Role of Computational Tools in Structural Analysis and Design

Authors

  • Dr. Gottapu Santosh Kumar Department of Civil Engineering, Gayatri Vidya Parishad College of Engineering, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/c8tbyt85

Keywords:

Computational Tools, Structural Analysis, Design Innovation, Engineering Efficiency

Abstract

The rapid advancement of computational tools has revolutionized the field of structural analysis and design, offering new possibilities and efficiencies beyond traditional methodologies. This research explores the pivotal role that these tools play in shaping modern engineering practices. The paper begins with a historical context, highlighting the evolution of structural analysis and design and the limitations of conventional approaches. A comprehensive literature review establishes the foundation for understanding the development and integration of computational tools in structural engineering. The methodology section details the specific tools and techniques employed in the research, emphasizing their relevance and effectiveness. The paper delves into the importance of computational tools, discussing their advantages over traditional methods and showcasing real-world applications through insightful case studies. Additionally, it addresses challenges and limitations, offering a nuanced perspective on the current state of the field. The discussion extends to recent innovations and emerging trends, providing a forward-looking view into the future of computational tools in structural engineering. The paper concludes with a summary of key findings and recommendations for practitioners, researchers, and policymakers. By examining the past, present, and potential future of computational tools in structural analysis and design, this research contributes to the ongoing dialogue surrounding the optimization and evolution of engineering practices in the digital age. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. S. C. Booth, A. M. Weljie, and R. J. Turner, “COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR THE SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF METABOLOMICS EXPERIMENTS,” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, p.e201301003, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.5936/csbj.201301003.

2. M. Martinez, “FROM PLANT GENOMES TO PROTEIN FAMILIES: COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS,” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, vol. 8, no. 10, p. e201307001, Jul. 2013, doi:10.5936/csbj.201307001.

3. B. Sommer, “MEMBRANE PACKING PROBLEMS: A SHORT REVIEW ON COMPUTATIONAL MEMBRANE MODELING METHODS AND TOOLS,” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, p.e201302014, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.5936/csbj.201302014.

4. M. Widmann, J. Pleiss, and A. K. Samland, “COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR RATIONAL PROTEIN ENGINEERING OF ALDOLASES,” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, p. e201209016, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.5936/csbj.201209016.

5. M. Audagnotto and M. Dal Peraro, “Protein post-translational modifications: In silico prediction tools and molecular modeling,” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, vol. 15, pp. 307–319, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2017.03.004.

6. R. Verma, U. Schwaneberg, and D. Roccatano, “COMPUTER-AIDED PROTEIN DIRECTED EVOLUTION: A REVIEW OF WEB SERVERS, DATABASES AND OTHER COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR PROTEIN ENGINEERING,” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, p. e201209008, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.5936/csbj.201209008.

7. T. K. Guha, A. Wai, and G. Hausner, “Programmable Genome Editing Tools and their Regulation for Efficient Genome Engineering,” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, vol. 15, pp. 146–160, 2017, doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2016.12.006.

8. H. N. B. Moseley, “ERROR ANALYSIS AND PROPAGATION IN METABOLOMICS DATA ANALYSIS,” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, p. e201301006, Jan. 2013, doi:10.5936/csbj.201301006.

9. O. Pelekh, “STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL-TEMPOLOGICAL ANALYTICS,” Agrosvit, no. 24, p. 66, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.32702/2306-6792.2019.24.66.

10. Namdar, “Failure analysis of concrete frame - A numerical analysis,” Procedia Structural Integrity, vol. 2, pp. 2796–2802, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.350.

Downloads

Published

29.02.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 1 (2020): 24 (1) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Santosh Kumar, G. (2020). Role of Computational Tools in Structural Analysis and Design. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 10090-10097. https://doi.org/10.61841/c8tbyt85