A REVIEW : CD FABRICATION WITH TECHNOLOGY DIFFERENT FROM CONVENTIONAL METHOD

Harini B; Venkatesh Kommi; Keerthi Sashank; Anitha Roy

doi:10.61841/ey1w7d75

Authors

Harini B Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Tamil Nadu, India Author
Venkatesh Kommi Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Tamil Nadu, India Author
Keerthi Sashank Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Tamil Nadu, India Author
Anitha Roy Department of Pharmacology, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Tamil Nadu, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/ey1w7d75

Keywords:

Complete denture, fabrication, CAD/CAM, conventional method, digital dentures

Abstract

The difference in Complete denture fabrication with technology and conventional methods and its evolution over the past few years. Both conventional and newer technology have their own advantages and disadvantages in fabricating complete dentures. The conventional method of fabricating was the oldest and earliest method used for fabrication. Now this method of fabrication of complete dentures has been slowly replaced by technology. Technology involves (CAD/CAM) Computer - aided design / computer - aided manufacture of complete dentures in dentistry. Time management is very less in opting digital denture methods over conventional method as it reduces the time for recording from the patient’s, processing time in the labs and also the trial method in checking the final dentures on the patients .Clinical sitting also plays a major rule in digital denture and conventional method by limiting the number of visits to the dentist and mainly the maintenance of complete dentures differ both in CAD/ CAM and conventional method of fabrication. Many countries are eventually adapting CAD CAM procedures as the technology is available widely around the world. In this review, an overview of complete denture fabrication with technology different from conventional method, necessities in opting technology over conventional method and the advantages and disadvantages of digital dentures and conventional method are reviewed. Overall, the need for changing from conventional method to digital technology for fabricating complete dentures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Ariga P, Nallaswamy D, Jain AR, Ganapathy DM. Determination of Correlation of Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth using Extraoral and Intraoral Factors in Indian Population: A Systematic Review. World Journal of Dentistry 2018; 9:68–75. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1509.

[2] Ashok V, Suvitha S. Awareness of all ceramic restoration in rural population. Research Journal of

Pharmacy and Technology 2016; 9:1691. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2016.00340.1.

[3] Selvan SR, Ganapathy D. Efficacy of fifth generation cephalosporins against methicillin-resistant

Staphylococcus aureus-A review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2016; 9:1815.

https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2016.00369.3.

[4] Baba NZ. The Fabrication of Digital Complete Dentures. Treating the Complete Denture Patient

2020:263–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119569558.ch40.

[5] Jung Y, Lee J, Hong S-J, Noh K, Kim H-S, Pae A. Fabrication of complete dentures by conventional

method and CAD/CAM milling: A case report. The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics

2019; 57:296. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.3.296.

[6] Lang BR. A review of traditional therapies in complete dentures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1994; 72:538–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90128-7.

[7] Lo Russo L, Caradonna G, Biancardino M, De Lillo A, Troiano G, Guida L. Digital versus conventional workflow for the fabrication of multiunit fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vertical marginal fit in controlled in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 122:435–40.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.001.

[8] Kannan A, Venugopalan S. A systematic review on the effect of use of impregnated retraction cords on gingiva. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2018; 11:2121. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2018.00393.1.

[9] Afshari FS, Hallas MB, Knoernschild KL. An Alternative Approach in Fabrication of Fixed Complete Dentures Using a Duplicate Denture. Journal of Prosthodontics 2012; 21:569–72.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849x.2012.00863.x.

[10] Collin A. Factors affecting implementation success of CAD and CAM additions to CAD/CAM systems: operating level personnel’s perspective n.d. https://doi.org/10.22215/etd/1994-02697.

[11] Rekow ED. Digital dentistry: The new state of the art - Is it disruptive or destructive? Dent Mater 2020; 36:9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.08.103.

[12] Sakaguti NM, Fernandes MM, Mazzilli LEN, Plana JAC, Bouchardet FCH, Nogueira de Oliveira R.

Development of a computer-aided design software for the quantitative evaluation of aesthetic damage. PLoS One 2019;14: e0226322. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226322.

[13] Venugopalan S, Ariga P, Aggarwal P, Viswanath A. Magnetically retained silicone facial prosthesis.

Niger J Clin Pract 2014; 17:260–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.127575.

