Evaluation of Programs Medical Laboratory Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/9hng6a13Keywords:
Evaluation Program, Medical Laboratory Technology, Context Input Process ProductsAbstract
This study aims to determine and describe the implementation of the Acceleration Program for Improving the Qualification of the Diploma in Three Medical Laboratory Technology through Recognition of Past Learning towards improvement and refinement. This research is a program evaluation using an evaluative method based on the context input process and product evaluation model, which focuses on just one phenomenon selected and wants to be understood in depth by ignoring other phenomena. Respondents are managers of the Medical Laboratory Technology D-III Program, lecturers, students, and graduate user agencies. Data collection techniques in this study are adjusted to the data components sought by using interview techniques, questionnaires, and an inventory checklist. The evaluation of this study is the evaluation of lectures, which begins with the learning planning process, the implementation of learning, assessment of learning outcomes, and supervision of learning (Monev) in the Medical Laboratory Technology D-III Program. The results of the evaluation are expected to help the project leader or teacher make decisions regarding the continuation, end, or modification of the program. Product evaluation is related to the results of a program. This evaluation is a record of the achievement of results and decisions for improvement, implementation, or actualization. Evaluation activities are efforts to measure and interpret the results achieved. Measurements are developed and administered carefully and thoroughly. The accuracy of the analysis will be the material for drawing conclusions and submitting suggestions to what extent the product can be reached by the eligibility standards.
Downloads
References
[1] Mitchell J. How Information-Based Planning Can Flourish Where Traditional Politics Reign: An Example from Pakistan (January), 1–2. J Educ Int Dev. 2008;1–2.
[2] PPSDMK Kemenkes RI. Technical Guidelines for the Implementation of the Health Workforce Acceleration Program. Jakarta: Kemenkes RI; 2017.
[3] Hardre PL, Slater J, and Nanny M. Redesigning and Aligning Assessment Journal of Evaluation For a Federally Funded Math and Science Teacher Educational Program. J Evaluation Progr Plain. 2010;33(4):508.
[4] Atjonen P. Your career will be over, power, and contradictions in the work of educational evaluators. J Stud Educ Eval., 2015;5(37):39–55.
[5] Isaac S., Michael WB. Handbook of Research and Evaluation. In San Diego: Edits Publisher; 1983.
[6] Jacobs AHM., Institutional Culture And Recognition Of Prior Learning. South African J High Educ [Internet]. 2018; 32(4): 96–109.
[7] Singh AM. Let the doors of learning be open to all. A case Recognit prior Learn. 2011;25(4):803–18.
[8] Pokorny H, Fox S, Griffiths D. Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) as pedagogical pragmatism. Widening Particip Lifelong Learn., 2017;19(3):18–31.
[9] Miguel MC, Ornelas JH, Maroco JP. Recognition of prior learning: the participants' perspective. Miguel, M. C., Ornelas, J. H., and Maroco, J. P. (2016). 2016;38(2):179–94.
[10] Graaf F. De. The interpretation of a knowledge claim in the Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) and the impact of this on RPL practice. Stud Contin Educ., 2014;36(1):1–14.
[11] Sandberg F. A Habermasian Analysis of a Process of Recognition Health Care Assistants. Adult Educ Q. 2012; 4: 351–70.
[12] Warju. Educational Program Evaluation using CIPP Model. Innov Vocat Technol Educ [Internet]. 2016;12(1):36–42.
[13] Akpur U, Alcı B, Karataş H. Evaluation of the curriculum of English preparatory classes at Yildiz Technical University using the CIPP model. Educ Res Rev [Internet]. 2016;11(7):466–73.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
