratulate, contribute, collaborate and confidence. Gen Y is more confident as compare to other generations and have high level of expectations from their employees. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Bakker A. what's more, Albrecht S. (2014) Work duty: current examples, Career progression worldwide

Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 4-15

[2] Bhatnagar J. (2009) Talent the board strategy of delegate duty in Indian ITES laborers: key to support,

Employee Relations, 29 (6), pp.: 640-663.

[3] Blessing White and HR Annexe Report, (2007). Asian Journal of Management Research, 94.

[4] Chamchan C. also, Kittisuksathit S. (2019) Generation Y Employees in Thai Workplaces: What Make

Them Stay or Leave, Asia-Pacific Social Science Review 19(1) 2019, pp. 50–68.

[5] Connor E. (2019) Exploring the Relationship between Exclusive Talent Management, Perceived

Organizational Justice and Employee Engagement: Bridging the Literature, Journal of Business Ethics,

Volume 156, pp.: 903–917.

[6] Damayanti N. Yahya K. moreover, Yean Tan F. (2019) Work Values, Emotional Intelligence, Work

Environment and Career Commitment among Gen Y, Vol. 3 No. 1

[7] Hassan H. also, Khawar S. (2018) Determinants of Employee Engagement Practices In IT Sector,

International Journal of sensible and development investigate Volume 7, Issue 5.

[8] Falcone P. (2006) Preserving on edge top performers: keep your top performers associated so they don't

escape once openings for work develop. HR Magazine

[9] Hay Group (2001). Interface with laborers and lift execution. Roughage Group.

[10] IRS (2004). It pays to talk: Gauging the business relationship. IRS Employme Review, 811: pp 9 – 16.

[11] Joo, B.K., and Mclean, G. N. (2006). Best business contemplates: a sensible model from a composing

review and a logical examination, Human Resource Development Review, 5 (2), pp 22857.

[12] Kahn, W.A. (1992). A movement of intensity. Various leveled Behavior Teaching Review, 14 (2): pp 2842.

[13] Lado, A. An., and Wilson, M. C. (1998). Human resource systems and continued focused piece of room: A

competency based perspective, Academy of Management Review, 19 (4), pp 699727.

[14] Lockwood, N.R. (2003). Capacity the administrators: driver for various leveled accomplishment HR

content Program. SHRM Research Quarterly. Pp-89-145.

[15] Luthans, F., and Peterson, S.J. (2000). Laborer duty and chief self-feasibility: proposals for authoritative

ampleness and headway, Journal of Management Development, 21 (5), pp 37687

[16] Macey, W.H., and Schneider, B. (2007). The Meaning of Employee Engagement, Industrial and

Organizational Psychology, (1): pp 335.

[17] McCashland, CR (1998), Core Components of the organization air: Linkages to purchaser unwaveringness

and advantage. Article Abstracts International. School Microfilms International, USA, 60 (12A):89.

[18] Schaufeli, W.B., and Bakker, A.B. (2003). UWES – Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, Preliminary manual

[Version 1]. Word related Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University

[19] Schaufeli, W.B and Bakker, A.B. (2001). Estimation of duty and burnout: A confirmative explanatory

procedure. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3: pp. 7192.

[20] Schein, E.H. (1975). Various leveled Psychology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

[21] Schein, E.H. (1988). Technique Consultation. Scrutinizing, Mss. Addison Wesley.

[22] Seijts, G.H., &Crim, D. (2007). What attracts laborers the most or, The Ten C's of agent Engagement? Ivey

Business Journal Online. Recuperated from ibjonline@ivey.ca.

[23] Shahruddin S., Daud N. (2018) Employee Engagement Determinants and Employee Retention: A Study

Among Generation Y Employees in Malaysia In: Noordin F., Othman A., Kassim E. (eds) pp-45-78

[24] The Gallup Organization (2004). Refered to in Crabtree, S (2004) Getting staff in the work place – Are

negative associations squelching benefit in your association?

[25] Towers, P. (2006). Ten phases to making an associated with workforce.

[26] Ludwick, P. (2006). Basically Say "Thankful. I invite it." PM: Public Management.

[27] Maitland, R. (2005). How playful laborers mean more prominent advantages. People Management, 14 July.

[28] Nowack, K. (2006). Agent duty, work satisfaction, upkeep and stress.

[29] Stairs, M., Galpin, M., Page, N., and Linley, A. (2008). Support on a sharp edge: The job of laborer duty in capacity the officials. Decision and Development Review, 22(5), pp-25-89.

Downloads

Published

29.02.2020

How to Cite

Dixit, S., & Sharma, A. (2020). 10 Cs and its Effect on Employee Engagement – Findings among the Generation Y IT Employees from Bangalore. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 366-374. https://doi.org/10.61841/preq5e89