Influence of spacer on symmetrical stepped InGaAs/InP DGMOSFET for enhancement of the device performance.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/peaffs65Keywords:
Spacer, Short channel effect ,, ,InGa0As/InP,, On resistance, stepped gate.Abstract
In this work the impact of spacer in InGaAs/InP hetero stepped double gate MOS transistor is investigated by a 2D TCAD device simulator. To minimize the short channel effects (SCEs), underlap technique is used symmetrically in either side of the gate. However, it considerably decreases the On current due to enhanced channel resistance. Thus the spacers on underlap region are one of the solutions to overwhelm these problems. Therefore, difficulties associated with conventional underlap DG MOSFET can be eliminated with significant improvement in On current and intrinsic gain. Further, to reduce the punch-through effect, stepped gate concept is integrated in the double gate MOSFET to attain a better control on the channel carriers that eventually reduces the leakage current. So this paper presents a comparison made between symmetric spacer underlap hetero stepped double gate (SSUHS-DG) MOSFET and hetero stepped double gate (HS-DG) MOSFET; so far SSUHS-DG MOSFET offers better device performance.
Downloads
References
1. International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductor, 2012.
2. Xie, Q., Xu, J., Taur, Y. : Review and critique of analytic models of MOSFET short-channel effects in subthreshold regime,Vol.59. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices. (2012) 1569e1579.
3. Taur, Y., Ning, T.H.: Fundamentals of Modern VLSI Devices, Cambridge university press, 2009.
4. Robert, C., Doyle, B., Suman, D.: Integratednanoelectronicsfor the future, Vol.6.Nat Mater, (2007) 810– 820.
5. Sarkar, A., Jana, R.: The influence of gate underlap on analog and RF performance of III–V heterostructure double gate MOSFET, Vol.73. Superlattices and Microstructures. (2014) 256–267.
6. Chau, R., Datta, S., Majumdar, A.: Opportunities and Challenges of III-V Nanoelectronics for Future High-Speed, Low-Power Logic Applications Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Symposium,(2005) Palm Springs, CA,.
7. Pati, S. K. et.al.: Impact of gate length and barrier thickness on the performance of InP/InGaAs Based Double Gate Metal-OxideSemiconductorHeterostructure Field- Effect Transistor (DG MOSHFET),Vol.55. Superlattices and Microstructures. (2013) 124001-6.
8. Lau, K. M., Tang, C. W., Li, H. O., Zhong, Z. Y.: AlInAs/GaInAsmHEMTs on silicon substrates grown by MOCVD in IEDM Tech. Dig., (2008) 1–4.
9. Oktyabrsky, S., Peide, D.Y.: Fundamentals of III–V Semiconductor MOSFETs. Springer, New York, 2010.
10. Egard, M., Ohlsson, L., Borg, B. M., Lenrick, F., Wallenberg, R., Wernersson, L.E., Lind, E.: High transconductance self-aligned gate-last surface channel In0.53Ga0.47As MOSFET in IEDM Tech. Dig., (2011), 13.2.1–13.2.4.
11. Radosavljevic,M., Dewey, G., Fastenau, J.M., Kavalieros, J., Kotlyar, R., Chu-Kung, B., Liu, W.K., Lubyshev, D., Metz, M., Millard, K., Mukherjee, N., Pan, L.,
12. Pillarisetty, R., Rachmady, W., Shah, U., Chau, R.: Non-Planar, Multi-Gate InGaAs Quantum Well Field Effect Transistors with High-K Gate Dielectric and Ultra-Scaled Gate-to-Drain/Gate-toSource Separation for Low Power Logic Applications in Proc. IEDM Tech. Dig. (2010) 6.1.1–6.1.4.
13. Paul, B.C., Bansal, A., Roy, K.: Underlap DGMOS for digital-sub threshold operation,Vol.53. IEEE Trans. Electron Device (2006) 910e913.
14. A.B. Sachid, C.R. Manoj, D.K. Sharma, V.R. Rao, Gate fringe-induced barrier lowering in underlapFinFET structures and its optimization,Vol.29. IEEE Electron Device Lett. (2008) 128e130.
15. Bansal, A., Paul, B.C., Roy,K.: Modeling and optimization of fringe capacitance of nanoscale DGMOS devices, Vol.52.IEEE Trans. Electron Devices .(2005) 256e262.
