Challenges for the empowerment of young mental health service users in Norway
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/rc64mw26Keywords:
mental health service users, empowerment, lack of choice, power imbalance, consumerist approach.Abstract
Objective. The objective of this study was to explore how principles of empowerment are reflected in the experiences of young users of the mental health service in Norway and to determine challenges to their implementation.
Method. Thirty-two qualitative interviews were conducted with nine users during a 12-month period and analyzed to identify key themes related to their empowerment.
Results. Four themes were identified: the users’ wish to have control of their own illness and treatment; their trust in themselves and plans; at the same time, their self-devaluation and vulnerability; and a feeling of powerlessness because of the lack of choice and information within the Norwegian mental health service system.
Conclusion. The young mental health service users in our study had an adequate level of psychological empowerment. However, their empowerment as mental health patients was restricted by environmental factors, most of all the skewed power
distribution between users and health service professionals.
Downloads
References
Aujoulat, I., Luminet, O., & Deccache A. (2007). The Perspective of Patients on Their Experience of Powerlessness. Qualitative Health Research, 17 (6), 772-785.
Borg, M., & Kristiansen, K. (2004). Recovery oriented professionals: helping relationships in mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 13 (5), 493-505.
Crabtree, B., Miller,W. 1999. Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks. London. New Dehli. Sage Publications.
Damman, O., Spreeuwenberg, P., Rademakers, J., & Hendriks, M. (2011). Creating compact comparative health care information: what are the key quality attributes to present for cataract and total hip or knee replacement surgery? Medical Decision Making, 32, 287-300.
Deci, E., Ryan, L., & Richard, M. (2008). Self-determination theory: a macro theory of human motivation, development and health. Canadian Psychology, 49 (3), 182-185.
Diseth, R., & Høglend, P. (2014). Compulsory mental health care in Norway: treatment criteria. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37 (2), 168-173.
Elstad,T., & Kristiansen, K., (2009). Mental health centres as ‘meeting-places’ in the community: exploring experience of being service users and participants. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 11 (3), 195-208.
Grundy, A., Bee, P., Meade, O., Callagan, P., Beatty, S., Olleveant, N., & Lovell, K. 2016. Bringing meaning to user involvement to mental health care planning: a qualitative exploration of service user perspective. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 23 (1), 12-21.
Fitzsimons, S., & Fuller, R. (2002). Empowerment and its implications for clinical practice in mental health: a review. Journal of Mental Health, 101(5), 481-499.
Hansen, T., Hatling, T., Lidal, E., & Ruud, T. (2004). The user perspective: respected or rejected in mental health care? Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 11 (3), 292-297.
Hansen, G. (2007). Samarbeid uten felleskap: om individuelle planer i kommunalt psykisk helse arbeid. Doctoral Thesis.
Karlstad Universitet. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:6531/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Assessed: 29.09.2015.
Happell, B., Manias, E., & Roper, C. (2004). Wanting to be heard: mental health consumers’ experiences of information about medication. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 13 (4), 242-248.
Hickey, G., & Kipping, C. (1998). Exploring the concept of user involvement in mental health through a participation continuum. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 7, 83-88.
Holum, L. (2012). “Individual plan” in a user-oriented and empowering perspective: A qualitative study of “individual plans” in Norwegian mental health services. Nordic Psychology, 64 (1), 44-57.
Kumar, S. (2000). Client empowerment in psychiatry and the professional abuse of clients: Where do we stand? International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 30, 61 – 70.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Interviewing. London: Sage. Link, B., Struening, E., Neese-Todd, S., Asmussen, S., & Phelan J. (2001). Stigma as a barrier to recovery: the consequences of stigma for the self-esteem of people with mental illnesses. Psychiatric Services, 52 (12, 1621-1626.
Lord, J., & Dufort, F. (1996). Power and oppression in mental health. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 15, 1185.
Masterson, S., & Owen, S. (2009). Mental health service user's social and individual empowerment: using theories of power toelucidate far-reaching strategies. Journal of Mental Health, 15 (1), 19-34.
Nygårdh, A., Malm, D., Wikby, K., & Ahlstrom, G. (2012). The experience of empowerment in the patient-staff encounter: the patient’s perspective. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21 (5-6), 897-904.
Newman, D., O'Reilly, P., Lee, S., & Kennedy, C. (2015). Mental health service users' experiences of mental health care: an integrative literature review. Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 22 (3), 171-182.
Nordgren, S., & Fridlund, B. (2001). Patients' perceptions of self-determination as expressed in the context of care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 35 (1), 117-125.
Oades, L. , & Deane, F. , 2007. The framework for Psychosocial Rehabilitation: Bringing it into focus. In R. King, C. Lloyd, & T. Meehan (Eds.) Handbook of psychosocial rehabilitation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Ramsdal, H., Hansen, G., Hengesen, M & Feiring M. (2008). The social and cognitive mapping of policy. Actors, organization and knowledge. Project n.02888482 co-funded by the European Commission Within the Sixth Framework
Program, assessed 09.06.2017,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255596595_The_social_and_cognitive_mapping_of_policy
Rappaport, J. (1984). Studies in empowerment: introduction to the issue, in: J. Rappaport, R. Hess (eds.) Studies in Empowerment: Steps toward Understanding and Action, 1-9. New York: Routledge.
Rise, M., Solbjør, M., Lara, M., Westerlund, H., Grimstad, H., & Steinsbekk, A. (2011).Same description, different values.
How service users and providers define patient and public involvement in health care. Health Expectations, 16, 266-276.
Rogers, C. (2012). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist view of Psychotherapy. Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Ross, C., & Goldner, E. (2009). Stigma, negative attitudes and discrimination towards mental illness within the nursing profession: a review of the literature. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 16 (6), 558-567.
Schon, U.K., & Rosenberg, D. (2013). Transplanting recovery: research and practice in the Nordic countries. Journal of Mental Health, 22 (6), 563-569.
Solbjør M., Rise, M. & Westerlund H. (2011). Patient participation in mental health care: when it is difficult? A qualitative study of users and providers in a mental health hospital in Norway. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 59 (13).
Storm, M., & Davidson, L. (2010). Inpatients' and providers' experiences with user involvement in patient care. Psychiatric Quarterly 81 (2), 111-125.
Storgaard I., & Askheim O. (2014). Empowerment and personal assistance: resistance, consumer choice, partnership or discipline. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 16, 62-78.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
