Project-Based Learning Model to Improve Students 'Ability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/r887ms20Keywords:
Project Base Learning, Ability, ConfidenceAbstract
The research was conducted to develop economic teaching materials to improve the ability and confidence of high school students in economic learning. Research is also focused on providing experience to teachers, specifically in developing teaching materials using project-based learning and applying it to learning. The method in the research to be carried out is development (research and development) and continued with quasi-experimental (quasi-experiment) collaborating with class teachers. Stages of research to be carried out, namely: (1) the preparation phase, (2) the development stage, (3) the experimental stage, and (4) evaluation. At the development stage of teaching materials using the Plomp model (2010), which includes (1) preliminary research, (2) prototyping phase, and (3) assessment phase. Furthermore, at the application stage, a collaborative experiment is carried out where the implementation of learning collaborates with the teacher. In the experimental stage, carried out by taking each of the two classes from each school as an experimental class and a control class. The results of this study are the creation of teaching materials that meet valid and practical criteria and there is an influence of teaching materials based on project learning on students' abilities and confidence
Downloads
References
1. Aiken, L. R. 1980. Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and psychological measurement, pp. 955-959.
2. Arends, R., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning: becoming an accomplished teacher.Routledge.New York.
3. Eggen, P. & Kochak, D. (2012). Learning strategies and models of teaching content and thinking skills. Pearson Educational,Inc.Boston.
4. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palinscar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: supporting the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 369-398.
5. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research & Development, 40(1), 65-80.
6. Dodge, B. (1995, May 5, 1997). Some thoughts about WebQuests [online]. Available: http://edweb.sdsu.edu/courses/edtect596/about_webquests.html [2001, August 7].
7. Dodge, B. (1998, June 22-24). WebQuests: A strategy for scaffolding higher-level learning. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, San Diego, CA.
8. Drake, F. D., & McBride, L. W. (1997). Reinvigorating the teaching of history through alternative assessment. The History Teacher, 30, 145-173.
9. Filcik, A. et al. (2012). The effects of project-based learning (PjBL) approaches on the achievement and efficacy of high school mathematics students: a longitudinal study investigating the effects of the PjBL approach in mathematics education. Proceedings of the National Conference on Undergraduate Research (NCUR), 29-31 March 2012. OdgenUtah: Weber StateUniversity, Utah.
10. Guo, S., & Yang, Y. (2012). Project-based learning: an effective approach to link teacher professional development and student learning. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, December 2012, Volume 5, No. 2, pp. 41-56.
11. Harel, I., & Papert, S. (Eds.). (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Harris, J. H., & Katz, L. G. (2001). Young investigators: The project approach in the early years. New York.
12. Hoover, L. A., & Taylor, R. (1998). Exploring Vietnam: A multipleintelligence portfolio of learning. Social Education, 62(2), 93-96.
13. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction.
14. Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996). Constructionism in practice: designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Land, S. M. & Greene, B. A. (2000). Project-based learning with the world wide web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(1), 45-67.
16. Levstik, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (2001). Doing history. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997).Enacting project-based science. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 341-358.
18. McArdle, G. 2010. Instructional design for action learning. Amacom. NewYork
19. Moursund, D. (1998). Project-based learning in an information-technology environment. Learning and Leading with Technology, 25(8), 4.
20. Patton, A. 2012. Work that matters: the teacher’s guide for project-based learning.ThePaul HamlynFoundation.California
21. Plomp, T. 2010. An introductionaltoeducationaldesignresearch.Proceedingsof the seminar conducted atthe the East normal University, Beijing
22. Perkins, D. N. (1991). What constructivism demands of the learner. Educational Technology, 31, 18-23.
23. Piaget, J. (1969). Science of education and the psychology of the child. New York: Viking.
24. Pickett, N., & Dodge, B. (2001, June 20, 2001). Rubrics for web lessons [online]. Available:
http://edweb.sdsu.edu/webquest/rubrics/weblessons.htm [2001, August 7].
25. Scott, C. (1994). Project-based science: Reflections of a middle school teacher. Elementary School Journal, 57(1), 1-22.
26. Socha, T. J., & Socha, D. M. (1994). Children's task-group communication. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups. Hillsdale: NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Starr, L. (2000). Creating a WebQuest: It's easier than you think! [Online]. Available: http://www.educationworld.com/a_tech/tech011.shtml[2001, August 7].
28. Tassinari, M. (1996). Hands-on projects take students beyond thebook. Social Studies Review, 34(3), 16-20.
29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
30. Wolk, S. (1994). Project-based learning: Pursuits with a purpose. Educational Leadership, 52(3), 42-45.
31. Worthy, J. (2000). Conducting research on topics of student interest. Reading Teacher, 54(3), 298-299.
32. Yoder, M. B. (1999). The student WebQuest. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26(7).
33. Zvacek, S. M. (1999). What's my grade? Assessing learner progress. TechTrends, 43(5), 39-43
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
