A Case Study on Democratic Thought and Administrative Law

Authors

  • Amandeep Kaur Guru Kashi University, Talwandi Sabo Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/hf2y8d94

Keywords:

Democratic Thought, Administrative Law, Civic Republicanism.

Abstract

Obliging The Enormous Abilities Of Selected Workplaces With Our Obligation In Regards To Governance By Everyone Is A Driving Forward Test For The Indian Administrative State. Various Aspects Of Contemporary Administrative Law Have Been Protected, At Least In Part, As Hopes To Square The Substances Of Office Control With Our Law-Based Liabilities, Ranging From The Right To Examine Organization Structures To The Explanation Giving Requirements On Workplaces To The Official Study Of Manage Making. A Theory Of Bigger Part Led Framework, Whether Fully Stated Or Freshly Acquired, Is At The Foundation Of Each Such Effort: Some Beginning Of What Vote Based Framework Is About, And What Vote Based Framework Demands.

While A Few Starts Of A Larger Part Running Framework Have Influenced Administrative Law Over Time, Administrative Law Has Never Managed A Strand of Vote-Based Control That I Can Articulate. Evenhanded Minimalists Argue That Traditional Theories of Majority Lead Framework Set Unrealistic Expectations For Evaluating Government Sharpens Because They Expect More From Citizens, Trailblazers, And Foundations Than Is Practical. Minimalists Aim To Provide A Less Yearning, More Practical Record Of Notoriety-Based Management That Nonetheless Finds A Space For Regularizing Liabilities In This Way. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. For a chronological overview, see European Parliament (2017): Shrinking space for

civil society: the EU response. Available here.

2. See: Bermeo, Nancy (2016): On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27

(1), 5-19; and Levitsky, Steven & Ziblatt, Daniel (2018): How Democracies Die. Crown

Publishing, New York.

3. Diamond, Larry (2008): The Democratic Rollback. The Resurgence of the Predatory

State. Foreign Affairs, 87 (2), 36–48.

4. Gat, Azar (2007): The Return of Authoritarian Great Powers. Foreign Affairs, 86 (4),

59-69

5. Lührmann, A. & Lindberg, S. (2019): a third wave of autocratization is here: what is

new about it? Democratization 26:7. Available here

6. Braun, F., Brechenmacher, S., Carothers, T. (2020): How will the Coronavirus

Reshape Democracy and Governance Globally. Available here.

7. Applebaum, A. (2020): The People in Charge See an Opportunity. The Atlantic.

Available here.

8. James, T. (2020): Should electios be postponed because of coronavirus? The

Conversation. Available here.

9. International IDEA (2020): Global overview of COVID-19: impact on elections.

Available here.

10. Alon, T., Doepke, M., Olmstead-Rumsey, .J. Tertilt, M. (2020): The impact of the

coronavirus pandemic on gender equality. Vox EU. Available here.

11. Zala, E. (2020): Women hit hardest by corona economic crisis. EU Observer.

Available here.

12. Braun, F., Brechenmacher, S., Carothers, T. (2020): How will the Coronavirus

Reshape Democracy and Governance Globally Available Here.

13. Civics (2017): State of civil society report Available here.

14. Country case studies were conducted in Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Georgia,

Indonesia, Kenya and Zimbabwe.

15. Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy (2017): research methodology on

closing democratic space.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2021

How to Cite

Kaur, A. (2021). A Case Study on Democratic Thought and Administrative Law. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 25(3), 1010-1017. https://doi.org/10.61841/hf2y8d94