International Law versus Piracy: Issues in Legal Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/tfs3mq23Keywords:
Piracy, International Custom, UNCLOS, SUA Convention, Repression of Piracy, High Seas, International Law of the Sea, Seizure of a Pirate Ship, Hostis Humani GenerisAbstract
The article examines the theoretical framework of interpreting the existing rules of international customary and treaty law applicable to the repression of piracy. The main characteristics of crime “piracy” are their focus on the high seas or to the exclusive economic zone (EEZ), or to another place “outside jurisdiction of any State” and the crime of piracy is committed for “private ends” by a “private” ship or aircraft against another ship (or other ships). Such criteria are provided, in concreto, in art. 100 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). However, interpretation of UNCLOS rules on piracy raises questions. While addressing them, this paper contains an executive summary of problems concerning piracy in the context of applicable norms of international law making special emphasis on the necessity to respect relevant customary rules. In this context, the paper examines questions such as the legal concept of piracy in historical perspective; the “humanitarian” attitude towards pirates, suggested in UNCLOS; States’ conduct of anti-piracy operations; various interpretations of conventional terms, including “for private ends” and “against another ship”; current enforcement measures against piracy; and examination of other theoretical issues in the legal combat against piracy. In addition to introducing key elements of analysis and the results, the paper reviews rationales for related research studies and existing literature on the subject. This review is followed by focus on the research methodology and procedures used in the study and a discussion of data analysis techniques. Special attention is also paid to existing gaps in legal research as well as to inconsistencies and/or controversies in applicable treaty rules or in relevant legal teachings. A conceptual framework explaining the main findings and the results of this enquiry are summarized. Examples of piracy attacks provided in the article include their statistics, while highlighting that only about half of piracy attacks and relevant damage to ship-owners is officially reported. The paper also addresses managerial implications, limitations and directions for further research on the topic under investigation. The article ends with an appropriate conclusion and references.
Downloads
References
[1] Anderson, D. (2002). The role of ITLOS as a Means of Dispute Settlement // Schofield C. et al. (eds.). The razor’s edge: international boundaries and political geography. Essays in honour of Professor Gerald Blake. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 573, 19 - 29.
[2] Anyiam, H.I. (2014). When Piracy is Just Armed Robbery. Maritime executive. 19.07.2014
URL: https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/When-Piracy-is-Just-Armed-Robbery-2014-07-19
(visited at: 02 April 2019).
[3] Azubuike, L. (2009). International Law Regime against Piracy. Annual Survey of International and
Comparative Law. 15(1), Article 4, 43-59.
[4] Bartels-Leipold B. (2012). Internationaler Gerichtshof für Piraterie: eine Untersuchung temporärer und
permanenter Perspektiven für eine internationalisierte Strafverfolgung der Piraterie. Saarbrücken:
Saarbrücker Verlag für Rechtswissenschaften, 545: 377 - 385.
[5] Combs, C., Slann, M. (eds.)(2007). Encyclopedia of terrorism. New York: Facts on File, 478, 257.
[6] Dutton, Y. (2010). Bringing pirates to justice: a case for including piracy within the jurisdiction of the
International Criminal Court. Chicago Journal of International Law, 11, 197 - 241.
[7] Ehrhart H.G., Petretto K., & Schneider, P. (2011). Security governance als Rahmenkonzept fuer die
Analyse von Piraterie und maritimem Terrorismus. Hamburg: Institut fuer Friedensforschung und
Sicherheitspolitik an der Universitaet Hamburg, 69S.
[8] Gebert, H. (1914). Die voelkerrechtliche Denationalisierung der Piraterie. Kiel: Universitaetsbuchdruckerei
von Schmidt & Klaunig, 68S.
[9] Geiss, R., & Petrig, A. (2011). Piracy and armed robbery at sea: the legal framework for counter-piracy
operations in Somalia and the Gulf of Aden. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 321.
[10] Golitsyn, V. (2012). Maritime security (case of piracy) // Isanga H. [et al.] Coexistence, Cooperation and
Solidarity. Lieber Amoricum Rüdiger Wolfrum. Vol. II. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2211, 1157 –
1176.
[11] Graf, A. (2011). Countering Piracy and Maritime Terrorism in South East Asia and off the Horn of Africa:
applying the lessons learned from the countermeasures against maritime violence in the Strait of Malacca to
the Gulf of Aden. Hamburg: Institut fuer Friedensforschung und Sicherheitspolitik an der Universität
Hamburg, 58 p.
[12] Graham, C. (2009). Maritime Security and Seafarers’ Welfare: Towards Harmonization. WMU Journal of
Maritime Affairs, 8(1), 71-87.
[13] Guilfoyle, D. (2011). Piracy prosecutions and international law. BIMCO Bulletin, 106(2), 86 – 88.
[14] Isanga, J. (2009). Countering persistent contemporary sea piracy: expanding jurisdictional regimes.
American University Law Review, 59, 1267 – 1320.
[15] Jacobsson M. Terrorism at sea // Mukherjee P.K. et al. (eds.) Maritime violence and other security issues at
sea: the proceedings of the symposium on maritime violence and other security issues at sea Malmö:
WMU, 2002 PP. 157 – 163. X, 270 p.
[16] Jenisch U. Piracy, Navies and the Law of the Sea; the Case of Somalia. // WMU Journal of Maritime
Affairs, Vol. 8. 2009. No. 2, 123 – 143.
