PREVALENCE AND ANALYSIS OF FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH CANINE IMPACTION IN CLASS III MALOCCLUSION. - A RETROSPECTIVE CASE STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/bewqd815Keywords:
Canine impaction, classIII malocclusion, Incidence, skeletal classIII, dental class IIIAbstract
Impacted teeth are those with a delayed eruption time or that are not expected to erupt completely based on clinical and radiographic assessment. After the third molars, the maxillary canine is the second most frequently impacted tooth in the dental arch. The prevalence of impacted maxillary canine is 0.9 to 2.2%. Knowledge of occlusion of each patient can contribute significantly to complete care and instruction. The aim of the study was to analyze the association of canine impaction to age, gender and types in class III malocclusions. This was a single retrospective study set in a university dental hospital with predominantly south Indian population. The data was collected from the electronic database of the university. A total of 50 patients were included in the study. Data tabulation was done in EXCEL then it was imported and assessed using Statistical Package for Social Science 20(SPSS, IBM corporation). A test for frequency of incidence of impacted canine among patients diagnosed with class III malocclusions was conducted. Chi-square test was conducted for association of age, gender, type of class III malocclusion. The results were descriptively presented in the form of graphs and tables. Only patients with true class III malocclusion in the age range of 13-30 yrs. were included in the study. Among the study population 78% of the patients were diagnosed with a skeletal class III and 22% of the patients were diagnosed with a dental class III. Out of the whole study population only four patients had impacted canines that is 8% of the total study population. Of the total study population, 6% of the patients with impacted canines were male and 2% of the patients were female. Canine impaction has statistically significant association to both adult and child age groups, p=0.028. Also males patients with class III malocclusions showed a higher association to canine impaction, p=0.004. Among the study population , canine impaction showed more association with dental class III patients ,( p = 0.038 ).
Downloads
References
[1] Richardson G, Russell KA. A review of impacted permanent maxillary cuspids-diagnosis and prevention.
Journal-Canadian Dental Association 2000;66:497–502.
[2] Yavuz MS, Aras MH, Büyükkurt MC. Impacted mandibular canines. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007.
[3] D’Amico RM, Bjerklin K, Kurol J, Falahat B. Long-term Results of Orthodontic Treatment of Impacted
Maxillary Canines. Angle Orthod 2003;73:231–8.
[4] Rajic S, Muretic Z, Percac S. Impacted canine in a prehistoric skull. Angle Orthod 1996;66:477–80.
[5] Bishara SE, Kommer DD, McNeil MH, Montagano LN, Oesterle LJ, Youngquist HW. Management of
impacted canines. Am J Orthod 1976;69:371–87.
[6] Smith RJ, Bailit HL. Problems and methods in research on the genetics of dental occlusion. Angle Orthod
1977.
[7] Abu-Hussein M, Sarafianou A. Mathematical analysis of dental arch of children in normal occlusion: a
literature review. International Journal of Medical 2012.
[8] Abu-Hussein M, Watted N, Azzaldeen A. Prevalence of Malocclusion and Impacted Canine in Arab
Israelian Population (Arab48). Journal of Public … 2015.
[9] Gill DS, Naini FB. Orthodontics: Principles and Practice. John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
[10] Angle EH. Classification of malocclusion. dental Cosmos. St Louis 1899:248–64.
[11] Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.
[12] Sivamurthy G, Sundari S. Stress distribution patterns at mini-implant site during retraction and intrusion—
a three-dimensional finite element study. Prog Orthod 2016;17:4.
[13] Krishnan S, Saravana Pandian AKS. Effect of bisphosphonates on orthodontic tooth movement—an
update. Journal of Clinical and 2015.
[14] Vikram NR, Prabhakar R, Kumar SA, Karthikeyan MK, Saravanan R. Ball Headed Mini Implant. J Clin
Diagn Res 2017;11:ZL02–3.
[15] Viswanath A, Ramamurthy J, Dinesh SPS, Srinivas A. Obstructive sleep apnea: Awakening the hidden
truth. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18:1–7.
[16] Felicita AS. Quantification of intrusive/retraction force and moment generated during en-masse retraction
of maxillary anterior teeth using mini-implants: A conceptual approach. Dental Press J Orthod
2017;22:47–55.
[17] Rubika J, Felicita AS, Sivambiga V. Gonial angle as an indicator for the prediction of growth pattern.
World J Dent 2015;6:161–3.
[18] Jain RK, Kumar SP, Manjula WS. Comparison of intrusion effects on maxillary incisors among mini
implant anchorage, j-hook headgear and utility arch. J Clin Diagn Res 2014.
[19] Saravana Pandian K, Krishnan S, Aravind Kumar S. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft-tissue
facial profile of Indian adults. Indian J Dent Res 2018;29:137.
[20] Ramesh Kumar KR, Shanta Sundari KK, Venkatesan A, Chandrasekar S. Depth of resin penetration into
enamel with 3 types of enamel conditioning methods: A confocal microscopic study. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:479–85.
[21] Dinesh SPS, Arun AV, Sundari KKS. An Indigenously Designed Apparatus for Measuring Orthodontic
Force. Journal of Clinical and 2013.
[22] Felicita AS, Chandrasekar S, Shanthasundari KK. Determination of craniofacial relation among the
subethnic Indian population: A modified approach-(Sagittal relation). Indian J Dent Res 2012;23:305.
[23] Samantha C, Sundari S, Chandrasekhar S. Comparative evaluation of two Bis-GMA based orthodontic
bonding adhesives-A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical and 2017.
[24] Kamisetty SK, Verma JK, Arun SS. SBS vs Inhouse Recycling Methods-An Invitro Evaluation. Journal of
Clinical and 2015.
[25] Felicita AS. Orthodontic management of a dilacerated central incisor and partially impacted canine with
unilateral extraction--A case report. The Saudi Dental Journal 2017;29:185–93.
[26] Felicita AS. Orthodontic extrusion of Ellis Class VIII fracture of maxillary lateral incisor--The slingshot
method. The Saudi Dental Journal 2018;30:265–9.
[27] Hardy DK, Cubas YP, Orellana MF. Prevalence of angle class III malocclusion: A systematic review and
meta-analysis 2012.
[28] Wright DM. Forced Eruption of an Impacted Lower Canine in a 48-Year-Old Man. The Journal of the
American Dental Association 1995.
[29] Camilleri S, Scerri E. Transmigration of mandibular canines—a review of the literature and a report of five cases. Angle Orthod 2003.
[30] Mitchell L. Displacement of a mandibular canine following fracture of the mandible. Br Dent J 1993;174:417–8.
[31] Nagahara K, Yuasa S, Yamada A, Ito K, Watanabe O, Iizuka T, et al. Etiological study of relationship
between impacted permanent teeth and malocclusion. Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi 1989;27:913–
24.
[32] Dachi SF, Howell FV. A survey of 3,874 routine full-mouth radiographs: II. A study of impacted teeth.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1961.
[33] Farhat Yaasmeen Sadique Basha, Rajeshkumar S, Lakshmi T, Anti-inflammatory activity of Myristica
fragrans extract . Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci., 2019 ;10(4), 3118-3120 DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v10i4.1607
[34] Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou M, Stellzig A. The class II division 2 craniofacial type is associated with
numerous congenital tooth anomalies. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:529–35.
[35] Leifert S, Jonas IE. Dental Anomalies as a Microsymptom of Palatal Canine Displacement. J Orofac
Orthop 2003;64:108–20
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
