Public Facilities Preference of Youth Residents in Low-cost Housing Flats towards Sustainable Living

Authors

  • Alice Sabrina Ismail Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Author
  • Nor Shahida Azili Senior Lecturer, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Author
  • Fadhlina Ahmad @ Taufik Senior Lecturer, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Author
  • Ezlina Mohamad Esa Post Graduate Student, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Author
  • Ahmad Azim Ashar Post Graduate Student, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/hr5v0320

Keywords:

Public Facilities, Low - cost Housing Flats, Youth Preference, Sustainable Living

Abstract

Public facilities are an important component that guarantees the country’s growth and human development. Nonetheless, public facilities located in residential areas play an essential role in providing support services to create a viable and sustainable living for cohesive communities. Past studies on public facilities, however, have much focused on accessibility, provisioning, and service requirements. So far, there has been no literature that addresses the aspects of preparing and managing public facilities for the benefit of youth residents in low-cost housing flats. The objective of this study, therefore, is to obtain the perception of youth residents in two low-cost housing flats located in the urban areas of Kuala Lumpur and Johor Bahru city. This is vital to obtain youth resident satisfaction in terms of maintenance effectiveness on the provided public facilities. To conduct this study, qualitative and quantitative methods involving the perception of youth residents on two selected case studies were done to establish appropriate public facility design attributes. Findings indicate that proper preparation and management of public facilities may contribute to the development of positive psychological behavior among youths in terms of promoting the value of responsibilities (obligation) and respect (gratitude). The findings are of benefits for future designers, builders, developers, and related authorities to improve the preparation and management of public facilities in low-cost housing sectors. This is important to enhance the quality of public facilities for the youths in low-cost housing towards better satisfaction for fostering sustainable living. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Abdul-Aziz, A.-R., & Kasim, P. J. (2011). Objectives, Success and Failure Factors Of Housing Public

Private Partnerships in Malaysia. Habitat International, 35(1), 150-157.

[2] Abdullahi, B. C. & Aziz, W. N. A. W. A. (2017). Pragmatic Housing Policy In The Quest For Low-Income

Group Housing Delivery in Malaysia. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 8(1), 1-18

[3] Besar, J. A., Ali, M., WC, V. Y., Lyndon, N., & Ali, M. N. S. (2018). Impak Sosioekonomi Dan Politik

Program Perumahan Rakyat LembahSubang, Selangor (The Socio-Economic and Political Impact of

Peoples’ Housing ProgrammeIn in Lembah Subang, Selangor. Akademika, 88(1), 1-12

[4] Carruthers, J. I., & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2003). Urban sprawl and the cost of public services. Environment and

Planning B. Planning and Design, 30(4), 503-522.

[5] Goh, A. T. & Yahaya, A. (2011). Public Low-Cost Housing in Malaysia: Case Studies on PPR Low-Cost

Flats in Kuala Lumpur. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 8(1), 1-18.

[6] Ismail, A. S., Mohidin, H. H. B., & Daud, M. M. (2017). A Review of Occupants Satisfaction and Wellness

Level of low-cost housing in Malaysia. Planning Malaysia Journal, 15(3), 147-158

[7] Jusoh, H. & Ahmad, H. (2009). Keefisienan Perkhidmatan Pihak Berkuasa Tempatan Di Wilayah

Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur: Perspektif Komuniti. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 5(1),

54-68.

[8] Karim, H. A. (2012). Low-cost housing environment: compromising quality of life? Procedia-Social and

Behavioral Sciences, 35, 44-53.

[9] Kumarasamy, I. (2015). Tugas-tugas Utama Pengurusan Harta Pihak Berkuasa Tempatan. Universiti

Teknologi Malaysia.

[10] Malek, N. M. & Husin, A. (2012). Pemilikan Rumah Dalam Kalangan Masyarakat Bandar Berpendapatan

Sederhana Dan Rendah Di Malaysia. Sosiohumanika, 5(2), 269-284

[11] Mohit, M. A., Ibrahim, M., & Rashid, Y. R. (2010). Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed

public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat International, 34(1), 18-27.

[12] Nientied, P., Mhenni, S. B., & de Wit, J. (1990). Community participation in low-income housing policies:

potential or paradox. Community Development Journal, 25(1), 42-55.

[13] Nizam Kamaruzzaman, S. & Marinie Ahmad Zawawi, E. (2010). Development of facilities management in

Malaysia. Journal of Facilities Management, 8(1), 75-81.

[14] Omar, D. B. (2009). Communal living environment in low-cost housing development in Malaysia. Asian

Social Science, 4(10), 98–105.

[15] PPRM (2018) Persatuan Pusat Aduan Rakyat Malaysia E-Report retrieved on 1/6/2019 from

http://par.org.my/v2/

[16] Rose, R. A. H. C., Nor, A. R. M., Ahmad, A., Buang, A., & Zainol, R. M. (2017). Pemantauan Keberkesanan

Pembangunan Wilayah Malaysia Dalam Aspek Penduduk Tempatan Di Iskandar Malaysia (The social

impact of Iskandar Malaysia regional development on the local population—an overview). Geografia Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 7(5), 40-54.

[17] Salleh, A. G. (2008). Neighbourhood factors in private low-cost housing in Malaysia. Habitat International,

32(4), 485-493.

[18] Stivens, M. (2012). The Youth, Modernity, and Morality in Malaysia. Questioning modernity in Indonesia

and Malaysia, 169-200.

[19] Tan, T.-H. (2012). Meeting first-time buyers’ housing needs and preferences in greater Kuala Lumpur.

Cities, 29(6), 389-396.

[20] Teo, P. & Huang, S. (1996). A Sense of Place in Public Housing: A Case Study of Pasir Ris, Singapore.

Habitat International, 20(2), 307-325.

[21] Thomson, R., & Holland, J. (2004). Youth values and transitions to adulthood: An empirical investigation.

Families & Social Capital ESRC Research Group.

[22] Zaid, N. & Graham, P. (2011). Low-cost housing in Malaysia: A contribution to sustainable development.

Proc., Energy, Environment, and Sustainability, 82-87.

Downloads

Published

30.04.2020

How to Cite

Sabrina Ismail, A., Shahida Azili, N., Ahmad @ Taufik, F., Mohamad Esa, E., & Azim Ashar, A. (2020). Public Facilities Preference of Youth Residents in Low-cost Housing Flats towards Sustainable Living. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), 1950-1971. https://doi.org/10.61841/hr5v0320