Using the CIPP Model to Ensure Administration Evaluation of Academic Department

Sanaa Shindi

doi:10.61841/yg3b2991

Authors

Sanaa Shindi Faculty Member at College of Administration and Economics, University of Babylon, Babylon, Iraq Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/yg3b2991

Keywords:

CIPP model, context evaluation, input evaluation, process evaluation, product evaluation, curriculum

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the academic programs at the university level in light of selected quality standards (CIPP) based on a survey. The present study uses the descriptive-analytical approach, whereby the researcher collects data and analyzes them in order to make a judgment about the extent of applying quality standards in the initial studies programs. The aim is to improve these programs to be in line with the quality standards for the academic programs. The study population consists of a sample of 20 academic departments evaluated by interviewing about 65 faculty members: (46) males, and (19) females. In this study, the evaluation questionnaire is adopted from ((Rudebjer, Taylor and Del,2001) & (Taylor 2003) which is based on the CIPP evaluation model (Stufflebeam DL. 1983)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hakan, K., & Seval, F. (2011). CIPP evaluation model scale : development , reliability and validity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.146

Amin, H. & Khan, AR. (2009). Acquiring Knowledge for Evaluation of Teachers’ Performance in Higher Education – using a Questionnaire. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), Vol. 2, No. 1.

Robinson, B. (2002). The CIPP has its formation from the earlier stages where there were no paragraphs or any acronyms for any product or stanzas. The CIPP approach to evaluation. Collit project: A background note from Bernadette

Aziz, S. (n.d.). Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level : A Case Study. 5(1), 189–206.

Al-shanawani, H. M. (2019). Evaluation of Self-Learning Curriculum for Kindergarten Using Stufflebeam ’ s CIPP Model. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822380

Hakan, K., & Seval, F. (2011). CIPP evaluation model scale : development , reliability and validity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.146

Mirzazadeh, A., Gandomkar, R., Hejri, S. M., Hassanzadeh, G., Koochak, E., Golestani, A., . . .Razavi, E. (2016). Undergraduate medical education program renewal: A longitudinal context, input, process, and product evaluation study. Perspectives on Medical Education, 5, 15-23.

Middlewood, David and Neil Burton (2001). Managing the Curriculum. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Rudebjer P, Taylor P and Del Castillo RA eds. 2001. A Guide to Learning Agroforestry- a framework for developing agroforestry curricula in Southeast Asia. Training and Education Report no. 51. Bogor: ICRAF.

Stufflebeam DL. 1983. The CIPP evaluation model for programme evaluation, in Madau GF, Scriven GF and� Stufflebeam DL Eds. Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2002a). CIPP evaluation checklist. A tool for applying the fifth installment of the CIPP model to assess long-term enterprises. Retrieved from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/cippchecklist.htm

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2002b). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D.L. Stufflebeam, C.F. Madam & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation models (pp. 279-317). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Taylor P. 2003. How to Design a Training Course � a guide to participatory curriculum development (to be published Spring 2003). London: VSO/Continuum.