Role of Contract Farming in Increasing Agricultural Sustainability in India: A Quantitative Investigation

Authors

  • RAJNEESH BHARDWAJ Assistant Professor, Department of Agriculture, Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun Uttarakhand India 248002 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/4svx6h73

Keywords:

Contract farming, farmers, agriculture, sustainability, economic stability, production hazard

Abstract

 A rise in the popularity of processed goods, changes in consumer behaviour, and supportive regulatory environments, farm centred on a partnership among peasants as well as agroprocessing and/or marketing corporations is becoming more popular in Indian farming. The rationale for the development of such a type of farming is to boost individual financing of the industry while lowering pricing hazards and post-harvest damages, particularly for commodities like largely priced fruit, greens, and high-risk vegetables. Small holdings might receive a wide range of assistance from the private industry, including input supply, product assembling, and sales. Considering this, the current research looks into the degree to which contract farming will free local farmers in Indian agriculture from their current burdens and aid their escape from the cycle of scarcity. It was noted that although contract farming does have the ability to tackle issues with access to markets (both input and output), modern tech, and economic stability, it additionally has the possibility of worsening issues with traditional knowledge deterioration, soil conditions, and prejudice against big farms. Stronger organizational structure is deemed necessary to increase the sustainability and inclusivity of farming activities. The sample size of the study was 183 respondents. The data analysis was performed with the help of t-test and mean. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Singh, S. (2002). Contracting out solutions: Political economy of contract farming in

the Indian Punjab. World development, 30(9), 1621-1638.

2. Swain, B. B. (2016). Contract farming and Indian agriculture: Can agribusiness help?

the small farmer? Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(3), 285-297.

3. Birthal, P. S. (2008). Making contract farming work in smallholder agriculture. New

Delhi: National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, pp. 1-16

4. Gulati, A., et al. (2008). Toward contract farming in a changing agrifood system.

Contract Farming in India: A Resource Book. Indian Council of Agricultural Research,

Pp 1-16

5. Kumar, P. (2006). Contract farming through agribusiness firms and state corporations:

A case study in Punjab: Economic and Political Weekly, Pp 5367-5375.

6. Huh, W. T. & Lall, U. (2013). Optimal crop choice, irrigation allocation, and the

impact of contract farming. Production and Operations Management, Vol. 22(5), Pp

1126-1143.

7. Minot, N., & Sawyer, B. (2016). Contract farming in developing countries: Theory,

practice, and policy implications. Innovation for inclusive value chain development:

Successes and challenges, Pp. 127-155

8. Mahendra Dev, S. (2014). Small farmers in India: Challenges and opportunities, Pp. 1

35

9. Narayanan, S. (2014). Profits from participation in high-value agriculture: Evidence of

heterogeneous benefits in contract farming schemes in Southern India. Food Policy, 44,

142-157.

10. Vicol, M. (2017). Is contract farming an inclusive alternative to land grabbing? The

case of potato contract farming in Maharashtra, India. Geoforum, 85, 157-166.

11. Mishra, A. K., et al. (2018). How can organic rice be a boon to smallholders? Evidence

from contract farming in India. Food Policy, 75, 147-157.

12. Sarkar, S. (2014). Contract farming and McKinsey’s plan for transforming agriculture

into agribusiness in West Bengal. Journal of South Asian Development, 9(3), 235-251.

Downloads

Published

18.09.2024

How to Cite

BHARDWAJ, R. (2024). Role of Contract Farming in Increasing Agricultural Sustainability in India: A Quantitative Investigation. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(1), 1212-1220. https://doi.org/10.61841/4svx6h73