LIBRARY USERS' SATISFACTION ANALYSIS USING SERVQUAL AND ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/t7hzt706Keywords:
Libraries, Servqual, Analytic Network Proces, user satisfactionAbstract
This research was conducted at Library of University of Buana Perjuangan Karawang. The purpose of this study isto measure and analyze the level of satisfaction of library users with Servqual approach and prioritize the improvements that can be done by weighting of the criteria with ANP methode. The method used is the fivedimensional approach Servqual and weighting criteria with ANP. The conclusion shows that the average score for the criteria of reality is quite good (fairly satisfied) with the existing services at the Library of UBP Karawang, with an average score above 3, except for the criterion R4 (speed of turnitin service) average scores below 3 is 2.97, but because of the average expectation as well is not very high at 3.41 so that its gap is smaller than the gap between the expectations with the reality on the criteria E1 (the friendliness of the staff of the library) and E2 (the library staff willing to respond to complaints that exists). Except that, it was found that the three criteria of ranking the priority that should be the corrective action is E1 (the friendliness of the staff of the library), E2 (the library staff is willing to respond to complaints that exists), and T7 (a clear order information) with each of the priority value of 0.31; 0.31; and 0.27.
Downloads
References
[1] Endri 2009, Permasalahan Pengembangan Sukuk di Indonesia Menggunakan Metode ANP. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, ABFI Institut Perbanas Jakarta.
[2] Dewayana, Triwulandari S dan Ahmad Budi 2009, Pemilihan Pemosok Cooper Rod Menggunakan Metode ANP (Studi Kasus: PT. Olex Cables Indonesia). Jurnal TI Undip Vol IV, No 3, September 2009
[3] Kasirian, M.D. & R.D. Yusuff 2009, Determining Interdependencies Among Supplier Selection Criteria. European Journal of Scientific Research Vol.35 No.1, pp.76-84
[4] Kotler, Philip, 2003, Marketing Management, 11th Edition.Prentice Hall.Inc. New Jersey. Hal 85.
[5] Lee, Ming-Chang 2010, The Analytic Hierarchy and the Network Process in Multicriteria Decision Making: Performance Evaluation and Selecting Key Performance Indicators Based on ANP Model. Department of Information Management, Fooyin University Department of Business Administration, National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, Taiwan
[6] Moenir, A.S, 2010, Manajemen Pelayanan Umum Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
[7] Saaty, Thomas L 1999. Fundamentals of The Analytic Network Process. University of Pittsburgh
[8] Sipahi, S.& Timor, M 2010, The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications. Management Decision. Vol. 48 No. 5, pp. 775-808
[9] Tjiptono, Fandy, 2011, Strategi Pemasaran. Edisi 3. Yogyakarta: ANDI
[10] Zeithaml, Parasuraman, and Leonard L. Berry, 1988, SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing. Vol 64 (1) pp 12-37
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
