Theatre for Social Transformation in Japanese, Chinese and Korean
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/2w6pgh17Keywords:
Social Transformation, Asian Cultures, Traditions.Abstract
In the pre-modern world, theatre was a vibrant and massive presence. In the seventeenth century, Chinese scientist Li Liweng states, "The historical context of a ritual is determined by the performances it conveyed. As a result, while unique in some ways, playwriting is clearly not a minor skill. It ranks towards the top of the list, with history, diary, section, and stating "(78-79). In today's society, such a predicament for the presentation community has been tested and problematized. Today's execution scholars, like Philip Auslander, criticise the "standard, unreflective guesses" made about live executions. "Attempts to explain the value of liveness' [by] conjuring sayings and disarrays like 'the witchcraft of live theatre,' the 'energy' that presumably exists among performers and events in a live event, and the 'neighbourhood' live show is occasionally said to make among performers, moreover, eyewitnesses," says Auslander. Innovation has turned the world, and people themselves, into a'standing store' where anything and everyone is instrumental, a method for being spent or obliterated, rather than a completely present end in themselves, thanks to imaginative advancements in PC-based recreation and correspondences (Heidegger 3-35). Overall, postmodern speculation will consider theatre as a "fascinating and mistaken development in relation to a connected world" and will question if the live scene still exists (Fortier 220). This study is also concerned with theater's Leftist philosophy and its opposition to fundamentalist dramatic development. Farming, proficiency crusade, social concordance, young lady dealing, youngster labour, orientation separation, strict resistance, ladies strengthening, HIV-AIDS prevention, family planning, beat polio, sustenance, climate contamination, and so on are all issues that theatre in India emphasizes.
Downloads
References
Alexander, J.C., D. Palmer, S. Park, and A. Ku, eds. 2019. The civil sphere in East Asia.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Chan, C. 2012a. Marketing death: Culture and the making of a life insurance market in
China. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Chan, C. 2012b. Culture, state, and varieties of capitalism: A comparative study of life
insurance markets in Hong Kong and Taiwan. British Journal of Sociology. 63 (1): 97–
122.
• Chan, C. 2013. Doing ideology amid a crisis: Collective actions and discourses of the
Chinese falun gong movement. Social Psychology Quarterly 76 (1): 1–24.
• Goossaert, V., and D. Palmer. 2011. The religious question in modern China. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
• Grindstaff, L., M. Lo, and J.R. Hall, eds. 2010. Handbook of Cultural Sociology, 1st ed.
New York: Routledge.
• Grindstaff, L., M. Lo, and J.R. Hall, eds. 2019. Routledge handbook of cultural
sociology, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
• Hsiau, A. 2000. Contemporary Taiwanese cultural nationalism. London: Routledge.
• Hsiau, A. 2008. Huigui xianshi: Taiwan yijiuqiling de zhanhou shidai yu wenhua
zhengzhi bianqian (Returning to Reality: The postwar generation and cultural-Political
changes in the 1970s). Taipei: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica.
• Jeong, T. 2018. The 87 regime and ideology-value changes in civil society: Candlelight
revolution and the prospect of social regime transition. Economy and Society 117: 18–61.
• Kim, K. 1979. The sociology of development. Seoul: Moonji Publishing Company.
• Ku, A. 1998. Boundary politics in the public sphere—Openness, secrecy and
leak. Sociological Theory 16 (2): 172–192.
• Ku, A. 1999. Narratives, politics and the public sphere—Struggles over political reform
in the final transitional years in Hong Kong (1992–94). Aldershot: Ashgate.
• Ku, A. 2000. Revisiting the notion of “public” in Habermas’s theory—Towards a theory
of politics of public credibility. Sociological Theory 18 (2): 216–240.
• Ku, A. 2001a. The ‘public’ up against the state—Narrative cracks and credibility crisis in
postcolonial Hong Kong. Theory, Culture, and Society 18 (1): 121–144.
• Ku, A. 2001b. Hegemonic construction, negotiation and displacement—Struggle over
right of abode in Hong Kong. International Journal of Cultural Studies 4 (3): 259–278.
Ku, A. 2002a. Post-colonial cultural trends in Hong Kong— Imagining the local, the
national and the global. In Crisis and Transformation in China’s Hong Kong, ed. M.K.
Chan and A. So, 343–362. New York: Hong Kong University Press.
• Ku, A. 2002b. Beyond the paradoxical conception of “civil society without
citizenship.” International Sociology 17(4), 551–570. (Also translated and published in
the Russian-language monthly Sociological Studies, Sotsiologhitsheskiye Issledovanya,
December 2003).
• Ku, A. 2004a. Immigration policies, discourses, and the politics of local belonging in
Hong Kong (1950–80). Modern China 30 (3): 326–360.
• Ku, A. 2004b. Negotiating the space of civil autonomy in Hong Kong—power,
discourses and dramatic representations. The China Quarterly 179: 647–664.
• Ku, A. 2007. State power, political theatre & reinvention of the pro-democracy
movement in Hong Kong—the march on the first of July in 2003. In Power and
performance in Asia & Africa, ed. J.C. Strauss and D.C. O’Brien, 195–214. London: IB
Tauris.
• Ku, A. 2009. Civil society’s dual impetus—mobilizations, representations and
contestations over the first of July in 2003. In Government and politics in Hong
Kong—Crises under Chinese Sovereignty, ed. Ming Sing, 38–57. London:
RoutledgeCurzon.
• Ku, A. 2010. Making heritage in Hong Kong: A case study of the Central Police Station
Compound. The China Quarterly 202: 381–399.
• Ku, A. 2012. Re-making places and fashioning an opposition discourse—struggle over
the Star Ferry Pier and the Queen’s Pier in Hong Kong. Environment and Planning D:
Space and Society 30: 5–22.
Ku, A. 2018. Identity as politics—contesting the local, the national, and the global.
In Routledge handbook of contemporary Hong Kong, ed. T. Lui, W.K. Chiu, and R. Yep,
451–461. London: Routledge.
• Ku, A. 2019. In search of a new political subjectivity in Hong Kong: The Umbrella
Movement as a street theatre of generational change. The China Journal 82: 111–132.
• Ku, A., and H. Wang. 2004. The making and unmaking of civic solidarity—comparing
the coping responses of civil societies in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Asian Perspective 28
(1): 121–147.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
