ENDODONTIC SEALERS WITH ANTIBIOFILM PROPERTIES - A REVIEW

Kavya Shree M.; Jayalakshmi; Balaji Ganesh S; Leslie Rani.S

doi:10.61841/3x8dkg25

Authors

Kavya Shree M. Saveetha dental college, Saveetha Institute of Medical And Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India Author
Jayalakshmi Department of Dental material, Saveetha dental college, Saveetha Institute of Medical And Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil nadu, India Author
Balaji Ganesh S Scientist, White Lab-Material Research Centre Saveetha Institute of Medical And Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil nadu, India Author
Leslie Rani.S Lecturer, Department of General Pathology, Saveetha dental college, Saveetha Institute of Medical And Technical Sciences, Chennai Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/3x8dkg25

Keywords:

Root canal sealer, antimicrobial, biofilm, root canal, microorganisms

Abstract

Oral bacteria have evolved to form biofilms on hard tooth surfaces and dental materials. Dental materials used in root canal treatment have undergone substantial improvements over the past decade. However, in one place that still has the ability of passage fillings to effectively entomb, kill bacteria, and stop the formation of a biofilm, all of which will prevent reinfection of the root canal system. The most important work of the sealer is to seal the root canal system by removing the remaining bacteria and filling of inaccessible areas of prepared canals. Sealer selection may influence the outcome of endodontic treatment endodontics, root canal sealers is from observations of bases and liners containing the material and their antibacterial and tissue repair abilities. There are three types of endodontic sealers Group 1: Zinc oxide eugenol-based sealers, for example, DSI Zoer, Tubli-Seal. Group2: Calcium Hydroxide based sealers, for example, Sealpex, Group 3: Resin-based sealers, for example, AH26, AH Plus, Diaket, in order to enhance the antimicrobial properties of sealer, nanoparticle has been incorporated into the sealers. It can reduce the microorganism's growth in the canal. The aim of this review article is to convey which endodontic sealer has good antibacterial effect and which has least antibacterial effect, so several articles have been collected and analyzed and concluded.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Beyth N, Shvero DK, Zaltsman N, Houri-Haddad Y, Abramovitz I, Davidi MP, et al. Rapid Kill—Novel Endodontic Sealer and Enterococcus faecalis. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e78586. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078586.

[2] Janani K, Palanivelu A, Sandhya R. Diagnostic accuracy of dental pulse oximeter with customized sensor holder, thermal test and electric pulp test for the evaluation of pulp vitality - An in vivo study. Brazilian Dental Science 2020;23. https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2020.v23i1.1805.

[3] Upadya MH, Kishen A. Influence of bacterial growth modes on the susceptibility to light-activated disinfection. International Endodontic Journal 2010;43:978–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01717.x.

[4] Gagliani MM, Gorni FGM, Strohmenger L. Periapical resurgery versus periapical surgery: a 5-year longitudinal comparison. International Endodontic Journal 2005;38:320–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00950.x.

[5] Hancock HH, Sigurdsson A, Trope M, Moiseiwitsch J. Bacteria isolated after unsuccessful endodontic treatment in a North American population. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 2001;91:579–86. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.113587.

[6] Kapralos V, Koutroulis A, Ørstavik D, Sunde PT, Rukke HV. Antibacterial Activity of Endodontic Sealers against Planktonic Bacteria and Bacteria in Biofilms. J Endod 2018;44:149–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.023.

[7] Ramamoorthi S, Nivedhitha MS, Divyanand MJ. Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain after using endodontic needle and EndoActivator during root canal irrigation: A randomised controlled trial. Aust Endod J 2015;41:78–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12076.

[8] Paz LEC de, de Paz LEC, Marsh PD. Ecology and Physiology of Root Canal Microbial Biofilm Communities. Springer Series on Biofilms 2015:3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47415-0_1.

[9] Ricucci D, Siqueira JF, Bate AL, Pitt Ford TR. Histologic Investigation of Root Canal–treated Teeth with Apical Periodontitis: A Retrospective Study from Twenty-four Patients. Journal of Endodontics 2009;35:493–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.014.

[10] Grönholm L, Lemberg KK, Tjäderhane L, Lauhio A, Lindqvist C, Rautemaa-Richardson R. The role of unfinished root canal treatment in odontogenic maxillofacial infections requiring hospital care. Clinical Oral Investigations 2013;17:113–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0710-8.

[11] Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu L-S, Loushine BA, Weller RN, Loushine RJ, et al. Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2011;37:895–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.04.002.

[12] Kayaoglu G, Erten H, Alaçam T, Ørstavik D. Short-term antibacterial activity of root canal sealers towards Enterococcus faecalis. International Endodontic Journal 2005;38:483–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00981.x.

[13] Ramesh S, Teja K, Priya V. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-3 gene expression in inflammation: A molecular study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry 2018;21:592. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_154_18.

[14] Kim YK, Grandini S, Ames JM, Gu L-S, Kim SK, Pashley DH, et al. Critical Review on Methacrylate Resin– based Root Canal Sealers. Journal of Endodontics 2010;36:383–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.023.

[15] Bodrumlu E, Semiz M. Antibacterial activity of a new endodontic sealer against Enterococcus faecalis. J Can Dent Assoc 2006;72:637.

[16] Siqueirajr J, Favieri A, Gahyva S, Moraes S, Lima K, Lopes H. Antimicrobial Activity and Flow Rate of Newer and Established Root Canal Sealers. Journal of Endodontics 2000;26:274–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200005000-00005.

