Comparison of Levels and Types of Aggressive Behaviours among Students of Islamic Secondary Schools in Terengganu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/mez89w75Keywords:
Aggressive Behaviour, Islamic Secondary School, StudentsAbstract
The increase in levels of aggressive behaviour involving bullying, hitting, and injuring others amongst students has reached the level of concern in today’s society. This study aimed to measure the level of students’ aggressive behaviour involving four types of aggression: physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger aggression, and hostility aggression. The data used to measure these types of aggression was gathered by the Aggression Questionnaire by Buss & Perry (1992). This study was focused on students (n = 200) of several Islamic secondary schools in Terengganu. The methodology of this study was using quantitative studies by distributing questionnaires and analysing them using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 23.0. The findings of this study showed that the levels of physical aggression (2.4467), verbal aggression (2.9071), anger aggression (2.6571), and hostility aggression (3.1736) were at a moderate level. The findings of this study also found that there was no significant difference between physical aggression and verbal aggression based on gender, but there was a significant difference between anger aggression and hostility aggression among female and male students of Islamic secondary schools. Therefore, it is recommended that aggressive behaviour of students of Islamic secondary schools be taken into consideration by educational institutions as well as those who plan intervention programs for students.
Downloads
References
[1] Wann, D.L., Haynes, G., McLean, B., & Pullen P. Sport team identification and willingness to consider an anonymous act of hostile aggression. Aggress Behav. 29:406-413.
[2] Olweus D. Bullying at School: Long-term outcomes for the victims and an effective school-based intervention program. Teoksessa. 1993. 315–341 p.
[3] Husman, B.F., & Silva, JM. Aggression in Sport: Definitional and Theoretical Conderation. In J.M. Silva & R.S. Weinberg (Eds.),. Psychol Found Sport Champaign, Hum Kinet (pp. 246-260).
[4] Parens H. Aggression in our children. Northvale, NJ: Jason. Aronson. 1987.
[5] Noruzzaman AR. Perbandingan Tahap Tingkah Laku Agresif Antara Atlet dan Bukan Atlet Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Daerah Hilir Perak, Malaysia. Universiti Putra Malaysia. 2010.
[6] Buss AH, Perry M. The Aggression Questionnaire. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992;63(3):452–9.
[7] Kementerian Pendidikan. Laporan Khas Sabtu. 2016;22.
[8] Yahaya AH, Shahrin Y, Sharif HM, Zurhana M, Muhamad B. Indeks Perlakuan Buli Di Kalangan Pelajar Di Sekolah Menengah Dan Rendah Di Malaysia (Bully Action Index Among Students in Secondary
and Primary School in Malaysia). 2008.
[9] Husni MA. Efektivitas Pelatihan Empati Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Sosial Pada Bystander Dalam
Peristiwa Bullying di SMP “X” Yogyakarta. Universitas Islam Indonesia; 2018.
[10] Yahaya A. Gejala Buli Di Kalangan Pelajar- Pelajar - pelajar Sekolah Kajian-Kajian Buli. 2015;
[11] Ahmad A. Kesan Intervensi Psiko-Pendidikan Terhadap Tingkah Laku Murid Sekolah Menengah Oleh
Guru Bimbingan dan Kaunseling. Universiti Malaya; 2013.
[12] Rozaliza Abdul Manap. Pemahaman Guru Pendidikan Islam Mengenai Perlakuan Buli dalam Kalangan
Pelajar Sekolah Menengah di Daerah Kerian Perak. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris; 2015.
[13] May LM. Pengesanan Tingkah Laku Agresif Berasaskan Poligraf Dalam Kalangan Penghuni-Penghuni
Beresiliensi Rendah di Sekolah Tunas Bakti. Universiti Sains Malaysia. 2015.
[14] Hussin Z. Faktor Risiko Tingkah Laku Agresif: Simbol Pemberontakan Jiwa Mat. 2017; (December).
[15] Yahaya A, Boon Y, Ramli J, Hashim S, Idris F. Persepsi Pelakuan Agresif dan Faktor yang Mempengaruhi
di Lima Buah Sekolah di Kawasan Bandar Johor Bahru. J Teknol (Social Sci. 2010; 53:75–94.
[16] Yahaya A., Idris F. Tingkah Laku Agresif. In 2011.
[17] Hsieh IJ, Chen YY. Determinants of aggressive behavior: Interactive effects of emotional regulation and
inhibitory control. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):1-9.
[18] Kruti I, Melonashi E. Aggression Among Albanian Adolescents. Int J Acad Res Reflect [Internet].
2015;3(6):16–24.
[19] Alias S. Satu Kajian Tentang Tingkah Laku Agresif di Kalangan Pelajar Universiti Malaysia Sarawak.
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak; 2006.
[20] Yahya A, Maakip I, and Voo P. Pengaruh Media Berunsur Agresif dan Kesannya Terhadap Tingkah Laku
Pelajar Sekolah Menengah. In 2018.
[21] Raji NAA, Mansor N, M.K. A-F, Mansor S, Raji NHA. The Use of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT)
in Smoking Cessation: A Case Study. 2019;7(2):11–5.
[22] Ali NHM, Elias N. Menggunakan Pendekatan Kognitif Tingkah Laku Islam (ICBT) Untuk Menangani
Prasangka Antara Pasangan Suami Isteri. Malaysian J Soc Sci Humanit. 2016;1(3):124–31.
[23] Abdullah CH. Intervensi Modul Bimbingan Islam Terhadap Masalah Kecelaruan Kebimbangan Umum
dalam Kalangan Pelajar Universiti: Satu Kajian Kes [Internet]. Universiti Sains Malaysia. 2014.
[24] Zahir MZ, Saper N, Bistamam MN. Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Modul Kelompok Bimbingan Integrasi
REBT-Tazkiyah An-Nafs. J Res Policy Pract Teach Teach Educ. 2019;9(1):58–69.
[25] Sulaiman WABW. Keberkesanan modul intervensi terapi kognitif dan terapi tingkah laku dalam kaunseling
kelompok menangani tekanan terhadap jururawat. Bangi, Selangor : Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia;
2016.
[26] Lonchman JE. Cognitive-behavioral intervention with aggressive boys. three-year follow-up and preventive effects. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992;60(3):426–32.
[27] Kastner J. w. clial change in adolescent aggressive behaviour: A Group Therapy Approach. Journal of Child & Adolescent Group Therapy. 1998;8:22–33.
[28] Ayub N, Nasir R, Mohamad MS, Kadir NBA. Keberkesanan Kaunseling Kelompok Tingkah Laku Kognitif Terhadap Kemarahan dan Agresif Dalam Kalangan Banduan Penjara Lelaki. J Psikol Malaysia. 2016;30(1):40–51.
[29] Chin LS. Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Anger Management Module On Anger Expressions Among Adolescents. Universiti Sains Malaysia; 2016.
[30] Chua YP. Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: kaedah penyelidikan. McgrawHill Education. 2011.
[31] Palaniappan. AK. SPSS untuk penyelidikan. In: Scholar Press Selangor. 2007.
[32] Sekaran. Research Methods for Business: In: A skill-building approach. Singapore: John Willey & Sons, 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
