Representation of Science in Two Realistic Novels of Different Cultures

Authors

  • Aziza K. Akhmedova Aziza K. Akhmedova, Candidate of PhD Author
  • Elmira D. Muratova Elmira D. Muratova, PhD, associate professor, Uzbek State World Languages University Tashkent, Uzbekistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/amfsmt89

Keywords:

character, realistic novel, fact, fiction, aesthetic ideals, intelligentsia, narration

Abstract

Given the expansion of realistic novels just before the World War II, this article analyzes the representation of science in American and Uzbek novels. A close reading of Arrow smith by Sinkler Lewis and The Three Roots by Pirimkul Kodirov shows that the authors’ approach to create realistic characters of science sphere bear similarities. A careful analysis is given to the interplay of facts and fiction in the novels, the representation of the authors’ aesthetic ideals by means of protagonists and the tools that enable the creators to achieve realistic description of characters. As a result of the comparison, the type of literary relations between the two national literatures in the mentioned period is clarified and the similarity of the two novels explained. It is concluded that similarities of the novels are both a result of mediated form of internal contact and typological affinities. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Hornby, A S. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. Oxford; Oxford University Press. 1995.

2. Hutchisson, James M. »Sinclair Lewis, Paul De Kruif, and the Composition of Arrowsmith.« Studies in the Novel, 24. 1 (Spring 1992): 48-66.

3. Doctorow E.L. (2008) “Afterword”. In: Lewis S. (1925/2008) Arrowsmith. New York: New American Library, 451-456.

4. Abrams M. H. Glossary of literary terms.Seventh edition. p. 347.

5. Lodge D. Consciousness & the Novel // Lodge D. Consciousness & the Novel. Connected Essays. L, 2001.P. 1–91.

6. Griffin, Robert J.“ Twentieth Century Interprations of Arrowsmith: A collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs New Jersey : Prentice-Hall, 1968.

7. Lewis S. Arrowsmith. New York, NY: Collier; 1925 [Google Scholar]

8. Kodirov. P. The Three Roots.—Tashkent: Uzbekistan literary press, 1958.-456 p.

9. Ferber M, Dictionary of literary terms. Cambridge University Press. 2007. P. 272.

10. Wellek R.., Warren O. The theory of literature.—M.: Progress, 1978.—328 p

11. 11.Veselovsky A.N. Historical Poetics, Moscow: Higher scool, 1989, P. 405.

12. Durisin, D. (1979). Theory of comparative literary studies. Мoscow: Progress, 320.

13. Galperin I. R., Stylistics, Moscow: Higher school 1977.328p.

14. Dima, А. (1977). Principles of comparative literary studies. Moscow: Progress, 229.

15. César Domínguez, HaunSaussy, Darío Villanueva, Introducing Comparative Literature: New Trends and Applications, Routledge, 2014 [Google Scholar]

16. Dima, Alexandru. Principysravnitel'nogoliteraturovedenija (Principles of Comparative Literature). Trans. M.W. Fridman. Moskva: Progress, 1977 https://heritage.umich.edu/stories/the-michigan-scientist-who-was-arrowsmith/

17. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/dec/06/based-on-a-true-story--geoff-dyer-fine-line-between-factand-fiction-nonfiction

Downloads

Published

30.04.2020

How to Cite

K. Akhmedova, A., & D. Muratova, E. (2020). Representation of Science in Two Realistic Novels of Different Cultures. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.61841/amfsmt89