The capacity of potential attachment is central to the formation of working alliance in Psychotherapy: A Grounded Theory

Authors

  • Fatemeh Abbasi PhD candidate of clinical psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran Author
  • Mohammad Ali Goodarzi Professor of Clinical Psychology, Department of clinical psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. Author
  • Mohammad Mazidi Associate Professor of Clinical Psychology, Department of clinical psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. Author
  • Mehdi Reza Sarafraz Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychology, Department of clinical psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/f8542k96

Keywords:

Working Alliance, Psychotherapeutic Process, Reflective Function, Attachment,, Avoidance

Abstract

 The main objective of this study was to explore the dynamics of working alliance during the prerecorded psychotherapy sessions using a grounded theory paradigm. To collect the data, fifteen psychotherapeutic pre-recorded videos were selected based on theoretical sampling procedures. Three coders were trained to extract initial open codes related to the working alliance phenomenon after they watched psychotherapeutic videos. We encoded the data in three stages of open, axial and selective coding through deductive and inductive methods. In the final stage, we used a paradigm coding strategy to develop our grounded theory of working alliance. The ground theory indicates that “reflective functioning” (causal condition), in interaction with “rapport and goal setting” (context) and “resistance” (intervening condition) “engages the client and psychotherapist in “learning process” (action/interaction strategies) which in turn activates the appropriate or non-appropriate patterns of attachment of both client and psychotherapist. These interactions, in turn, exert its direct influence on the formation or disruption of working alliance (consequences). These five elements are involved in the formation of working alliance during any type of psychotherapy regardless of the psychotherapy approach and the capacity of potential attachment is central to the model. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2016). Mentalization-based treatment for personality disorders: a practical guide.

Oxford University Press, 10-11.

[2] Benz, C. R., Ridenour, C. S., & Newman, I. (2008). Mixed methods research: Exploring the interactive

continuum. SIU Press.

[3] Bohart, A. C., & Wade, A. G. (2013). The client in psychotherapy. Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of

Psychotherapy and Behavior Change, 6, 219-257.

[4] Boritz, T. Z., Bryntwick, E., Angus, L., Greenberg, L. S., & Constantino, M. J. (2014). Narrative and emotion

process in psychotherapy: An empirical test of the Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System

(NEPCS). Psychotherapy Research, 24(5), 594-607.

[5] CASTONGUAY, L. G., & BEUTLER, L. E. (Eds.). (2006). Principles of therapeutic change that work. New

York: Oxford University Press.

[6] Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory as an emergent method. Handbook of emergent methods, 155, 172.

[7] Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs:

Selection and implementation. The counseling psychologist, 35(2), 236-264.

[8] Dimaggio, G., & Lysaker, P. H. (2015). Metacognition and mentalizing in the psychotherapy of patients with

psychosis and personality disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71(2), 117-124.

[9]

[10] Ekamparam, G. (2008). Insecure attachment and the therapeutic relationship: relational dynamics between

therapist and addicts in psychotherapy (Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology).

[11] Farber, B. A., & Metzger, J. A. (2009). The therapist as secure base. Attachment Theory and Research in

Clinical Work with Adults, 46-70.

[12] Fertuck, E. A., Mergenthaler, E., Target, M., Levy, K. N., & Clarkin, J. F. (2012). Development and criterion

validity of a computerized text analysis measure of reflective functioning. Psychotherapy Research, 22(3), 298-

305.

[13] Fonagy, P., Steele, M., Steele, H., Moran, G. S., & Higgitt, A. C. (1991). The capacity for understanding mental

states: The reflective self in parent and child and its significance for security of attachment. Infant mental health

journal, 12(3), 201-218.

[14] Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. 1967. Weidenfield & Nicolson, London, 1-

19.

[15] GOLDFRIED, M. R. (1980). Toward the delineation of therapeutic change principles. American Psychologist,

35, 991–999.

[16] Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (Eds.). (1994). The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (Vol.

173). John Wiley & Sons, 13-15.

[17] Horvath, A. O., Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual

psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 9.

[18] HILL, C. E. (2004). Helping skills: Facilitating exploration, insight, and action (2nd ed.). Washington, DC:

American Psychological Association.

[19] Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the client-therapist bond through the lens of attachment

theory. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 45(4), 431.

[20] Ogrodniczuk, J. S., Piper, W. E., & Joyce, A. S. (2011). Effect of alexithymia on the process and outcome of

psychotherapy: A programmatic review. Psychiatry Research, 190(1), 43-48.

[21] Prochaska, J., & Norcross, J. (2013). Systems of psychotherapy: A transtheoretical analysis. Nelson Education,

11.

[22] Rameshni, M. (2017). The Relevance of Attachment Theory Principles to Psychotherapy and How It Can

Contribute to Fostering Therapeutic Alliance and The Change Process for Clients: A Literature

Review (Doctoral dissertation, City University of Seattle).

[23] Rowley, J. (2012). Conducting research interviews. Management ResearchReview, 35(3/4), 260-271..

[24] Slade, A. (2007). Parental reflective functioning: An introduction. Attachment and Human Development, 7,

269-281.

[25]

[26] Stapleton D., Pati S., Beach E. & Julmanichoti P. (2004). Activity-based costing for logistics and marketing.

Business Process Management Journal, 10(5), pp. 584-597.

[27] Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Sage Publications.

[28] Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Publications.

[29] Talia, A., Miller-Bottome, M., Katznelson, H., Pedersen, S. H., Steele, H., Schröder, P. & Lingiardi, V. (2018).

Mentalizing in the presence of another: Measuring reflective functioning and attachment in the therapy

process. Psychotherapy Research, 1-14.

[30] Yeryomenko, N. (2012). Does the depth of client experiencing predict good psychotherapy outcomes? A metaanalysis of treatment outcomes, Electronic Theses and Dissertations, University of Windsor, 3-5.

Downloads

Published

28.02.2021

How to Cite

Abbasi, F., Ali Goodarzi, M., Mazidi, M., & Reza Sarafraz, M. (2021). The capacity of potential attachment is central to the formation of working alliance in Psychotherapy: A Grounded Theory. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 25(1), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.61841/f8542k96