Compiler Design Life Cycle And Comparison of Programming Languages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/w3kw6t25Keywords:
Python, Code, Design, Programming Languages.Abstract
Python is a popular object-oriented language for programming for Python. Sometimes programmers spend a lot of time on running the program, while at the same time on code size. It creates the code more complex and untrustworthy, that reduces code efficiency So many compilers are currently available, like C, Java, C++, C #, python and so on. The code optimizing techniques for a python compiler have been researched separately and we come across new strategies for code optimization which is a clever way to do python code. In this paper we have done a compiler application and it has been written in five programming languages which we mentioned above where we have made a comparison between those languages in order to reach the best suitable language for building the compiler that help the programmer and facilitate the construction process and also the time to execution code is less and also less memory and less code size.
Downloads
References
[1] Prajakta, G., Sumedh, P. “Smart Coding using New Code Optimization Techniques in Java to Reduce Runtime Overhead of Java Compiler” international Journal of Computer Applications, Volume 125 No.15,( 2015), 11-16.
[2] Kevin, W. Albert, N., Andreas, Gal., David, G. “Optimization Strategies for a Java Virtual Machine Interpreter on the Cell Broadband Engine"1Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland,2ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 3University of California, Irvine, CA, USA, (2008).
[3] Peter, S. “Numeric performance in C, C# and Java", IT University of Copenhagen Denmark, Version
0.9.1 of 2010-02- 19. (2010).
[4] Guihot, H. “Optimizing Java Code. Pro Android Apps Performance Optimization”, Springer, (2012), 1-31.
[5] Matthieu A. “Teaching compilers with python”, January 30, (2010), http://www.hearc.ch/hearc/fr/isic/
[6] Halambi A., Grun P., Ganesh V., Khare A., Dutt N., Nicolau A. “EXPRESSION: A Language for Architecture Exploration through Compiler/Simulator Retargetability”. In Proc. of the Conf, on Design Automation and Test Europe (DATE99), March 1999.
[7] Mohammed, N.M., Lomte, S.S. “Secure and Efficient Outsourcing of Large Scale Linear Fractional Programming,” Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer, Vol. 1025, (2020).
[8] AL-Bakhrani, A., Hagar, A., Hamoud, A., Kawathekar, S. “Comparative Analysis of Cpu Scheduling Algorithms: Simulation and its Applications”. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, Vol. 29, No. 3, (2020), 483-494.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
