The Influence of Group Cohesiveness on the Intentions of Spreading Fake News (Hoax) on Adulthood in Three Cities in West Java

Authors

  • Wina Lova Riza Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang Author
  • Lania Muharsih Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang Author
  • Heri Heryono Widyatama University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/mp4h1r26

Keywords:

Group Cohesiveness, Hoaxes, Adulthood

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether or not the influence of group cohesiveness on the intentions of spreading hoax in West Java. The method used in this study carried out a quantitative method, the sample used in this study were 245 people drawn from the order of the top cities in the use of social media in West Java. The technique used for sampling in this study is snowball sampling, data collection using a Likert type scale that is the scale of group cohesiveness and the scale of the intention to spread the hoax issue. The analysis in this study uses a simple linear regression analysis to determine the effect of group cohesiveness (X) on the intentions of spreading hoax (Y). Based on the results of data analysis shows that there is a strong influence of group cohesiveness on the intention of spreading hoaxes in West Java with the acquisition value of F = 166.014 with a significance of 0,000 less than 0.05 (p <0.05) which means, the higher the cohesiveness of the group the higher also the intention of the spread of hoax that occurred in West Java. The rate of the Cohesiveness value of 63.7% so that it can be interpreted that 36.3% of the occurrence of the intentions of the spread of hoax is influenced by other factors. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A.S, M. (2011). Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi. Depok: Universitas Indonesia.

[2] Abdillah, F. (2012). hubungan kohesivitas kelompok dengan intensi turnover pada karyawan. Journal of sosial

and industrial psychology, 52-58.

[3] Ajzen, I. &. (2009). Belief, attitude, Intention and behavior. Introduction to theory and research, 129-385.

[4] Andrean, K. M., & Heinlein, M. (2010). User of the world, unite! the challenge and opportunities of sosial media.

Business Horisons, 61.

[5] Azwar. (2011). Reabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

[6] Azwar, S. (2018). Metode Penelitian Psikologi Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

[7] Azwar, S. (2018). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

[8] Biantoro, B. (2016, 2018 14). Bahaya mengintai dari kabar Hoax di dunia maya. Retrieved from merdeka.com:

https://www.merdeka.com/teknologi/4-bahaya-mengintai-dari-kabar-Hoax-

[9] Carron, A. V, Bray, S. R, dan Eys, M. (2009). Team cohesion and Team Succes in sport: Journal of sport science.

No. 20, 119-126

[10] Carles, S. A & De Paola, S. (2010). The Measurement of Cohesion In Work Teams. Small Group Research. Vol.

31 (1), 71-88

[11] Djuraid. 2009. Panduan Menulis Berita. Malang: UMM Press

[12] Danelson, F. (2006). Group Dinamic Fourth Edision. united states of america: Wadsworth Thomson Higher

Education.

[13] E Shelley taylor, L. A. (2009). Psikologi sosial edisi kedua belas. jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

[14] Forsyth, D. R. (2010). Group Dinamic. USA: Wadsworth Learning

[15] Hartinah, S. 2009. Konsep Dasar Bimbingan kelompok. Bandung: PT Refika aditama

[16] Ivancevich, John M, Konopaske Robert & Matteson Michael T 2009, Perilaku dan managemen organisasi

(alih bahasa Gina Gania), edisi tujuh, Erlangga, Jakarta

[17] Lattimore. (2010). Publik Relation: Profesi dan Praktik. Jakarta: Humanika.

[18] Lemme, B. H. (1995). Development in Adulthood. united states of america: Allyn & Bacon.

[19] Lindsay, E. a. (2008). The Management and Control of Quality (7th edition). Ohio: Thomson South Western.

[20] Meike, Y. (2012). Hubungan Intensitas Mengakses Sosial Media Terhadap perilaku belajar mata pelajaran

produktif pada siswa kelas XI Jasa Boga di SMKN 3 Klaten. Akses Media Online , 35-39.

[21] Mcshane, Steven L. & Von Glinow, Mary Ann.(2008). Organizational Behavior. Fourth edition.

McGRAW –Hill International, United States Of America

[22] Myers, David G. (2012). Psikologi Sosial jilid 2. Jakarta: SalembaHumanika

[23] Nasrullah, R. (2015). Media Sosial Perspektif Komunikasi. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

[24] Prasetyo, H. (2017, desember 15). Darurat Hoax Bukan sekedar Hoax. Retrieved from intisari.com: https://intisarionline.com/index.php/Techno/Technology/Darurat-Hoax-Bukan-Sekadar-Hoax

[25] R.A, B. D. (2005). Psikologi sosial edisi ke sepuluh. jakarta : erlangga.

[26] Respati, s. (2017, desember selasa). mengapa orang mudah mempercayai berita "HOAX" ? Retrieved from

kompas: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/01/23/18181951/mengapa.banyak.orang.mudah.percaya.berita.Hoax.

[27] Stephen Robbins, J. T. (2008). perilaku organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

[28] Sugiyono, P. D. (2016). Metode penelitian. bandung: alfabeta.

[29] Sugiyono. 2014. metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan Research and Development. Bandung: Alfabeta

[30] Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

[31] Sujarweni, W. V. (2014). Metode Penelitian: Lengkap, Praktis, dan Mudah dipahami. Jogjakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.

[32] Sulistyo, B. (2006). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Wedatama Widya Sastra dan Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya Universitas Indonesia.

[33] Syamsul, A. (2009). Dasar-Dasar Siaran Radio. Bandung: Nuansa.

Downloads

Published

29.02.2020

How to Cite

Lova Riza, W., Muharsih, L., & Heryono, H. (2020). The Influence of Group Cohesiveness on the Intentions of Spreading Fake News (Hoax) on Adulthood in Three Cities in West Java. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 8814-8821. https://doi.org/10.61841/mp4h1r26