Mitigating Power Quality Issues: A Study on STATCOM and UPQC with Enhanced Control Methods

Authors

  • Dr. Narendra Kumar Yegireddy Professor, EEE department, Lendi Institute of Engineering and technology, Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh, India Author
  • Dr. Gottapu Santosh Kumar Department of Civil Engineering, Gayatri Vidya Parishad College of Engineering, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India Author
  • Dr. M N V S S Kumar Associate Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Aditya Institute of Technology and Management, Tekkali, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India Author
  • Budumuru Rajesh Professor, Department of MBA, Aditya Institute of Technology and Management, K.Kotturu, Tekkali, Andhra Pradesh, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/ywe89f71

Keywords:

STATCOM, UPQC, Hysteresis Controller, PI Controller

Abstract

In both commercial and industrial settings, power systems incorporate a diverse array of electrical, electronic, and power electronic equipment. The quality of electrical power in such systems can be significantly impacted by various factors, including harmonic distortion stemming from non-linear loads like thyristor power converters and rectifiers. Additionally, issues like voltage and current flickering due to equipment such as arc furnaces, as well as voltage sag and swell caused by switching loads, can adversely affect the reliable supply of power to sensitive loads. To address these challenges, the Unified Power Quality Conditioner (UPQC) emerges as a custom power device. It comprises shunt and series converters connected in a back-to-back configuration on the DC side, effectively addressing load current and supply-voltage imperfections. The performance of a UPQC system critically hinges on the accuracy and rapidity with which reference signals are derived. In this paper, we present a designed UPQC model featuring a DC link for shunt and series compensation. This design offers the advantage of reducing the likelihood of simultaneous converter malfunction. To optimize UPQC operation, distinct control strategies are developed for the shunt and series converters. The shunt compensation and series compensation within the UPQC model are each realized through the implementation of distinct control methods. Specifically, we employ a Proportional-Integral (PI) controller for shunt compensation, while a hysteresis controller is utilized for series compensation. The hysteresis current control strategy is tailored to maintain harmonic levels below 5 percent, thereby ensuring improved power quality and the reliable operation of sensitive equipment in commercial and industrial settings. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Vadirajacharya G. Kinhal, Promod Agarwal, and Hari Oam Gupta (2011), Senior Member, IEEE “Performance Investigation of Neural-Network- Based Unified Power-Quality Conditioner” ieee transactions on power delivery, vol.26.

2. Ahmet Teke, Lütfü Saribulut, and Mehmet Tümay (2011) “A Novel Reference Signal Generation Method for PowerQuality Improvement of Unified Power-Quality Conditioner” ieee transactions on power delivery.

3. L. H. Tey, P. L. So, and Y. C. Chu (2004), “Unified power quality conditioner for improving power quality using ANN with hysteresis control,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Power System Technology, pp. 1441–1446.

4. Dinesh, L., Sesham, H., & Manoj, V. (2012, December). Simulation of D-Statcom with hysteresis current controller for harmonic reduction. In 2012 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical Engineering and Energy Management (ICETEEEM) (pp. 104-108). IEEE.

5. V. B. Venkateswaran and V. Manoj, "State estimation of power system containing FACTS Controller and PMU," 2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO), 2015, pp. 1-6, doi:10.1109/ISCO.2015.7282281

6. Ruiye Liu, Ning Xia, Xiaonan Wang” The Research on Fuzzy-PID Control in Unified Power Quality Conditioner”.

7. Timothy Ross J. (1995), “Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications”, McGraw-Hillbook Company; University of Mexico.

8. Manohar, K., Durga, B., Manoj, V., & Chaitanya, D. K. (2011). Design Of Fuzzy Logic Controller In DC Link To Reduce Switching Losses In VSC Using MATLAB-SIMULINK. Journal Of Research in Recent Trends.

9. Manoj, V., Manohar, K., & Prasad, B. D. (2012). Reduction of switching losses in VSC using DC link fuzzy logic controller Innovative Systems Design and Engineering ISSN, 2222-1727.

10. Dinesh, L., Harish, S., & Manoj, V. (2015). Simulation of UPQC-IG with adaptive neuro fuzzy controller (ANFIS) for power quality improvement. Int J Electr Eng, 10, 249-268

11. HUANG Min, ZHA Xiao-ming, CHEN Yun-ping (2002), The controller of fuzzy changing structure of parallel power quality conditioner[J]. Power System Technology,26(7):11-14.

12. J. Schindall, “The Charge of the Ultra-Capacitors,” IEEE Spectrum, vol.44, no. 11, pp. 42-46, Nov. 2007.

13. Zouidi, F. Fnaiech, and K. AL-Haddad (2006), “Neural network controlled three-phase three-wire shunt active power filter,” in Proc. IEEE ISIE, Montreal, QC, Canada, Jul. 9–12,pp. 5–10.

Downloads

Published

29.02.2020

How to Cite

Kumar Yegireddy, N., Santosh Kumar, G., Kumar, M. N. V. S. S., & Rajesh, B. (2020). Mitigating Power Quality Issues: A Study on STATCOM and UPQC with Enhanced Control Methods. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 10081-10089. https://doi.org/10.61841/ywe89f71