TEACHER’S ATTITUDE TOWARDS CREATIVE TEACHING STRATEGIES FOR ENHANCING STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AT HIGHER SECONDARY LEVEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/9w1rsw23Keywords:
Creative teaching, Teaching Strategies, student achievementAbstract
In this paper the investigator to explicit the creative teaching strategies for enhancing the students’ academic achievement at the higher secondary level. The Innovativeness is a different reasoning capacity that performs on the familiarity, adaptability, and uniqueness of speculation, affectability to issues, and reclassifies and fines existing thoughts. To find out teacher’s attitudes towards creative teaching strategies for enhancing students’ academic achievement at the higher secondary level. The investigator adopted the Survey method of Research. The investigator is consulted with his guide prepared a questionnaire consisting of 25 questions. To establish the content validity their liability value is 0.69. The population for survey research for the present study constitutes about 145 teachers of both higher secondary schools of Sivaganga District. Adequate creative teaching aids, textbooks, should be provided in every school. Creative, learning activity of teachers will help them to update their knowledge. The findings of the study the Null hypothesis is accepted to the attitude of the urban school teachers and rural school teachers both are not significant.
Downloads
References
1. Amabile, T.M. (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in
OrganizationalBehaviour, 10, 123–167.
2. Babu, R.U.M., Kalaiyarasan,G.(2019). Brain Based Strategies for Learning. Department of
Education,Alagappa University, Karaikudi. 7, 291-293.
3. Böckers, A., Mayer, C., &Böckers, T. M. (2014). Does learning in clinical context in anatomical sciences
improve examination results, learning motivation, or learning orientation?.Anatomical sciences education,
7(1), 3-11.
4. Collins, M.A. &Amabile, T.M. (1999) Motivation and creativity. In Handbook of Creativity (ed. by
R.J.Sternberg), pp. 297–312. Cambridge University Press, New York.
5. Esquivel, G.B. (1995) Teacher behaviours that foster creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 185–202.
6. Feist, G.J. (1999) The influence of personality on artisticand scientific creativity. In Handbook of Creativity
(ed. ByR.J. Sternberg), pp. 273–296. Cambridge University Press, New York.
7. Feldman, D.H. (1999)The development of creativity. In Handbook of Creativity (ed. by R.J. Sternberg),pp.
169–186. Cambridge University Press, New York.
8. Gardner, H. (1994) Multiple intelligence theory. In Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence (ed. by
R.J.Sternberg), pp. 740–742. Macmillan, New York.
9. Getzels, J.W. & Jackson, P.W. (1962) Creativity and Intelligence.Wiley, New York.
10. McGreevy, A. (1990) Darwin and teacher: An analysis of the mentorship between Charles Darwin and
professorJohn Henslow. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 5–9.
11. Petrowski, M.J. (2000) Creativity research: implications for teaching, learning, and thinking. Reference
ServicesReview, 28, 304–312.
12. Sheu, F. R., & Chen, N. S. (2014).Taking a signal: A review of gesture-based computing research in
education. Computers & Education, 78, 268-277.
13. Simplicio, J.S.C. (2000) Teaching classroom educators how to be more effective and creative teachers. Education, 120, 675–680.
14. Soh, K.C. (2000) Indexing creativity fostering teacher behaviour: a preliminary validation study. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 34, 118–134.
15. Sternberg, R.J. &Lubart, T.I. (1995) Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity. Free Press, New York.
16. Sternberg, R.J. &Lubart, T.I. (1999) The concept of creativity: prospects and paradigms. In Handbook of Creativity (ed. by R.J. Sternberg), pp. 3–15. Cambridge University Press, New York.
17. Sternberg, R.J. &O’hara, L.A. (1999) Creativity and intelligence. In Handbook of Creativity (ed. by R.J.Sternberg), pp. 251–272. Cambridge University Press, New York.
18. Sternberg, R.J. (ed.) (1988)The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, New York.
19. Torrance, E.P. (1987) Future career image as a predictor of creative achievement in the 22-year longitudinal study.Psychological Reports, 60, 574.
20. Udhaya Mohan Babu, R., &Kalaiyarasan, G. (2019). Impact of Visual-Spatial Skills for Long Term Memory in Secondary School Students.
21. Wang, W.C. & Cheng, Y.Y. (2000) Development and item response analysis of the creativity development inventory. Annual Journal of Test, 47, 153–173.
22. Weisberg, R.W. (1999) Creativity and knowledge: a challenge to theories. In Handbook of Creativity (ed. By R.J. Sternberg), pp. 226–250. Cambridge University Press, New York.
23. Woodman, R.W. &Schoenfeldt, L.F. (1989) Individual differences in creativity: an interactionist perspective. In Handbook of Creativity (ed. by J.A. Glover, R.R. Ronning& C.R. Reynolds), pp. 77–92. Plenum, New York.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
