THE FACTITIOUS DISORDER: THE ANALYSIS OF MUNCHAUSEN SYNDROME BY PROXY CASES FROM TURKEY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/6aftj644Keywords:
child abuse, factitious disorder, Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy, victim childAbstract
Child abuse is a vital subject matter with a broad definition ranging from neglecting a child's basic physiological and emotional needs to causing his/her death by the negligent and abusive caregiver(s). In the article, as a form of child abuse, Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy is defined, discussed, and presented with two MSBP cases selected from Turkey. The initial aim of the article is to present the cases from Turkey to analyze and investigate the reasons and consequences of MSBP as the fabricated disease and as a form of child abuse on the victims in the framework of etiology, prevalence, and prevention methods on the cases in Turkey. In addition to that, the secondary aim of the article is to elevate public awareness of the phenomenon with respect to the protection of children's rights. The perpetrators are the mother(s) of the victim children in the majority of the MSBP cases. Based on the analysis of the aforementioned cases from Turkey, the potential fatal consequences of the MSBP and the crucial role of medical staff in determining the cases and reporting them to the authorities abruptly so as to protect the children from the abuse and probable harms of the syndrome are discussed
Downloads
References
Abdulhamid, I. & Siegel, P. T. (2008). Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. eMedicine
Pediatrics: Developmental and Behavioral, 1-10Acehan, S., et al. (2013). Çocuk İstismarı ve İhmalinin Değerlendirilmesi. Arşiv Kaynak
Tarama Dergisi . Archives Medical Review Journal 2013; 22(4):591-614
Aktay, M. (2020). İstismar ve İhmalin Çocuk Üzerindeki Etkileri ve Tedavisi. Gelişim ve
Psikoloji Dergisi (GPD). 2020; 1(2):169-184
Algeri, S., et al. (2014). Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy: An Integrative Revıew. Journal
Of Nursing. J Nurs Ufpe On Line., Recife, 8(11):3983-91, Nov., 2014.Issn: 1981-8963. DOI:
10.5205/Reuol.6679-58323-1-Ed.0811201422
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
Fourth Edition. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association (1994).
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
Fifth Edition. Arlington, VA, American Psychiatric Association. (DSM-V) (2013), 324-327
Amlani, A., Grewal, G.S., & Feldman, M. D. (2016). Malingering by Proxy: A Literature
Review and Current Perspectives. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 172-176.
Artingstall, K. (1998). Practical Aspects Of Munchausen By Proxy And Munchausen
Syndrome Investigation. Routledge
Ashoor R. Sarhat et al. (2019). A Novel Case Series of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy
Victim. World Family Medicine.; 17(7): 17-21. DOI: 10.5742MEWFM.2019.93664
Başbakkal, Z. (1994). Ebeveynlerin Neden Olduğu Munchausen Sendromu. Ege Üniversitesi
Hemşirelik Yüksek Okulu Dergisi 10: 3.
Berg, B., & Jones, D. P. H. (1999) Outcome of psychiatric intervention in factitious illness by
proxy (Munchausen's syndrome by proxy). Arch Dis Child, 465–472
Bools, C.N., Neale, B.A., & Meadow, S.R. (1993). Follow-up of victims of fabricated illness
(Munchausen syndrome by Proxy). Archives of Disease in Childhood 1993; 69: 625-630.
Bursch, B. (2014). Munchausen by Proxy and Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another: Page
2 of 2. Psychiatric Times, 1-7
Byard , R. W. (2009).„„Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy‟‟: Problems And Possibilities.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol (2009) 5: 100–101. DOI 10.1007/S12024-009-9071-2
Clarke, C. And Skokauskas, N. (2010). Paediatric Symptom Falsification („Munchausen)
Syndrome By Proxy—Psychiatric Manifestations. British Journal Of Medical Practitioners,
3(4):A344.
Cömert I.T., Ugraş S., Işlek D.S., et al. (2018). A review about munchausen syndrome by
proxy: form of child abuse. Forensic Res Criminol Int J. 2018;6(2):86–88. DOI:
10.15406/frcij.2018.06.00188Davis, P., McClure, R J, Rolfe, K, Chessman, N, Pearson, S, Sibert, J R., and Meadow, R. (1998).
Procedures, placement, and risks of further abuse after Munchausen syndrome by proxy, nonaccidental poisoning, and nonaccidental suffocation. Arch Dis Child 1998;78:217–221
Demircioglu, F., Bekdasa, M., Goksugura, S. B., Cemalettin Gunes, C., & Yıldırım, O.