[17] Siddique R, Sureshbabu NM, Somasundaram J, Jacob B, Selvam D. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of precipitate formation following interaction of chlorhexidine with sodium hypochlorite, neem, and tulsi. J Conserv Dent 2019;22:40–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_284_18.

[18] Noor SSSE, S Syed Shihaab, Pradeep. Chlorhexidine: Its properties and effects. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2016;9:1755. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2016.00353.x.

[19] Neff T, Layman D, Jeansonne BG. In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of endodontic sealers exposed to heat before assay. J Endod 2002;28:811–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200212000-00005.

[20] Duarte MAH, Ordinola-Zapata R, Bernardes RA, Bramante CM, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, et al. Influence of calcium hydroxide association on the physical properties of AH Plus. J Endod 2010;36:1048–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.007.

[21] R R, Rajakeerthi R, Ms N. Natural Product as the Storage medium for an avulsed tooth – A Systematic Review. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 2019;22:249–56. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.525182.

[22] Rajendran R, Kunjusankaran RN, Sandhya R, Anilkumar A, Santhosh R, Patil SR. Comparative Evaluation of Remineralizing Potential of a Paste Containing Bioactive Glass and a Topical Cream Containing Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate: An in Vitro Study. Pesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria EClínica Integrada 2019;19:1–10. https://doi.org/10.4034/pboci.2019.191.61.

[23] Zhang C, Du J, Peng Z. Correlation between Enterococcus faecalis and Persistent Intraradicular Infection Compared with Primary Intraradicular Infection: A Systematic Review. J Endod 2015;41:1207–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.04.008.

[24] Ramanathan S, Solete P. Cone-beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Root Canal Preparation using Various Rotary Instruments: An in vitro Study. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 2015;16:869–72. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1773.

[25] Jose J, P. A, Subbaiyan H. Different Treatment Modalities followed by Dental Practitioners for Ellis Class 2 Fracture – A Questionnaire-based Survey. The Open Dentistry Journal 2020;14:59–65. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210602014010059.

[26] Neelakantan P, Romero M, Vera J, Daood U, Khan A, Yan A, et al. Biofilms in Endodontics—Current Status and Future Directions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2017;18:1748. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081748.

[27] Nasim I, Nandakumar M. Comparative evaluation of grape seed and cranberry extracts in preventing enamel erosion: An optical emission spectrometric analysis. Journal of Conservative Dentistry 2018;21:516. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_110_18.

[28] Tronstad L, Asbjørnsen K, Døving L, Pedersen I, Eriksen HM. Influence of coronal restorations on the periapical health of endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000;16:218–21. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016005218.x.

[29] Ravinthar K, Jayalakshmi. Recent Advancements in Laminates and Veneers in Dentistry. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2018;11:785. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2018.00148.8.

[30] Kumar D, Delphine Priscilla Antony S. Calcified Canal and Negotiation-A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2018;11:3727. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2018.00683.2.

[31] Teja KV, Ramesh S. Shape optimal and clean more. Saudi Endodontic Journal 2019;9:235. https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_72_19.

[32] Kerekes K, Tronstad L. Long-term results of endodontic treatment performed with a standardized technique. J Endod 1979;5:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(79)80154-5.

[33] Manohar M, Sharma S. A survey of the knowledge, attitude, and awareness about the principal choice of intracanal medicaments among the general dental practitioners and nonendodontic specialists. Indian Journal of Dental Research 2018;29:716. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_716_16.

[34] Camilleri J. Tricalcium Silicate Cements with Resins and Alternative Radiopacifiers. Journal of Endodontics 2014;40:2030–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.08.016.

[35] Camilleri J. Characterization and hydration kinetics of tricalcium silicate cement for use as a dental biomaterial. Dental Materials 2011;27:836–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.04.010.

[36] Viapiana R, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Hungaro-Duarte MA, Tanomaru-Filho M, Camilleri J. Chemical characterization and bioactivity of epoxy resin and Portland cement-based sealers with niobium and zirconium oxide radiopacifiers. Dental Materials 2014;30:1005–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.007.

[37] Gutmann JL, Rakusin H. Perspectives on root canal obturation with thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha.

Int Endod J 1987;20:261–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1987.tb00625.x.

[38] Zander HA. Reaction of the Pulp to Calcium Hydroxide. Journal of Dental Research 1939;18:373–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345390180040601.

[39] Miletić I, Anić I, Karlović Z, Marsan T, Pezelj-Ribarić S, Osmak M. Cytotoxic effect of four root filling materials. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000;16:287–90. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016006287.x.

[40] Nasim I, Hussainy S, Thomas T, Ranjan M. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year followup. Journal of Conservative Dentistry 2018;21:510. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_51_18.

[41] Bouillaguet S, Wataha JC, Tay FR, Brackett MG, Lockwood PE. Initial in vitro biological response to contemporary endodontic sealers. J Endod 2006;32:989–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.05.006.

[42] Orstavik D. Antibacterial properties of root canal sealers, cements and pastes. Int Endod J 1981;14:125–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1981.tb01073.x.

[43] Grossman L. Antimicrobial effect of root canal cements. J Endod 1980;6:594–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(80)80019-7.

[44] Spångberg LS, Barbosa SV, Lavigne GD. AH 26 releases formaldehyde. J Endod 1993;19:596–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80272-4.

[45] Meyer BK, Ni A, Hu B, Shi L. Antimicrobial preservative use in parenteral products: Past and present. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2007;96:3155–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.20976.