[17] Joyner C. Navigating troubled waters. Somalia, piracy and maritime terrorism. // The Georgetown of
international affairs. 2009. Vol. 10. PP. 83 – 91.
[18] Kelley R.P. Note: UNCLOS, but No Cigar: Overcoming Obstacles to the Prosecution of Maritime Piracy //
Minnesota Law Review. Volume 102- Issue 6 2018 [95:2285]
[19] König D., Salomon T.R., Neumann T., Kolb A.S. Piraterie und maritimer Terrorismus als
Herausforderungen für die Seesicherheit: Objektive Rechtsunsicherheit im Völker-, Europa- und deutschen
Recht. URL: https://d-nb.info/1013880013/34 (visited at: 02 April 2019).
[20] Konte J. Morskoe piratstvo i mezhdunarodnoe pravo: avtoreferat dis. … k.ju.n.: 12.00.10. MGU im. M.V.
Lomonosova. Moscow, 1990. 27 p.
[21] Mejia M., Cariou P., Wolff F.-C. Ship piracy: ship type and flag. In: Talley W. Maritime safety, security
and piracy. London: Informa, 2008. 344 p. PP. 103 – 120.
[22] Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: ucheb. Otv.red. Kovalev A., Chernichenko S. 3-e izd. M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2008. 832 p.
[23] Mineau M. Pirates, blackwater and maritime security: the rise of private navies in response to modern piracy // Journal of International Business & Law. 2010. Vol. 9. PP. 63 – 78.
[24] Münchau M. Terrorismus auf See aus völkerrechtlicher Sicht. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1994. 251 S.
[25] Murphy M. Small boats, weak states, dirty money: the challenge of piracy. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009. 539 p.
[26] Özçayir Z. Piracy. Part II. // The journal of international maritime law. Volume 16. Issue 2. 2010. PP. 161 –168.
[27] Paige T.P. The Implementation and Effectiveness of UNCLOS on Counter Piracy Operations // Journal of
Conflict and Security Law. Pp. 1 – 35.
[28] Piracy and armed robbery against ships. Report for the period 1 January – 30 June 2016. London: ICC
IMB, 2012 // International Chamber of Commerce International Maritime Bureau (ICC IMB). [2016].
URL: http://www.icc-ccs.org/ (visited at: 02 April 2019).
[29] Piracy and armed robbery against ships. Report for the period 1 January - 31 June 2019. London: ICC IMB,
2019 // International Chamber of Commerce International Maritime Bureau (ICC IMB). [2019]. URL:
http://www.icc-ccs.org/ (visited at: 06 August 2019).
[30] Piracy and armed robbery against ships. Report for the period 1 January – 31 December 2011. London: ICC
IMB, 2012 // International Chamber of Commerce International Maritime Bureau (ICC IMB). [2016].
URL: http://www.icc-ccs.org/ (visited at: 02 April 2019).
[31] Piracy and armed robbery against ships. Report for the period 1 January – 31 December 2015. London: ICC
IMB, 2016 // International Chamber of Commerce International Maritime Bureau (ICC IMB). [2016].
URL: http://www.icc-ccs.org/ (visited at: 02 April 2019).
[32] Piracy and armed robbery against ships. Report for the period 1 January – 31 December 2018. London: ICC
IMB, 2018 // International Chamber of Commerce International Maritime Bureau (ICC IMB). [2018].
URL: http://www.icc-ccs.org/ (visited at: 02 April 2019).
[33] Qureshi W.A. The Prosecution of Pirates and the Enforcement of Counter-Piracy Laws Are Virtually
Incapacitated by Law Itself // 19San Diego Int'l L.J.95 (2017) URL:
http://digital.sandiego.edu/ilj/vol19/iss1/5 (visited at: 02 April 2019).
[34] Reuland R.C.F. Interference with Non-National Ships on the High Seas Peacetime Exceptions to the
Exclusivity Rule of Flag-State Jurisdiction // Vanderbilt journal of transnational law. 1989. № 22. РР. 1161
– 1229.
[35] Romashev J.S. Bor'ba s piratstvom i vooruzhennym razboem na more (pravovye osnovy i praktika).
Moscow: Izdatel'stvo «TransLit», 2012. 336 p.
[36] Shapiro A. Multiple approaches must be taken to manage the piracy problem. In: Miller D. Modern-day
piracy. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. 219 p. PP. 137-147.
[37] Sidorchenko V.F. Morskoe piratstvo. St. Petersburg: Izdatel'skij Dom S.-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo
universiteta, Izdatel'stvo juridicheskogo fakul'teta S.-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2004.
400 p.
[38] Talley W., Rule E. Piracy in shipping // Talley W. Maritime safety, security and piracy. London: Informa,
2008. 344 p. PP. 89-101.
[39] Todd P. Maritime fraud and piracy. 2nd ed. London: Lloyd's List, 2010. 329 p.
[40] Transnational piracy: to pay or to prosecute? In: American Society of International Law Proceedings, Vol. 105, 2011. PP. 543 – 554.
[41] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). Maritime piracy. Part II. An overview of the international legal framework and of multilateral cooperation to combat piracy /Studies in Transport Law and Policy. 2014. No. 2. United Nations: New York and Geneva, 2014. URL: http://unctad.org/ttl/legal (visited at: 02 April 2019).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
