Factors Influencing the Evaluation Process of Teacher Professional Allowance Policy

Authors

  • Jeane Tuilan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Author
  • Basikin Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/q53az853

Keywords:

Factors, Evaluation, Allowances, Teacher, Professional, Policy

Abstract

The main problem in this study is the performance allowance of the teacher. The purpose of this research is to find out the factors influencing the evaluation process of teacher professional allowance policy (a study at SMP Negeri 2 Tomohon). This research is expected: (1). To be able to develop concepts of public policy theory, especially regarding Teacher Professional Allowance Evaluation Policy in Tokyo City (2). To be able to increase knowledge about public policy concepts and evaluation, especially being critical in responding to various public problems that occur around us. The researchers took SMP Negeri 2 Tomohon as the research location and used qualitative research, which was conducted in a natural setting, and the data collected was generally qualitative. The results were several factors: (1). The effectiveness that when the teacher has status as a professional, of course, he should also have to work professionally by adjusting with developments, both in terms of ability in the preparation of the material and the mastery of technology as well; (2). Efficiency: this professional allowance is a policy step taken by the government to improve academic qualifications and competencies and to increase the level of welfare of teachers. This study recommends further research on teacher professional competence in Tokyo City. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Abidin, Zainal. (2005). Kebijakan Publik (Edisi Revisi Cetakan Ketiga). Jakarta: Suara Bebas

[2] Mujtahid. (2011). Pengembangan Profesi Guru. Malang: UIN-Maliki Press.

[3] Munandar, S.C.U. (2009). Pengembangankreativitasanakberbakat. Jakarta: PT Rineka Ciptadan Dep.

Pendidikandan Kebudayaan

[4] Munandar, S.C.U. (1985). Mengembangkan Bakatdan Kreativitas Anak Sekolah. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

[5] Nurdin, Syafruddin. (2003). Guru Profesionaldan Implementasi Kurikulum. Jakarta: Ciputat Press.

[6] Pasolong, Harbani. (2010). Teori Administrasi Publik. Bandung: Alfabeta.

[7] Pasolong, Harbani. (2013). Metode Penelitian Administrasi Publik. Bandung: Alfabeta.

[8] Saud. (2008). Pengembangan Profesi Guru. Bandung: Alfabeta

[9] Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

[10] Syafiie, K, Inu. (1997). Ilmu Administrasi Publik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

[11] ……………… (2012). Profesionalisme Guru.

[12] Tangkau, Charles. (2011). Modul Metodologi Penelitian. Tondano: Universitas Negeri Manado.

[13] Wahab, Solichin. (1991). Analisis Kebijaksanaan, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

[14] Wicaksono, Kristian.(2014). Telaah Kritis Admnistrasi & Manajemen Sektor Publik di Indonesia. Bandung: Gava Media.

[15] Yamin, Martinis.(2013). Sertifikasi Profesi Keguruan di Indonesia. Jambi: Gaung Persada

[16] Basikin, Watt, Ricardson. 2007. “Beginning Teachers’ Motivations and Aspirations through Teacher Education”. Arizona: EAC 2007 Poster.

[17] Law No. 14 of 2005 Concerning Teachers and Lecturers.

[18] Law No. 20 of 2003 Concerning National Education System.

[19] Government Regulation No. 19 of 2005 Concerning the implementation of Law No. 20 of 2003.

[20] Government Regulation No. 74 of 2008 Concerning Teachers, which contains provisions concerning the professionalization of teachers.

[21] Directorate General of Teachers and Education Educator of North Sulawesi Province.

[22] Minahasa Regency Recipient of Junior High School Level Professional Profession Allowances in 2017.

Downloads

Published

30.04.2020

How to Cite

Tuilan, J., & Basikin. (2020). Factors Influencing the Evaluation Process of Teacher Professional Allowance Policy. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), 2312-2321. https://doi.org/10.61841/q53az853