Exploring the Features and Shades of Modality in an Autobiography through Corpus Patterns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/p55q1h29Keywords:
autobiography;, corpus patterns;, modality, shades of modality, types of modalityAbstract
This study explored the occurrences of modalities (i.e. boulmaic, deontic, epistemic, and perception), attitude and shades marked by the writer in an autobiography. In addition, the study tested the patterns designed to study modality in different genres. For this purpose, a corpus was developed and tagged through Parts of Speech (POS) Tagger for analysis employing AntConc 3.4.4.0 which was further interpreted in the light of Simpson’s (1993) model. The writer was observed to shape the meaning in the autobiography through different functions of modality i.e. (un)certainty, attitude, point of view, ability, possibility and probability. By using these functions, the text was made persuasive, interesting and more realistic. The incorporation of such functions marked positive and negative shades in the autobiography that led to comprehend the writer’s point of view through the text. Conclusively, the text appeared more positive than negative shaded. The positive shade was marked through deontic and boulomaic modalities that denoted alienation and uncertainty of the writer. Moreover, the application of the proposed patterns was also successful to explore the features of modality through corpus tools. The study proposed them in the form of a model for further studies.
Downloads
References
1. Abdul-Fatttah, H. A. (2011). Formal-functional analysis of the English modal auxiliaries. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literature, 3(1), 39-63.
2. Ahmad, M., Mahmood, M. A., Mahmood, M. I., & Siddique, A. R. (2019). Use of modal verbs as stance markers in Pakistani English newspaper editorials. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 9(1), 1-15.
3. Ahmad, M., Mahmood, M. A., & Farukh, A. (2020 In Press). Use of modal verbs as stance markers in Pakistani English newspaper editorials: A corpus-based study. Asia Pacific Media Educator.
4. Aidinlou, N. A., & Mohammadpour, S. (2012). An investigation of epistemic modality in literary texts. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 2(4), 729-737.
5. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
6. Bonyadi, A. (2011). Linguistic manifestations of modality in newspaper editorials. International Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 1-13.
7. Coates, J., & Leech, G. (1980). The meanings of the modals in British and American English. York Papers in Linguistics, 8, 23-34.
8. Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
9. DeRose, K. (1991). Epistemic possibilities. The Philosophical Review, 100(4), 581-605.
10. Egan, A., Hawthorne, J., & Weatherson. B. (2005). Epistemic modals in context. In G. Preyer &G. Peter (Eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth (pp. 131–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Gavins, J. (2007). Text world theory: An introduction. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
12. Hacking, I. (1967). Possibility. The Philosophical Review, 76(2), 143-168.
13. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
14. Iwamoto, N. (2007). Modality and point of view in media discourse. Retrieved January 1, 2020, from http://human.kanagwau.ac.jp/../16308.pdf.
15. Kiparsky, R. V., & Kiparsky, C. (1970). Fact. In M. Bierwisch & K. E. Heidolph (eds.), Progress in Linguistics: A Collection of Papers (pp. 143–173). The Hague: Mouton
16. Kratzer, A. (1981). The notional category of modality. In H. J. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser (Eds.),Words, Worlds, and Contexts. New Approaches in Word Semantics (pp. 38–74). Berlin: de Gruyter.
17. Kratzer, A.(1991). Modality. In A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (Eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (pp. 639–650). Berlin: de Gruyter.
18. Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
19. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. London & New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. MacFarlane. J. (2003). Epistemic modalities and relative truth. Retrieved January 1, 2020 from http://philosophy.berkeley.edu/macfarlane/epistmod.pdf.
21. Mahmood, R., Batool, A., Shah, S. K., & Parveen, S. (2013). A corpus driven comparative analysis of modal verbs in Pakistani and British English fictions. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(11), 28-37.
22. Mukundan, J., & Khojasteh, L. (2011). Modal auxiliary verbs in prescribed Malaysian English textbooks. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 79-89.
23. Nhat, T. N. M., & Minh, N. T. D. (2019). Epistemic modality in Ted Talks on education. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 35(4), 76-91.
24. Nordquist, R. (2018): Languages. English grammar. Parts of speech. Adverbs. Retrieved January 2, 2020 from https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-cohesion-composition-1689863.
25. Palmer, F. R. (1986). Mood and modality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Palmer, F. (2003). Theoretical, descriptive and typological issues. Modality in contemporary English. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
27. Palmer, F. R. (2007). Mood and modality. Beijing: World Book Publishing Company.
28. Parina, J. C., & de Leon, K. D. (2014). A stylistic analysis of the use of modality to identify the point of view in a short story. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 20(2), 91-101.
29. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., &Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
30. Sadia, S., & Ghani, M. (2018). Modality in editorials of Pakistani English newspapers: A corpus based study. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 144-151.
31. Simpson, P. (1993). Language, ideology and point of view. New York: Routledge,
32. Simpson, P. (2005). Modality and narrative. In D. Herman, M. Jahn & M. L. Ryan (Eds.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory (pp. 313-315). Taylor and Francis.
33. Teller, P. (1972). Epistemic possibility. Philosophia, 2, 302-320
34. Toolan, M. (1998). Language in literature: An introduction to stylistics. London: Arnold.
35. Vine, B. (2004). Modal verbs in New Zealand English directives. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 3(3), 205-220.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
