Agronomic Responses on plant population and corn Maize (zea may L.) Hybrids
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/atz14721Keywords:
corn, Maize, Agronomic, Hybrids, plant populationAbstract
The impacts of plant thickness on plant stature, ear tallness, tail distance across, dwelling, corn grain yield, test weight, and photograph artificially dynamic radiation (PAR) were considered in 2016 and 2017 under downpours that took care of conditions in focal Louisiana. The consequences of these examinations were utilized to decide the impacts of plant thickness levels on plant tallness, ear stature, tail width, dwelling, corn grain yield, test weight, and PAR. The two years saw better than expected precipitation and below-normal temperatures during the developing season. Plant populace development prompted an expansion in grain yields, which showed a cross-breed reaction in one of two years (fixed ear more noteworthy than semiflex ear). The decent ear half breed had lower test loads, and the impact of plant populations was conflicting, with expanded populations prompting more prominent test weight in both of two years. The decent ear cross breed brought about an expansion in housing in one of the two years it was utilized. For ear stature and seed weight, there was a cross-breed by-populace collaboration between the two populaces. Because of higher populations, corn yields might be affected by the hereditary inclination of corn cross breeds (regardless of their regenerative versatility) to endure different natural circumstances and stresses related to higher populations
Downloads
References
1. USAID. Micronutrient Programs and DSM Nutritional Products.
Fortification Basics. Maize flour/Meal; 2002. Available
online: https://www.dsm.com/en_US/nip/public/home/downloads/Corn.p
df (accessed on 22 December 2013).
2. Ranum, P.; Peña-Rosas, J.P.; Garcia-Casal, M.N. Global maize production,
utilization, and consumption. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2014, 1312, 105–112.
3. Undie, U.L.; Uwah, D.F.; Attoe, E.E. Effect of intercropping and crop
arrangement of yield and productivity of late season maize/soybean
mixtures in the humid environment of South Southern Nigeria. J. Agric.
Sci. 2012, 4, 37–50.
4. Evans, L.T.; Fischer, R.A. Yield pot ential: Its definition, measurement and
significance. Crop Sci. 1999, 39, 1544–1551.
5. Benson, T.; Fermont, A. Estimating yield of food crops grown by
smallholder farmers: A review in the Uganda context. In International
Food Policy Research Institute; IFPRI Discussion Paper 01097;
Development Strategy and Governance Division: Washington, DC, USA,
2011; p. 69.
6. Jocković, Đ.; Stojaković, M.; Ivanović, M.; Bekavac, G.; Popov, R.;
Đalović, I. NS maize hybrids—Today and tomorrow. Ratar.
Povrt. 2010, 47, 325–333.
7. Đalović, I. More Important Morphological Traits and the Content of
Mineral Elements in Maize at the Different Levels of Fertilization (In
Serbian). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Agriculture,
Novi Sad, Serbi, 2014.
8. Van Ittersum, M.K.; Rabbinge, R. Concepts in production ecology for
analysis and quantification of agricultural input -output combinations. Field
Crops Res. 1997, 52, 197–208.
9. Liu, Z.; Yang, X.; Lin, X.; Hubbard, K.G.; Lv, S.; Wang, J. Narrowing the
agronomic yield gaps of maize by improved soil, cultivar, and agricultural
management practices in different climate zones of Northeast China. Earth
Interact. 2016, 20, 1–18.
10.Ndhleve, S.; Nakin, M.D.V.; Longo-Mbenza, B. Impact of supplemental
irrigation as a climate change adaptation strategy for maize production: A
case of the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Water SA 2017, 43,
222–228.
11.Sud, U.C.; Ahmad, T.; Gupta, V.K.; Chandra, H.; Sahoo, P.M.; Aditya, K.;
Singh, M.; Biswas, A. Global Strategy. In Synthesis of Literature and
Framework—Research on Improving Methods for Estimating Crop Area,
Yield and Production under Mixed, Repeated and Continuous Cropping ;
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute: New Delhi, India,
2016; p. 127.
12.Fermont, A.; Benson, T. Estimating Yield of Food Crops Grown by
Smallholder Farmers: A Review in the Uganda Context ; International Food
Policy Research Institute/CGIAR: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; p. 68.
13.Ali, F.; Ahsan, M.; Ali, Q.; Kanwal, N. Phenotypic stability of Zea mays
grain yield and its attributing traits under drought stress. Front. Plant.
Sci. 2017, 8, 1397.
14.Muranui, E. Effect of plant density and row spacing on maize ( Zea
mays L.) grain yield in different crop year. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2015, 2,
57–63.
15.Huang, S.; Gao, Y.; Li, Y.; Xu, L.; Tao, H.; Wang, P. Influence of plant
architecture on maize physiology and yield in the Heilonggang River
Valley. Crop J. 2017, 5, 52–62.
16.Vazin, F.; Hassanzadeh, M.; Madani, A.; Nassiri -Mahallati, M.; Nasri, M.
Modeling light interception and distribution in mixed canopy of common
cocklebur (Xanthium stramarium) in competition with corn. Planta
Daninha 2010, 28, 455–462.
17.Andrade, F.H.; Vega, C.; Uhart, S.; Cirilo, A.; Cantarero, M.; Valentinuz,
O. Kernel number determination in maize. Crop Sci. 1999, 39, 453–459.
18.Russell, W.A. Genetic improvement of maize yields. Adv. Agron. 1991, 46,
245–298.
19.Qian, C.; Yu, Y.; Gong, X.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, Z.; Hao, Y.; Li, L.;
Song, Z.; Zhang, W. Response of grain yield to plant density and nitrogen
rate in spring maize hybrids released from 1970 to 2010 in Northeast
China. Crop J. 2016, 4, 459–467.
20.Mandić, V.; Bijelić, Z.; Krnjaja, V.; Tomić, Z.; Stanojković -Sebić, A.;
Stanojković, A.; CaroPetrović, V. The effect of crop density on maize grain
yield. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb. 2016, 32, 83–90.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
