Contemporary Trends in International Economic Integration: Challenges and Prospects

Authors

  • Nurislom Tukhliev Doctor of Economics Professor at International islamic academy of Uzbekistan, Department "Islamic economy and finance, ziyarah tourism Author
  • Ravshan Abdullayev Doctor of Economics Professor at International islamic academy of Uzbekistan, Department "Islamic economy and finance, ziyarah tourism Author
  • Gulyamova Gulnora Phd in economics, Senior lecturer at International islamic academy of Uzbekistan, Department "Islamic economy and finance, ziyarah tourism Author
  • Nilufar Batirova Senior lecturer at International islamic academy of Uzbekistan, Department "Islamic economy and finance, ziyarah tourism Author
  • Jiyanov Uktam Lecturer at International islamic academy of Uzbekistan, Department "Islamic economy and finance, ziyarah tourism Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/6wmzmt92

Keywords:

integration, disintegration, EU, trade, capital, labor force, GDP, Brexit, international economic integration, NAFTA

Abstract

In the second half of the 20th century, the system of international economic relations widely studied regional and international economic integration processes and their trade, capital and migration relations. However, as a result of disintegration processes in the system of international economic relations in the 21st century, disintegration processes in the European Union and North America have begun to be widely investigated. This article also examines the integration and disintegration processes in the global economy and highlights the urgency of the topic. The study analyzes the stages of EU integration and the causes that led to the disintegration, the peculiarities of the integration processes in North America, and their impact on the integration of Central Asian countries 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Balassa, B. (1966) Tariff reductions and trade in manufactures among industrial countries.// American Economic Review 56.-1966. 466–473.

2. Balassa, B. (1967). Trade liberalization among industrial countries: Objectives and alternatives, ch. 5.-.1967, (McGraw-Hill for the Council on Foreign Relations, New York) .;

3. Balassa, B. (1975). European economic integration, ch. 2.- 1975. (North-Holland, Amsterdam) .;

4. Krugman, P. (2001). Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade.// American Economic Review 70, 950–959.-1980 .; W. Beck. What is globalization? M: Progress Tradition. 2001 .;

5. Shishkov, Y. (2001). Integration processes on the threshold of the 21st century. Why CIS countries donot integrate. M., III millennium, 2001 .;

6. Shishkov, Y.V. (2012). Challenges of the new historical era // Journal Club "Intelros". The century of globalization. 2012. -No1 [Electron resource]: //http://www.intelros.ru / readroom / vek-globalizacii / -1-9-2012 / 14388-vyzovy-novoy-istoricheskoy;

7. Huntington, S. (2003). Clash of Civilizations? M .: AST, 2003;

8. Urunov, A.A. (2003). Integration and economic growth // A.A. Urunov. -M .: Grail, 2003. -424 p .;

9. Roepke, W. (1959). International Order and Economic Integration. 1959. P.72 .;

10. Harris, S. (1957). International and Interregional Economics. NY 1957;

11. Misko, O.N. (2015). International Economic Integration. St. Petersburg 2015. S.133-135.

12. Nazarova, G.G.&Kurbaniyazov, Sh. (2014). Problems of economic integration of Uzbekistan //“Economics and Innovation Technology” scientific electronic journal//No. 6, November-December, 2014 yil [Electron resource]: http://iqtisodiyot.uz/sites/default/file s / maqolalar / 22_G_Nazarova.pdf;

13. Sirojiddinov, N. (2016). Free trade zone between the CIS and Uzbekistan: arguments for and against. //Xalqaro Munosabatlar. Journal. No. 3.-2016-P.100-113;

14. Machlup, F. (1977). A History of Thought of Economic Integration. L.1977. P.7.

15. Grandars (2018). Stages of formation and development of the European Union (EU) //http://www.grandars.ru/student/mirovaya-ekonomika/istoriya-es.html

16. The economic consequences & how they could be mitigated Archived October 19, 2018 at Wayback Machine, Open Europe, 10/2018.

17. Ukrinform (2016). If NAFTA does not become North America, the disintegration of the region will deepen, and with it the rest of the world. https://www.ukrinform.ru/rubric-world/2532514-torgovyeperegovory-ssa-i-kanady-sah- i-mat-svobodnoj-torgovle.html

18. Anisimov, A.&Popova, A. (2014). Structural modeling of interpretations of economic processes in primary Eurasian integration processes. Eurasian economic integration. Structural and topological model for the interpretation of economic data on Eurasian integration processes. Eurasian economic integration. 2014. No. 4. URL: http://www.eabr.org/r/research-/publication/ eei / index.php? Id_16 = 44797

19. Batirova N. S. Features of the development of the tashkent region in an innovative economy //European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. – 2018. – №. 6. – С. 159-162.https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37112705.

Downloads

Published

30.04.2020

How to Cite

Tukhliev, N., Abdullayev, R., Gulnora, G., Batirova, N., & Uktam, J. (2020). Contemporary Trends in International Economic Integration: Challenges and Prospects. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), 308-313. https://doi.org/10.61841/6wmzmt92