(2014). A Rare Reason in an Infant Who Presented With Recurrent Bleeding: Munchausen by
Proxy Syndrome. Journal of Medical Cases, Vol. 5, No. 7, pages 385-387
Faedda N, Baglioni V, Natalucci G, Ardizzone I, Camuffo M, Cerutti R and Guidetti V
(2018). Don't Judge a Book by Its Cover: Factitious Disorder Imposed on Children-Report
on 2 Cases. Front. Pediatr. 6:110. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00110
Feldman, M.D., & Hamilton, J. C. (2007). Serial factitious disorder and Munchausen by
proxy in pregnancy. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.00975.x. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Int J
Clin Pract, December 2006, 60, 12, 1675–1678
Feldman, M. D., & Brown, R. M.A. (2001). Munchausen by Proxy in an international
context. Child Abuse & Neglect 26 (2002) 509–524.
Ferrara P, Vitelli O, Romani L, Bottaro G, Ianniello F, et al. (2014). The Thin Line between
Munchausen Syndrome and Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. J Psychol Abnorm Child 3:
115. doi:10.4172/2329-9525.1000115
Filho, D. S., Kanomata, E. Y., Feldman, R. J., & Neto, A. M. (2017). Munchausen syndrome
and Munchausen syndrome by proxy: a narrative review. 516-21. DOI: 10.1590/S1679-
45082017MD3746
Goldfarb, J. (1998). A PhysicianPerspective On Dealing With Cases of Munchausen by
Proxy. Clin Pediatr. 1998; 37: 187-190.
Hamilton, J. C., & Feldman, M. D. (2016). Factitious Disorder, Munchausen Syndrome,
Munchausen by Proxy and Malingering. 1-36. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-9.00010-0
Hancı, İ.H., & Eşiyok, B. (2021). Munchausen by ProxySendromu: Vekaleten Hastalık.
Sürekl Tıp Eğitim Dergisi. 1-6. Retrieved from: https://www.ttb.org.tr/sted/sted0600/8.html
İnce, T. & Yurdakök, K. (2014). Munchausen by Proxy Sendromu; Ağır Bir Çocuk İstismarı
Formu. Türkiye Çocuk Hast Derg/Turkish J Pediatr Dis / 2014; 3: 165-170. DOI:
10.12956/tjpd.2014.78
Jung, B. & Reidenberg, M.M. (2007). Physicians Being Deceived. American Academy of
Pain Medicine, 433-537
Kara, Ö. (2010). Ankara İlinde Görev Yapan Pediatri Asistanları, Uzmanları Ve Pratisyen
Hekimlerin Çocuk İstismarı Ve İhmali Konusunda Bilgi Düzeyleri Ve Yaklaşımlarının
Karşılaştırılması. Çocuk Sağlığı Ve Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı Tıpta Uzmanlık Tezi. 1-146.Kırcı, G. S., Yurtsever, N. T., Okumuş, H., & Birincioğlu, İ. (2015). Bir “Munchausen By
Proxy” Sendromu Olgusu: Tanılamada Yaşanan Güçlükler. Turkiye Klinikleri J Foren Med
2015;12(2):51-5 doi: 10.5336/forensic.2015-44932
Kucuker H, Demir T, Oral R. Pediatric condition falsification (Munchausen syndrome by
Proxy) as a continuum of maternal factitious disorder (Munchausen syndrome). Pediatric
Diabetes 2010: 11: 572–578.
Lawlor, A.(2018). Factitious disorder and its online variant Munchausen by Internet:
understanding motivation and its impact on online users to develop a detection method. PhD
Thesis, University College Cork, 1-16
McClure, R. J., Davis, P. M., Meadow, S. R., Sibert, J. R. (1996). Epidemiology of Munchausen
syndrome by proxy, non-accidental poisoning, and non-accidental suffocation. Archives of
Disease in Childhood 1996;75:57-61
Meadow, R. (1998). Munchausen syndrome by proxy abuse perpetrated by men. Arch Dis
Child 1998;78:210–216
Millard, C. (2016). Concepts, Diagnosis and the History of Medicine: Historicising Ian
Hacking and Munchausen Syndrome. Social History of Medicine Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 567–589
Nimmo, S. B. (2015). Illness Deception. Occupational Medicine 2015;65:514–516
doi:10.1093/occmed/kqv118
Özbesler, C., Çoban, A. İ. (2010). Ebeveyn Yoluyla Munchausen Sendromu Olgularında
Sosyal Hizmetin Rolü. Aile ve Toplum Yıl: 11 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 22, sayfa 40-49, Nisan-MayısHaziran 2010. ISSN: 1303-0256.
Özdemir, D. et al. (2015). Munchausen by Proxy Syndrome: A Case Series Study from
Turkey. Journal of Family Violence. DOI 10.1007/s10896-015-9700-3
Pelendecioglu, B. & Bulut, S. (2009). Çocuğa Yönelik Aile İçi Fiziksel İstismar. Abant İzzet
Baysal Üniversitesi Dergisi Cilt:9 Sayı:1, 50-61
Perman, C. M. (1998). Diagnosing the Truth: Determining Physician Liability in Cases
Involving Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy, 54 Wash. U. J. Urb. & Contemp. L. 267.
Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_urbanlaw/vol54/iss1/13
Polat, O. (2020). Fiziksel İstismar ve Dayak. O Benim De Çocuğum Dergisi, Haziran 2020: 8-
23. Retrieved from: www.cip.org.tr
Polat, O. (2019). Tüm Boyutlarıyla Çocuk İstismarı-2 Önleme ve Rehabilitasyon. Seçkin
Yayıncılık. 274-76
Polat, O. (2018). Adli Psikolojiye Giriş. Seçkin Yayıncılık. 23-24, 51-54
Polat, O. (2015). Şiddet. Seçkin Yayıncılık. 152-154
Polat, O. (2001). Adli Tıp. Der Yayınevi. 144-190.
Rand, D.C. & Feldman, M. D. (2001). An Explanatory Model For Munchausen By Proxy Abuse. Int. J. Psychiatry In Medicine, Vol. 31(2), 113-126
Rogers, R. (2004) .Diagnostic, explanatory, and detection models of Munchausen by proxy: extrapolations from malingering and deception. Child Abuse & Neglect 28 225–239
Sanders, M.J., & Bursch, B. (2002). Forensic Assessment Of Illness Falsification, Munchausen By Proxy, And Factitious Disorder, Nos. Child Maltreatment, Vol. 7, No. 2, May 2002 112-124.
Sherr, V. T. (2005). Munchausen's syndrome by proxy and Lyme disease: medical misogyny or diagnostic mystery?. Medical Hypotheses: 1-8. Available at: http://intl.elsevierhealth.com/journals/mehy doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2005.04.009
Tiryaki, A. Y. & Baran G. (2017). Bir Çocuk İstismarı Türü Olarak “Munchausen by Proxy Sendromu”. Ankara Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, (1-2-3), 107-124.
Truman, L.T. & Ayoup, C.C. (2002). Considering Suffocatory Abuse And Munchausen By Proxy in The Evaluation Of Children Experiencing Apparent Life-Threatening Events And Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Child Maltreatment, Vol. 7, No. 2, May 2002: 138-148
Tuna, S. (2010). Aile İçi Çocuk İstismarı: Annelerin Bazı Risk Faktörleri Açısından İncelenmesi. MasterThesis. Istanbul University
Tunç, T. (2018). Münchausen by Proxy Sendromu. Retrieved from:
http://www.ankarabarosu.org.tr/siteler/ankarabarosu/hgdmakale/2018-ozel/6.pdf. Gündemi 8 Mart Kadın Özel Sayısı, 18-24 Hukuk
Türkçüer, İ., Serinken, M., Sengül, C. & Özen, M. (2010). Munchausen Sendromu mu? Yoksa Temaruz mu?. Türkiye Acil Tıp Dergisi - Turk J Emerg Med 2010;10(1):38-40
Verschuere, B., Spruyt, A., Meijer, E. H., & Otgaar, H., (2010). The Ease Of Lying. Consciousness And Cognition 20(3):908-11., Doı: 10.1016/J.Concog.2010.10.023
Vollaro, T., (1993) "Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy and its Evidentiary Problems," Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 22: Iss. 2, Article 3. Available at:
http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol22/iss2/3
Wahi, M.M, Stone, K. V., Chance, M. & Miller, C.E., (2017). Patient-Centered Medicine and Prevention of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. Intech. pages 20 - 49.http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/65814
Walk, A. E. & Davies, S. C. (2010). Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy: Identification and
Intervention. Counselor Education and Human Services Faculty Publications, 32
Walters, I. C., MacIntosh, R., & Blake, K. D. (2020). A case report and literature review: Factitious disorder imposed on another and malingering by Proxy. Paediatrics & Child Health, 2020, 345–348. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxz053
Welldon, Estela (2011) Is Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy another case of female
perversion? In: Playing with dynamite: A personal approach to the psychoanalytic
understanding of perversions, violence and criminality. The Forensic Psychotherapy
Monograph Series. Karnac, London, pp. 67-70.
World Health Organization, (1999). Child abuse and neglect by parents and other caregivers.
Chapter 3, 57-86. Retrieved from:
https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/global_campaign/en/chap3.pdf
Yates, G., & Bass, C. (2017). The perpetrators of medical child abuse (Munchausen
Syndrome by Proxy) – A systematic review of 796 cases. Child Abuse & Neglect 72: 45–53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.07.008
Yenidünya, M., et al. (2008). Munchausen Sendromu Tanısında Patolojik Değerlendirmenin
Önemi. Yeni Tıp Dergisi 2008;25: 93-96
Yorker, B. C. (1995). Covert Video Surveillance of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy: The
Exigent Circumstances Exception, 5 Health Matrix 325, Available at:
https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/healthmatrix/vol5/iss2/6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Oğuz Polat, Ayşe Akpınar, Osman Önal (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
