Emotional Intelligence in Small and Medium Entreprises: Exploring its Effect on Ambidextrous Behaviours and Firm Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/r46k4t58Keywords:
Ambidextrous behaviours, Emotional Intelligence, Business Performance, Small and Medium Entreprises, MalaysiaAbstract
This paper contributes to the growing body of research that focuses on the antecedents of ambidextrous behaviours, that is, understanding the role of emotional intelligence influencing ambidextrous behaviours. One central challenge caused by ambidextrous behaviours is the divergence mindset catering to the contradiction of exploitative and explorative behaviours. The manner in which owner-managers recognize with and act out contradictory demands provides an insight into the balancing act of ambidextrous behaviours. Following theory of dynamic capability, the present paper simultaneously analyzes antecedents and consequences of ambidextrous behaviours. Regarding the antecedents, the present study sought to identify the dimensional roles of emotional intelligence (EI) influencing ambidextrous behaviours. With regard to consequences, the paper analyses the impact of ambidextrous behaviours on firm performance among owner-managers from small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Kuala Lumpur and Selangor, Malaysia. Out of 1,000 invited respondents, a total of 220 owner-managers participated in this research. 183 useable data were analysed usingPartial Least Squares (SmartPLSv3.2.7), result indicates that all four dimensions of EI positively influence ambidextrous behaviours and there is a positive impact of ambidextrous behaviours on firm performance among SMES in Malaysia. This study adds to the limited theoretical and empirical understanding of the role of EI and ambidextrous behaviorus. This present study concludes by highlighting scope and significance of these findings for theory, managerial practice, and future research.
Downloads
References
1. Alghamdi, F. (2018). Ambidextrous leadership, ambidextrous employee, and the interaction between
ambidextrous leadership and employee innovative performance. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship,
7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-018-0081-8
2. Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., and Collier, N. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew
their resource base. British Journal of Management, 20, 1–41.
3. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-theScience Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–
1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
4. Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the
resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27, 643– 650.
5. Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., Farr, J., Bledow, R., and Dialectic, J. F. A. (2009). A Dialectic
Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands, Multiple Pathways, and Ambidexterity. Industrial and
Organizational Psychology, 2, 305–337.
6. Borch, O. J., and Madsen, E. L. (2007). Dynamic capabilities facilitating innovative strategies in SMEs.
International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, 1(1), 109-125.
7. Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions,
contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20, 781–796.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0111
8. Chang, Y. Y., & Hughes, M. (2012). Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small- to medium-sized firms.
European Management Journal, 30(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2011.08.003
9. Chang, Y. Y., Hughes, M., and Hotho, S. (2011). Internal and external antecedents of SMEs’ innovation
ambidexterity outcomes. Management Decision, 49(10), 1658–1676.
10. Chin, W.W., 1998. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for
business research, 295(2), 295–336.
11. Choi, Y. R., & Shepherd, D. A. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ decisions to exploit opportunities. Journal of
Management, 30(3), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.04.002
12. Darvishmotevali, M., Altinay, L., & De Vita, G. (2018). Emotional intelligence and creative performance: Looking through the lens of environmental uncertainty and cultural intelligence. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 73(February), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.01.014
13. Eisenhardt, K. M., and Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105–1121.
14. Gibson, C. B., &Birkinshaw, J. (2004). the Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational
Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159573
15. Goleman, D.: Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships. Bantam Books, New York (2006)
16. Hahn, M. H., Choi, D. Y., & Lee, K. C. (2011). Effects of Social and Emotional Intelligence on the Creative
Process and Individual Creativity. Science And Technology, 217–226.
17. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural
Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
18. Helfat, C., Peteraf, M., (2009). The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strategic Management
Journal. 24, 997–1010.
19. Henseler, J., and Fassott, G. (2009). Testing Moderating Effects in PLS Path Models: An Illustration of
Available Procedures. Handbook of Partial Least Squares.
20. Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., &Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A
Meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312.
21. Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., and Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A
Meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312.
