Manufacturers Satisfaction on Third Party Logistics Providers’ Service Quality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/n6wdn319Keywords:
Logistics Service Quality, Malaysian Manufacturers, Third Party Logistics, Customer SatisfactionAbstract
Several authors have acknowledged logistics service quality as the determinant of customer satisfaction. By obtaining customer satisfaction, organizations will gain benefits such as higher profitability, retention of customers, a better reputation, and a better company image. In Malaysia, inconsistencies in logistics service quality are stated as one of the highest issues concerned among the Malaysian manufacturers. Therefore, the main objective of the study is to examine the level of customer satisfaction among manufacturers towards outbound logistics service quality delivered by third-party logistics service providers. Specifically, it undertook to determine whether delivery accuracy, product condition, quality of key contact personnel, responsiveness, and timeliness variables were potential determinants for overall customer satisfaction. A self-administered online and mail questionnaire was selected as a mode of data collection. A sample was gathered from the Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers 2009 directory. 166 responses were received out of 1500 questionnaires distributed. Data were analyzed by using structural equation modelling AMOS software. From the information gathered, 85.1% of the respondents are users of third-party logistics services. Most respondents have a high percentage of using outbound logistics services, more than inbound using logistics services. Key findings exhibit most of the respondents are generally satisfied with overall outbound third-party logistics services. Whereby, 52% of the responses are within the “slightly satisfied” level, and only 3% indicates slightly dissatisfaction with the 3PL services. Based on the means of satisfaction level, responsiveness is the highest rated component, followed by delivery accuracy, while product condition is the lowest ranked component. Furthermore, based on the SEM path significance analysis, it is discovered that responsiveness and timeliness are having a positive significant relationship with customer satisfaction and have a high impact to affect the level of satisfaction. The findings exhibit a similar pattern of timeliness impact towards customer satisfaction with earlier research from the 1990s in developed countries. Whereby, more recent studies in the United States indicate non-significance of timeliness. The results also depict the slow development of Malaysian logistics industries, whereby technical quality or operational issues are still the main concerns among customers. This study aligns with the needs for more exploration and expansion on utilizing more information technology among 3PL providers as to enhance punctuality and responsiveness.
Downloads
References
[1] M. Rafiq and H.S. Jaafar, Measuring Customers’ Perceptions of Logistics Service Quality of 3Pl Service
Providers, J. Bus. Logist., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 159–175, Sep. 2007.
[2] I. Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, A. Aranskis, and M. Litvinenko, Consumer Satisfaction with the Quality of
Logistics Services, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 110, no. 0, pp. 330–340, 2014.
[3] P. Wang and M. Gong, How Third Party Logistics providers manage relationship with customers — A
multiple case study, no. June, 2014.
[4] H. Doaei, A. Rezaei, and R. Khajei, The Impact of Relationship Marketing Tactics on Customer Loyalty:
The Mediation Role of Relationship Quality, Int. J. Bus. Adm., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 83–93, 2011.
[5] A. Yüksel and F. Yüksel, Consumer Satisfaction Theories: A Critical Review, Tour. Satisf. Complain.
Behav. Meas. Manag. Issues Tour. Hosp. Ind., no. 1984, pp. 65–88, 2008.
[6] E.W. Anderson, C. Fornell, and D.R. Lehmann, Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability:
Findings from Sweden, J. Mark., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 53–66, 1994.
[7] J. Juga, J. Juntunen, and M. Juntunen, Impact of service quality, image and relational aspects on
satisfaction and loyalty in logistics outsourcing relationships, Int. J. Shipp. Transp. Logist., vol. 4, no. 1, p.
17, 2012.
[8] T.M. John, J.F. Daniel, J.T. Mentzer, and D.J. Flint, Validity in logistics research, J. Bus. Logist., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 199, 1997.
[9] J.T. Mentzer, D.J. Flint, and G.T.M. Hult, ―Logistics Service Quality as a Segment-Customized Process,‖ J. Mark., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 82–104, Oct. 2001.
[10] J.T. Mentzer, M.B. Myers, and M.S. Cheung, Global market segmentation for logistics services, Ind.
Mark. Manag., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 15-20, Jan. 2004.
[11] D.M. Lambert and M.G. Enz, Industrial Marketing Management Issues in Supply Chain Management:
Progress and potential, Elsevier Inc., 2016.
[12] A.H.A. Bakar, I.L. Hakim, S.C. Chong, and B. Lin, Measuring supply chain performance among public
hospital laboratories, Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 75–97, 2010.
[13] D.J. Flint, E. Larsson, B. Gammelgaard, and J.T. Mentzer, ―Logistics Innovation: A Customer ValueOriented Social Process,‖ J. Bus. Logist., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 113–147, 2005.
[14] P.A. Bartlett, D.M. Julien, and T. S. Baines, Improving supply chain performance through improved
visibility, Int. J. Logist. Manag., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 294–313, 2007.
[15] C.C. Hsu, V.R. Kannan, K.C. Tan, and G.K. Leong, information sharing, buyer-supplier relationships, and
firm performance: A multi-region analysis, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 296–
310, 2008.
[16] H.S. Jaafar, N. Faisol, A. Muhammad, U.I. Ooi, S. Mohamad, A. Abu Bakar, A.K. Rahmat, M.Z. Jusoh, S.
N.A. Azman, T.N.A. Tengku Aziz, and N.B. Sarbani, The Logistics Performance Measurement in
Malaysia 2014, 2014.
