Self-Assessment Towards Continuous Professional Development of Islamic Education Teachers: A Research Approach Using Mixed Methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/gp8bsp56Keywords:
continuous professional development, instrument development, Islamic education teacher, mixed methods, self-assessmentAbstract
The study aimed to understand the mixed-method approach as a research design for self-assessment study of Islamic Education Teachers (IET) towards Continuous Professional Development. The selection of this method was based on the needs of the study that required for researcher to get a real picture of the concept of self-assessment among IETs from the view of individuals with well experience in this field. The level of self-assessment practice will be taken for the next stage of the study. This type of mixed method known as exploratory sequential design that began with a qualitative approach and followed with a quantitative approach. The findings of interview with six experienced Islamic Education experts who were selected based on certain criteria used as a basis for the questionnaire instrument development that later used to obtain further quantitative data for this study. This article stressed the importance of the selection of this method by looking at the needs and how the data from the two methods can be connected to answer the research objective of the study.
Downloads
References
1. Ajem, R., & Memon, N. (2011). Principles of Islamic Pedagogy: A Teacher’s Manual. Islamic Teacher Education
Program. Toronto: Canada Razi Group.
2. Akbari, R., Behzadpoor, F., & Dadvand, B. (2010). Development of English language teaching reflection
inventory. System, 38(2), 211-227.
3. Akram, M., & Zepeda, S. J. (2015). Development and Validation of a Teacher Self-assessment Instrument. Journal of
Research & Reflections in Education (JRRE), 9(2), 134 – 148. professional growth. Teaching and teacher Education,
23(2), 146-159.
4. Baba, S. (2006). Kefahaman ilmu dan keterampilan pendidikan dalam upaya pembaharuan (tajdid). Archived http://drsidekbaba.blogspot.com/2006/12/kefahaman-ilmu-dan-ketrampilan.html
5. Creswell, J. W., V. L. Plano Clark, M. Gutmann, and W. Hanson. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs.
In Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences, ed. A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 209–40.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
6. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd. Ed. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage Publications.
7. Floyd, J. A. (1993). The use of across-method triangulation in the study of sleep concerns in healthy older
adults. Advances in Nursing Science.
8. Gorard, S., & Taylor, C. (2004). Combining methods in educational and social research. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
9. DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage
publications.
10. Djigić, G., Stojiljković, S., & Dosković, M. (2014). Basic personality dimensions and teachers’ self-efficacy. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 593-602.
11. Fletcher, S. (1992). Competency-Based Assessment Technique. London: Kogan Publishers.
12. Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V.J., Graham, W.F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation
designs. Edu. Eval. Policy Analysis. 11(3), 255–274.
13. Hussin, H. (2000). Daya Berfikir dan Struktur Pemikiran Refleksi Kritikal (Critical Reflection): Bagaimana Amalannya
Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Jurnal Teknologi, 31(E): 31-41.
14. Hussin, H. (2004). Learning to be reflective from theory to practices: Malaysia experiences. Tanjong Malim: Penerbit
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
15. Haertel, G. D. (1993). A Primer on Teacher Self-Evaluation. Washington: Publication Series No. 93-3.
16. Hixson, N. K., Ravitz, J., & Whisman, A. (2012). Extended Professional Development in Project-Based Learning:
Impacts on 21st Century Skills Teaching and Student Achievement. West Virginia Department of Education.
17. Safar, J. (2012). Pembinaan Instrumen Pentaksiran Akhlak berasaskan rakan sebaya pelajar sekolah menengah.
18. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has
come. Educational researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
19. Kamus Dewan. (2016). Edisi Keempat. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
20. Kočvarová, I., Machů, E., & Petrůjová, J. (2016). Self-assessment of teachers working with gifted pupils in terms of
their work experience and education. In ICERI2016 Proceedings (pp. 8148-8153). IATED.
21. Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. 1970. Determining sample size for research education and psychological measurement.
Education and Psychological Measurement 3: 607-610.
22. Makhsin, M. (2012). Hisbah dan Penghayatan Akhlak Murid Sekolah Menengah. Doctoral Thesis. Universiti
Kebangsaan Malaysia.
23. Masuwai, A., Zulkifli, H., & Tamuri, A. H. (2021). Systematic Literature Review on Self-Assessment Inventory for
Quality Teaching among Islamic Education Teachers. Sustainability, 14(1), 203.
24. Mezirow, J. (1990). How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood,
1(20): 1-6. NY: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
25. Miles dan Huberman (1994) Qualitative data analysis: as expanded sourcebook. 2nd. Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications.
26. Miles, H., & Huberman, A. M. & Saldana. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, 3.
27. Min, W. Y., Mansor, R., & Samsudin, S. (2017). Facilitating reflective practice in teacher education: An analysis of
student teachers’ level of reflection during teacher clinical experience. International Journal of Academic Research in
Business and Social Sciences, 7(3), 599-612.
28. Myers, K. K., & Oetzel, J. G. (2003). Exploring the dimensions of organizational assimilation: Creating and validating
a measure. Communication Quarterly, 51(4), 438-457.
29. Nordhaug, O., & Gronhaug, K. (1994). Competences as resources in firms. International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 5(1), 89-106.
30. Osman, B. H. A., & Basar, M. N. (2015). Penilaian Kendiri Amalan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21
Pensyarah Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Ipoh. In Conference Paper Keningau (pp. 1-35).
31. Rahman, B. (2014). Refleksi Diri dan Upaya Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru Sekolah Dasar di Provinsi Lampung.
Refleksi Diri dan Upaya Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru Sekolah Dasar, 17(1), 1-14.
32. Ravit, J. (2014). A survey for measuring 21st century teaching and learning: West Virginia 21st Century Teaching and
Learning Survey [WVDE-CIS-28]. Archieved from
researchgate.net/publication/289377968_A_survey_for_measuring_21st_century_teaching_and_learning_West_Virgi
nia_21st_Century_Teaching_and_Learning_Survey_WVDE-CIS-28#fullTextFileContent
33. Salleh, S. M. (2018). Pembinaan Konstruk Instrumen Penilaian Kendiri Akhlak Guru Pendidikan Islam Menurut
Pandangan Pakar. UMRAN-International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies, 5(3), 1-11.
34. Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., & Sugai, G. (2006). Classroom management: Self-assessment revised. Storrs,
CT: OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. Retrieved June, 24, 2011.
35. Sulaiman, A. M. (2014). Peranan guru pendidikan Islam dalam pembentukan akhlak murid dari aspek hubungan gurumurid berasaskan Abu Talib al-Makki (W.386h/996m). Doctoral Thesis, Universiti Malaya.
36. Takwin, B., Singgih, E. E., & Panggabean, S. K. (2012). The Role of Self-Management In Increasing Subjective WellBeing Of Dki Jakarta’s Citizens. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 16(1), 1-8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
