Word Valence and Syntactic Relationship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/m5gta282Keywords:
Valence, words, unit of speech, substantive approach, semantics, semantic relation, semantic connection, verbAbstract
The article is devoted to the word, the valence of the word and the syntactic connection between them. In it, the word embeds as a bearer of all its just properties, qualities and relationships. A substantial approach to the word summarizes the results of the study of lexical-semantic and grammatical tiers; these tiers appear in dialectical unity. In speech, the semantics of a single word interacts with the semantic structure of the whole utterance.
At present, the basic laws governing the combination of one unit of language with another are united by the concept of valence. The valence of a word as a substantial-semantic fact is connected with the meaning of the word and the realization of its meaning in the construction of the sentence.
The semantic relation between words directly reveals a syntactic relation, which is fixed in the formation of syntactic construction, since semantic relations exist on the basis of syntactic ones.
Downloads
References
1. Potebnya A.A.From the notes on Russian grammar. vol.1-2. M., 1958,p.84.
2. Loya Y.V.-M. History of Linguistic Exercises, 1968, p. 184.
3. See: Ivanov S.N.Genealogical tree of Turks of Abu-l-gasi-khana.-Tashkent, 1969,p.20.
4. TugarinovV.P. Correlation of the category of dialectical materialism..-L.1956 p.26.
5. See: Solntsev V.M. Language as a system-structural formation.M., 1971, p.16.
6. Gak V.G.Semantic structure of a word as a component of semantic structure statement. Semantic structure of a word. M.,1971.p.90.
7. See: Aspects of general and private linguistic theory of the text. M., 1982, p.18.
8. Stepanova M.D.Helbig G.Part of speech and the problem of valence in modern non-German language. M.,1978.p.138.
9. On the theory of valence (the term valence) see. Stepanova M.D., Helbig G. specified work. Ivanova I.P., Burlakova.V.V., Pochaptsov G.G. Theoretical grammar of the modern English language. M., 1981, P.109-110.
10. Katsnelson S.D.O. Grammar Category. Vestnik L.GU.1948.No.2. 11.Qo’chqortoyev I.Q. So’z ma’nosi va uning valentligi. Toshkent, 1977, b.73. 12. Qo’chqortoyev I. So’z valentligi haqida. O’zbek tili va adabiyoti.1973.№3, b.35.
11. See: Apresyan Y.D.Lexical semantics. Synonymic means of language M.,1974.p.79-94.
12. See: Problems of semantics.M.,1974.p.4.
13. Gak.V.G.K. Problems of semantic syntagmatics. Problems of Structural Linguistics.M.,1972,p.367.
14. Ivanova I.P., Burlakova V.V., Pocheptsov G.G. specified work С.238.
15. Kononov A.N. Issues of further development of Trukic linguistics in the USSR.zh.soviet Trukology. Baku, 1978, No.2, p.7.
16. See: Kuchkartaev I.K.Valent analysis of speech verbs in Uzbek language. Tashkent, 1977, p.13.
17. Marx K.Kapital.t.1.1952.p. 64.
18. Ivanov.S.N. decree.work.p.20.
19. He is the same. Decree.work, p.20.
20. He also, p.22.
21. Stepanova M.D.Helbig G. specified work p.155-156.
22. Silnitskiy G.G. Verbal valence and pledge. Typology of passive constructions. Diatheses and mortgages .L.,1974, p.55.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.