16. Fossum, J.G., Chowdhury, M.M., Trivedi, V.P., King, T.J., Choi, Y.K., An,J., Yu, B.: Physical insights on design and modeling of nanoscaleFinFETs, IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting Tech. Dig. (2003) 29.1.1e29.1.4.
17. Kilchytska, V., eve, A., Vancaillie, N_ L., Levacq, D., Adriaensen, S., VanMeer, H.: Influence of device engineering on the analog and RF performance of SOI MOSFETs,Vol.52. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices
.( 2003) 577e588.
18. Trivedi,V.P., Fossum, J.G., Chowdhury, M.M.: NanoscaleFinFETs with gateesource/drain underlap,Vol.52. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices .(2005) 56e62.
19. Liang, X., Taur, Y.: A 2-D analytical solution for SCEs in DG MOSFETs, Vol.51.IEEE Trans. Electron Devices .(2004) 1385e1391.
20. Sarkar,A., Jana, R.: The influence of gate underlap on analogandRF performance of IIIeVheterostructure double gate MOSFET,Vol.73.Superlattices Microstruct.(2014) 256e267.
21. Kundu, A., Koley, K., Dutta, A., Sarkar, C.K.: Impact of gate metal work-function engineering for enhancement of subthresholdanalog/RF performance of underlap dual material gate DG-FET,Vol.54. Microelectron. Rel. (2014) 2717e2722.
22. Sachid, A.B., Francis, R., Baghini, M.S., Sharma, D.K., Bach, K.H., Mahnkopf, R., RamgopalRao, V.: Sub-20 nm gate length FinFET design: can high-k spacers make a difference IEDM Tech. Dig. (2008)1e4.
23. Rodder, M., Aur, S., Chen, I. -C.: A Scaled 1.8 V, 0.18 pm Gate Length CMOS Technology: Device Design and Reliability Considerations, IEDM Tech. Dig. (1995) pp. 415-418.
24. Chatterjee, A., Liu, J., Aur, S., Mozumder, P. K., Rodder, M., Chen, I.-C.: Pass Transistor Designs using Pocket Implant to Improve Manufacturability for 256 Mbit DRAM and Beyond, IEDM Tech. Dig. 1994,
pp. 87-90.
25. Saxena, R. S.: A Stepped Oxide Hetero-Material Gate Trench Power MOSFET for Improved Performance.Vol. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, (2009).
26. Atlas User’s Manual: Device Simulation Software, SILVACO Int. 2010.
27. PHADE, GAYATRI, and BK MISHRA. "RF PERFORMANCE AND MODELLING OF OPTICALLY
CONTROLLED MOSFET." International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering (IJECE) 2.2 (2013): 57-64
28. JAIN, PRAMOD, DS AJNAR, and PANKAJ NAIK. "A CMOS TRANSCONDUCTOR WITH
ENHANCED LINEARITY AND TUNABILITY IN 0.18 µm TECHNOLOGY."International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering (IJECE) 2.4 (2013): 175-182
29. ARORA, NEHA, et al. "High gain and phase margin cmos operational amplifier designs International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Research (IJEEER) 3.2 (2013): 19-28.
30. PANDA, SARADINDU, et al. "Comparative study of thermal noise of Si surrounding gate MOSFET (SGMOSFET) with different gate oxides." International Journal of Semiconductor Science & Technology (IJSST) 3.2 (2013): 17-22.
31. CHANG, FANG-WEI, JYH-LING LIN, and YOUNG-HUANG CHOU. "STUDY OF 600 V-CLASS SUPERJUNCTION METAL–OXIDE–SEMICONDUCTOR FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTORS WITH
TERMINATION OF TRENCH STRUCTURE AND SIPOS."International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Research (IJEEER) 6.6 (2016): 13-24
32. CHAKROBORTY, ANINDYA SHUBRO, and JAVED HOSSAIN. "PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF ELECTRICAL PARAMETERS BETWEEN GANFINFET AND SI-FINFET NANO
DEVICES."International Journal of Semiconductor Science & Technology (IJSST) 9.1 (2019): 1-12
33. Saha, Nandini, et al. "Comparative Study of IV-Characteristics of PIN Diode at Different Doping Concentrations for Different Semiconductor Materials Using TCAD." International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering (IJECE) 4.6 (2015): 1-8.
34. KUMAR, VINOD, and RS GAMAD. "DESIGN OF RING OSCILLATOR USING CS-CMOS FOR
MIXED SIGNAL SOCS."International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IJEEE) 2.2 (2013): 21-26
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
