HUMAN ERROR STILL CAUSES A THREAT TO CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY: IS IT BECAUSE OF NEGLIGENCE OR LACK OF KNOWLEDGE? (Evidence from the construction industry of Tashkent City, Uzbekistan)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/1j9zw510Keywords:
Human capital,, awareness, accident, knowledge, working conditions, Health and Safety Regulatio, cost of safety.Abstract
Current research presents a systematic analyses based on approach for Prospective Health and Safety Performance on construction sites, with causal relationships and interactions between international standards and Uzbek construction site regulations taken into account. Four typical types of construction enterprises, namely the private enterprise, state enterprise, joint enterprise, and international enterprise are selected as sample to measure the level of safety performance given variables. Results provide professional safety performance practice in the construction site, and indicate tha the level o total knowledge and practice ofconstruction site personals. It can be explained that the construction sites hav graduall matured with the international norms, and conventions for improving risk assessment low level of accident rate in construction industry. Health and Safety performance differences existing due to organizational structure and skilled employee of the construction company categories are compared and analyzed based on evaluation results. This article provides insights into conceptual relationships among Health and Safety performance variables and goals, which can facilitate the development of ILO 155 and 167 conventions in construction industry of Uzbekistan. Main purpose of the current paper is examine risk level on site, evaluate human factor and preventing accident rate by reducing workers knowledge and experience for self-awareness.
Downloads
References
1. https://cdn2.img.sputniknews-uz.com/i/logo.png
2. https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-lo/newsroom/news/WCMS_007969/lang--en/index.htm
3. https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-lo/newsroom/news/WCMS_007789/lang--en/index.htm
4. https://sputniknews-uz.com/news/20190612/11747673/zbekistonda-ishlab-chiarishda-alok-blatganlar- soni-ortmoda---Menat-vazirligi.html
5. Camino López, M.A.; Fontaneda, I.; González Alcantara, O.J.; Ritzel, D.O. The special severity of occupational accidents in the afternoon: “The lunch e ect”. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2011, 43, 1104–1116.
6. Chi, C.-F.; Chang, T.-C.; Ting, H.-I. Accident paterns and prevention measures for fatal occupational falls in the construction industry. Appl. Ergon. 2005, 36, 391–400.
7. Jabbari, M.; Ghorbani, R. Developing Techniques for cause-responsibility analysis of occupational accidents.Accid. Anal. Preve. 2016, 96, 101–107.
8. Goh, Y.M.; Ubeynarayana, C. Construction accident narrative classification: An evaluation of text mining techniques. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2017, 108, 122–130.
9. Zhipeng, Z.; Irrzarry, J.; Li, Q. Using network theory to explore the complexity of subway construction accident network (SCAN) for promotig safety managemet. Saf. Sci. 2014, 64, 127–136.
10. Cheng, C.W.; Leu, S.L.; Lin, C.-C.; Fan, C. Charasteristic analysis of occupational accidents at small construction enterprises. Saf. Sci. 2010, 48, 698–707.
11. Hale, A.; Walker, D.; Walters, N.; Bolt, H. Developing the understanding of underlying causes of construction fatal accidents. Saf. Sci. 2012, 50, 2020–2027.
12. Ale, B.; Bellamy, L.; Baksteen, H.; Damen, M.; Goossens, L.; Hale, A.; Whiston, J. Accidents in the construction industry in the Netherlands: An analysis of accident reprorts using Storybuilder. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2008, 93, 1523–1533.
13. Khosravi, Y.; Asilian-Mahabadi, H.; Hajizadeh, E.; Hassanzadeh-Rangi, N.; Bastani, H.; Behzadan, A.H.Factors Influencing Unsafe Behaviors and Accidents on Construction Sites: A Review. Int. J. Occup. Saf.Ergon. 2015, 20, 111–125.
14. Salminen, S. Have young workers more injuries than old ones? An international literature review. J. Saf. Res.2004, 35, 513–521.
15. Hoła, B.; Szóstak, M. Methodology of Analysing the Accident Rate in the Construction. Procedia Eng. 2017, 172, 355–362.
16. Yi, J.-S.; Kim, Y.W.; Kim, K.-A.; Koo, B. A suggested color scheme for reducing perception-related accidents on construction work sites. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2012, 48, 185–192.
17. Rameezdeen, R.; Elmualim, A. The Impact of Heat Waves on Occurrence and Severity. Int. J. Environ. Res.Public Health 2017, 14, 70
18. Esmaeili, B.; Hallowell, M.; Rajagopalan, B. Attribute-Based Safety Risk Assessment. I: Analysis at the Fundamental Level. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2015, 141, 04015021
19. Carrillo-Castrillo, J.A.; Trillo-Cabello, A.F.; Rubio-Romero, J.C. Construction accidents: Identification of the main associations between causes, mechanisms and stages of the construction process. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2017, 23, 240–250
20. Abdelhamid, T.S.; Everett, J.G. Identifying root causes of construction accidents. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2000, 126, 52–60.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.