Family-friendly Neighborhood in the Malaysian Perspective: A Review of Literature

Authors

  • Siti Fatimah Hashim Student of Doctoral Program, Center of Postgraduate Studies, Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia Author
  • Raja Norashekin Raja Othman Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor Branch, Puncak Alam, Malaysia Author
  • Habsah Hashim Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor Branch, Puncak Alam, Malaysia. Responsive Environmental Development Research Group, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. Author
  • Na’asah Nasrudin Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor Branch, Puncak Alam, Malaysia. Responsive Environmental Development Research Group, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/y1h33g65

Keywords:

Family-friendly Indicators, Urban Neighborhood, Quality of Life

Abstract

The increasing number of dual-earner families nowadays to cope with the higher cost and standard of urban living has resulted in several issues concerning communities in the urban neighborhoods. Families need care services for their children and dependents, which range from hiring a full-time maid to sending children to nearby babysitters or faraway care centers. Due to the lack of public facilities and other reasons like seeking quality care, many families opted for private care services. Although the family-friendly cities initiative has been incorporated in the planning profession, there are limited studies discussing the family-friendly neighborhood indicators, especially in Malaysia. Therefore, this paper aims to look at this issue through a review of the literature. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was adopted for the review of therecent research articles/papers. It was performed in two main journal databases: via (i) Web of Science (WoS) and (ii) Scopus to retrieve high-impact journal articles. The results of the study showed that a number of recommendations were presented for the reference of future scholars in the 31 selected articles after going through the process of identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion. This study is significant because making neighborhoods family-friendly could improve the quality of life for communities in urban areas. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] United Nations. Report of the World Summit for Social Development: 6-12 March 1995 [Internet]. 1995.

[2] Federal Department of Town and Country Planning. National Urbanisation Policy. Jabatan Perancangan

Bandar dan Desa; 2006.

[3] Habsah Hashim. Urbanization, women’s roles, and fertility trends. A Case Study of Middle Class Malay

Women in Shah Alam. Universiti of Malaya; 2010.

[4] Bronfenbrenner, U. Making Human Beings Human: Bioecological Perspectives on Human Development.

Thousand Oaks, United States: SAGE Publications (CA); 2004. 336 p.

[5] Madan GR. Sociology of Development (PB). First Edit. New Delhi, Mumbai, India: Sunil Sachdev; 2002.

526 p.

[6] Etzioni A. The Spirit of Community: Right, Responsibilities, and the Communitarian Agenda. New York:

Crown Publishers, Inc.; 1993. 315 p.

[7] Narayanan SL, Savarimuthu A. Work-Family Conflict, Family-Work Conflict as Predictors of Work-Life

Balance among Women Employees Working in IT Industries. Int Conf Technol Bus Manag. 2015;635–9.

[8] Leineweber C, Baltzer M, Magnusson Hanson LL, Westerlund H. Work-Family Conflict and Health in

Swedish Working Women and Men: A 2-year Prospective Analysis (The SLOSH Study). Eur J Public

Health. 2013 Aug;23(4):710–6.

[9] Griggs TL, Casper WJ, and Eby LT. Work, Family and Community Support as Predictors of Work-Family

Conflict: A Study of Low-Income Workers. J Vocat Behav. 2013 Feb;82(1):59–68.

[10] Ferguson M, Carlson D, Zivnuska S, Whitten D. Support at Work and Home: The Path to Satisfaction

Through Balance. J Vocat Behav. 2012 Apr;80(2):299–307.

[11] Ahmad A. Job, family, and individual factors as predictors of work-family conflict. J Hum Resour Adult

Learn. 2008;4(1):57–65.

[12] Siddaway AP, Wood AM, Hedges L V. How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for

Conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-synthesises. 2018.

[13] Shaffril HAM, Samah AA, Samsuddin SF, Ali Z. Mirror-mirror on The Wall: What Climate Change

Adaptation Strategies are Practiced by the Asian’s Fishermen of All? J Clean Prod. 2019, 20;232:104–17.

[14] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Guidelines and Guidance Preferred Reporting Items for

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Med [Internet]. 2009;6(7).

[15] Gür M. Inversion of Urban Transformation Approach in Turkey into Family-Friendly Transformation. J

Hous Built Environment. 2019 Sep 15;

[16] Silverman RM, Taylor HL, Yin L, Miller C, Buggs P. There Goes Our Family Friendly Neighborhood:

Residents’ Perceptions of Institutionally Driven Inner-City Revitalization in Buffalo, NY. J Community

Pract. 2019 Apr 3;27(2):168–87.

[17] Mildred EW, Rukus J. Planning for Family-Friendly Communities: Motivators, Barriers and Benefits

[Internet]. 2013.

[18] Rukus J., Warner ME. Crime Rates and Collective Efficacy: The Role of Family Friendly Planning. Cities.

2013 Apr;31:37–46.

[19] Provi Drianda R. Exploring the Notion of the Family-Friendly City. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and

Environmental Science. Institute of Physics Publishing; 2018. p. 1–10.

[20] Lehning AJ, Smith RJ, Kim K. “Friendly” Initiatives: An Emerging Approach to Improve Communities for

Vulnerable Populations. J Policy Pract. 2017 Jan 2;16(1):46–58.

[21] Osborne C, Baldwin C, Thomsen D, Woolcock G. The Unheard Voices of Youth in Urban Planning

Social Capital as a Theoretical Lens in Sunshine Coast, Australia. Child Geogr. 2017 May 4;15(3):349–61.

[22] Pew Research Center. Raising Kids and Running a Household: How Working Parents Share the Load

[Internet]. 2015.

[23] Clark AL. Home Economics: Reimagining How the Home Can Support Single-Mother Families. TUFTS

University; 2018.

[24] Boelsma F, Schippers A, Dane M, Abma TA. “Special” Families and Their “Normal” Daily Lives: Family Quality of Life and the Social Environment. Int J Child, Youth Fam Stud. 2018;9(4):107–24.

[25] Bookman A. Starting in Our Own Backyards: How Working Families Can Build Community and Survive the New Economy. New York and London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2004. 288 p.

[26] Voydanoff P. Work, Family, and Community: Exploring Interconnections. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. New York and Hove: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2013. 191 p.

Downloads

Published

30.04.2020

How to Cite

Fatimah Hashim, S., Norashekin Raja Othman, R., Hashim, H., & Nasrudin, N. (2020). Family-friendly Neighborhood in the Malaysian Perspective: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), 1906-1915. https://doi.org/10.61841/y1h33g65