22. Kao, Y. L., & Chen, C. F. (2016). Antecedents, consequences and moderators of ambidextrous behaviours
among frontline employees. Management Decision, 54(8), 1846–1860. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2015-
0187
23. Kauppila, O. P., and Tempelaar, M. P. (2016). The social-cognitive underpinnings of employees’ ambidextrous
behavior and the supportive role of group managers' leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 53(6), 1019-
1044.
24. Koryak, O., Lockett, A., Hayton, J., Nicolaou, N., & Mole, K. (2018). Disentangling the antecedents of
ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation. Research Policy, 47(2), 413–427.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.003
25. Kurtmollaiev, Seidali, (2015). Reconsidering dynamic capabilities: implications for innovation research.
DRUID, 2015.
26. Kusunoki, K., Nonaka, I., and Nagata, A. (1998). Organizational capabilities in product development of
Japanese firms: A conceptual framework and empirical findings. Organization Science, 9(6), 699–718.
27. Levinthal, D.A. and March, J.G. (1993) The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95-112.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
28. Lin, Y., and Wu, L. Y. (2014). Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the
resource-based view framework. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 407–413.
29. Liu, C., Sia, C. L., & Wei, K. K. (2008). Adopting organizational virtualization in B2B firms: An empirical
study in Singapore. Information & Management, 45(7), 429–437. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.06.005
30. Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., &Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to
Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration. Journal of
Management, 32(5), 646–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712
31. Luo, Y. (2000). Dynamic capabilities in international expansion. Journal of World Business, 35(4), 355-378.
32. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
33. Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is Emotional Intelligence? Emotional Development and Emotional
Intelligence: Implications for Educators (3-31). New York: Basic Books
34. O’Reilly, C. A., and Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future. Academy
of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338.
35. Pertusa-Ortega, E. M., & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2018). A joint analysis of determinants and performance
consequences of ambidexterity. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21(2), 84–98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.03.001
36. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in
behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied
Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
37. Poon, W. C., Mohamad, O., &Yusoff, W. F. W. (2018a). The impact of Behavioural Complexity on Exploitative and Explorative Behaviour among Owner-Managers of SMEs in Malaysia. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 1–13.
38. Poon, W. C., Mohamad, O., &Yusoff, W. F. W. (2018b). Examining the Antecedents of Ambidextrous Behaviours in Promoting Creativity among SMEs in Malaysia. Global Business Review, 21(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150918779267.
39. Popadić, M., Černe, M., &Milohnić, I. (2015). Organizational Ambidexterity, Exploration, Exploitation and
Firms Innovation Performance. Organizacija, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/orga-2015-0006
40. Raisch, S., and Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators.
Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409.
41. Relojo, D., Janice Pilao, S., & Dela Rosa, R. (2015). From passion to emotion: Emotional quotient as predictor
of work attitude behavior among faculty members. I-Manager’s Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(4), 1–10.
42. Rosing, K., Frese, M., and Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation
relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956–974.
43. SME Masterplan 2012-2020. SME Corporation Malaysia.
44. Stock, G. N., McFadden, K. L., & Gowen, C. R. (2007). Organizational culture, critical success factors, and the
reduction of hospital errors. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(2), 368–
392.doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.07.005
45. Teece, D. J. (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable)
enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13):1319–1350.
46. Teece, D. J. (2014). The Foundations of Enterprise Performance: Dynamic and Ordinary Capabilities in an
Economic theory of firms. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328–352.
47. Teece, D., Pisano, G., &Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic
Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
48. Teece, D., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic
Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
49. Tushman, M. L., and O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and
revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.
50. Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., and Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in
marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing
Science, 44(1), 119–134.
51. Webb, Brian and Schlemmer, Frank (2008). The managing director and the development of dynamic capabilities: An application of enactment theory. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 16(1-2), 109–137.
52. Wong, C., & Law, K. S. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 243–274.
53. Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J. and Davidsson, P. (2006), Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x
54. Zhou, J., and George, J. M. (2001). When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