[17] C.M. Wallenburg, D.L. Cahill, TJ. Goldsby, and a. M. Knemeyer, Logistics outsourcing performance and
Loyalty behavior: Comparisons between Germany and the United States, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist.
Manag., vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 579–602, 2010.
[18] A. Study, 2015 Third-party Logistics Study The State of Logistics Outsourcing, 2015.
[19] A.K. Rahmat and N. Faisol, The quality of Outsourced Logistics Service in Collectivist Countries : A
Literature Review, 2010.
[20] S. Pathma, ―Logistics : Outsourcing logistics, The Edge Malaysia, 2018.
[21] Malaysia Investment Development Authority, ―Deepening the Logistics Supply Chain, MIDA Newsletter,
no. April, 2018.
[22] Economic Planning Unit Malaysia, Eleventh Malaysia Plan 2016-2020: Anchoring Growth on People.
Economic Planning Unit, Malaysia, 2015.
[23] MIDA, Logistics Sector: Generating Economic Growth, InvestByte, no. 5, pp. 1–9, 2014.
[24] M.A. Abu Bakar, H.S. Jaafar, N. Faisol, and A. Muhammad, Logistics Performance Measurements:
Issues and Reviews, in International Symposium on Logistics, 2012, no. 39944.
[25] M. Azlan, A. Bakar, and H. Suzana, Malaysian Logistics Performance : A Manufacturer's ’Perspective,
Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 224, no. August 2015, pp. 571–578, 2016.
[26] J. Harlina Suzana and R. Mohammed, Service Quality, Relationship Quality and Customer Loyalty in
Third Party Logistics: A Conceptual Model and Propositions, in Proceedings of the 33rd European
Marketing Academy Conference, University of Murcia, Spain, May 2004, p. 159 ISB? 84-8371-464-7,
2004, p. 159.
[27] A. Parasuraman, V.A. Zeithaml, and L.L. Berry, A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its
Implications for Future Research, J. Mark., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 41–50, 1985.
[28] Department of Statistics Malaysia, Economic Census 2016,‖ 2017.
[29] H.S. Jaafar and M. Rafiq, ―Logistics Service Quality and Commitment in Third Party Logistics,‖ Gading
Bus. Manag. J., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 65–79, 2005.
[30] R. V. Krejcie and D. W. Morgan, ―Determining Sample Size for Research,‖ Educal Psychol. Meas., vol. 38, pp. 607–610, 1970.
[31] L.D. Bacon, SPSS White Paper Using Amos for structural equation modeling in market research. 1997.
[32] B.G. Tabachnick and L. S. Fidell, Using Multivariate Statistics, Fourth Edi. 2001.
[33] F. Hashim, 2013 The Critical Review on Human Resource Competencies of Third Party Logistics (3PL) Companies by Service Users, no. December, pp. 454–462, 2013.
[34] A. Aguezzoul, ―The Third Party Logistics Selection: A review of literature, Omega, pp. 69–78, 2014.
[35] L. John and Capgemini, 2016 Third-Party Logistics Study: The State of Logistics Outsourcing, 2016.
[36] S.H. Chin, K.L. Soh, and W. P. Wong, ―Impact of Switching Costs on the Tripartite Model—Third Party Logistics,‖ vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 79–88, 2013.
[37] S.M. Azmin, A. Aziz, and M.A.R.A. Kader, Explaining Successful Implementation of Logistics Information Technology (LIT): An Empirical Study, Aust. J. Bus. Manag. Res., vol. 3, no. 8, p. 11, 2013.
[38] M.S. Sohail, A.S. Sohal, and R. Millen, The state of quality in logistics: evidence from an emerging Southeast Asian nation, Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 397–411, 2004.
[39] H. Jaafar and M. Rafiq, Logistics outsourcing practices in the UK: a survey, Int. J. Logist., vol. 8, no. 4.
pp. 299–312, Dec. 2005.
[40] M.S. Sohail and a. S. Sohal, The use of third-party logistics services: A Malaysian perspective,
Technovation, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 401–408, 2003.
[41] L. Hu and P.M. Bentler, Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Modeling : Sensitivity to Underparameterized
Model Misspecification, Psychol. Methods, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 424–453, 1998.
[42] R.C. Maccallum, M. W. Browne, and H. M. Sugawara, Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size
for Covariance Structure Modeling of fit involving a particular measure of model, Psychol. Methods, vol.
1, no. 2, pp. 130–149, 1996.
[43] A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry, Servequal: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring
Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality, J. Retail., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 12–40, 1988.
[44] S. Rahman and W. Selen, Shippers-Providers Perception of Third-Party Logistics Services: An
Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis, in Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on
Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Dhaka, Bangladesh, January 9–10, 2010.
[45] J.T. Mentzer, D.J. Flint, J.L. Kent, T. John, J. Daniel, and L. John, Developing a logistics service quality
scale, J. Bus. Logist., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 9, 1999.
[46] J. Harlina Suzana and M. Rafiq, ―Logistics Service Quality and Commitment in Third Party Logistics,‖ no. January, pp. 21–22, 2003.
[47] J.F. Arvis, D. Saslavsky, L. Ojala, B. Shepherd, C. Busch, A. Raj, and T. Naula, Connecting to Compete 2016: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators, 2016.
[48] C.C. Bienstock, J.T. Mentzer, and M. M. Bird, Measuring physical distribution service quality, J. Acad. Mark. Sci., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 31–44, Dec. 1997.
[49] D. Lambert and J.R. Stock, Strategic Logistics Management. Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA, 1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