[14] Saleh E, Govshievich A, Justino J, Weil AG, Borsuk DE. The Use of Virtual Surgical Planning for

Reduction Cranioplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020;8:e2565.

https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002565.

[15] Janeva NM, Kovacevska G, Elencevski S, Panchevska S, Mijoska A, Lazarevska B. Advantages of

CAD/CAM versus Conventional Complete Dentures - A Review. Open Access Maced J Med Sci

2018; 6:1498–502. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.308.

[16] Wang PCC. Advances in CAD/CAM: Case Studies. Springer Science & Business Media; 1984.

[17] Jyothi S, Robin PK, Ganapathy D, Anandiselvaraj. Periodontal Health Status of Three Different Groups Wearing Temporary Partial Denture. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2017; 10:4339. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2017.00795.8.

[18] Groover. CAD/CAM: Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing. Pearson Education India; 2006.

[19] Wang PCC. Advances in CAD/CAM Workstations: Case Studies. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.

[20] Biss M, Murphy M, Lieber M. Qualification of a multi-diagnostic detonator-output characterization procedure utilizing PMMA witness blocks 2018. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5045004.

[21] Kühn K-D. Properties of PMMA Cement Dough. PMMA Cements 2013:93–113.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41536-4_7.

[22] Yamada T, Yamamoto A, Matsunaga A, Watanabe T, Nakazawa H. An Alternative Method for CD Measurement by a Conventional Spectrophotometer. Analytical Sciences 2000; 16:325–7.

https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.16.325.

[23] Inc. KN, Kernel Networks Inc. Complete Denture Tooth Movement in Digital Light Processing Versus Conventional Fabrication Techniques. Case Medical Research 2019. https://doi.org/10.31525/ct1-nct04025697.

[24] Carlsson GE, Omar R. The future of complete dentures in oral rehabilitation. A critical review. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37:143–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02039.x.

[25] Ranganathan H, Ganapathy DM, Jain AR. Cervical and Incisal Marginal Discrepancy in Ceramic

Laminate Veneering Materials: A SEM Analysis. Contemp Clin Dent 2017; 8:272–8.

https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_156_17.

[26] Ganapathy D, Sathyamoorthy A, Ranganathan H, Murthy kumar K. Effect of Resin Bonded Luting Agents Influencing Marginal Discrepancy in All Ceramic Complete Veneer Crowns. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10: ZC67–70. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/21447.9028.

[27] Hobrink J, Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Eckert S, Jacob R, Fenton A, et al. Prosthodontic Treatment for

Edentulous Patients: Complete Dentures and Implant-Supported Prostheses. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2003.

[28] Basha FYS, Ganapathy D, Venugopalan S. Oral Hygiene Status among Pregnant Women. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2018; 11:3099. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2018.00569.3.

[29] Ganapathy DM, Kannan A, Venugopalan S. Effect of Coated Surfaces influencing Screw Loosening in Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World Journal of Dentistry 2017; 8:496–502. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1493.

[30] Duraisamy R, Krishnan CS, Ramasubramanian H, Sampathkumar J, Mariappan S, Navarasampatti Sivaprakasam A. Compatibility of Nonoriginal Abutments with Implants: Evaluation of Microgap at the Implant-Abutment Interface, With Original and Nonoriginal Abutments. Implant Dent 2019; 28:289–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000885.

[31] Ashok V, Nallaswamy D, Benazir Begum S, Nesappan T. Lip Bumper Prosthesis for an Acromegaly Patient: A Clinical Report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2014; 14:279–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0339-6.

[32] Vijayalakshmi B, Ganapathy D. Medical management of cellulitis. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2016; 9:2067. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2016.00422.4.

[33] Subasree S, Murthykumar K, Dhanraj. Effect of Aloe Vera in Oral Health-A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2016; 9:609. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2016.00116.5.

[34] Farhat Yaasmeen Sadique Basha, Rajeshkumar S, Lakshmi T, Anti-inflammatory activity of Myristica fragrans extract. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci., 2019 ;10(4), 3118-3120 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v10i4.1607

[35] Ajay R, Suma K, Ali S, Sivakumar JK, Rakshagan V, Devaki V, et al. Effect of surface modifications on the retention of cement-retained implant crowns under fatigue loads: An In vitro study. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences 2017; 9:154. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_146_17.